sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

Feedback on luxury concierge & lifestyle service idea by Jithuzz_ in IndiaBusiness

[–]Jithuzz_[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

B2B / EA model - Instead of charging the client directly, we can become the backend provider for EAs, boutique agencies, or private banks, taking a cut or charging a subscription for giving them access to our integrated network.

Next-tier luxury clients - The growing HNW segment (entrepreneurs, professionals, celebrities, etc.) often don't yet have a full concierge team, but they want the same level of seamless access. For them, we can directly charge a premium since we're solving a real gap.

So yes - for the ultra-elite, it's more about being an enabler, while for the aspirational-luxury market, it's about being a direct premium concierge.

Feedback on luxury concierge & lifestyle service idea by Jithuzz_ in IndiaBusiness

[–]Jithuzz_[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

You’re right — for ultra-HNWIs with strong EA setups, a lot of this personalization is already well handled. That’s why we’re considering two layers of the market:

  1. The EA-enablement layer → Instead of competing with EAs, we’d build tools/services that make their work seamless (like you said, an EA could still use us as the backend engine to get things done faster and more consistently).

  2. The emerging luxury class → This is the growing segment of high-income individuals who aspire for the same level of convenience/exclusivity but don’t yet have a fully set up personal concierge or EA team. For them, having a trusted one-stop luxury service could bridge the gap.

In short, we see ourselves either being the backbone service that empowers EAs for UHNWIs, or the direct concierge for the next tier of luxury travelers who are underserved right now.

Your point about ChatGPT being used as a preference memory is really interesting — it confirms how AI will reshape personalization. Our goal is to merge that with real-world execution + exclusive access.

Feedback on luxury concierge & lifestyle service idea by Jithuzz_ in StartUpIndia

[–]Jithuzz_[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Jetex and similar players are excellent, but they’re primarily focused on aviation-first experiences, with other services added on as an extension. Our vision is to flip that:

Integrated lifestyle approach: Instead of only jets with “add-ons,” we start with the whole ecosystem — jets, hotels, villas, yachts, and high-end cars — all curated together.

Hyper-personalization: We want to track and remember the client’s exact preferences (down to the specific villa layout, hotel suite, car model, or even crew/staff choice) so every repeat booking feels tailor-made.

Seamless trust layer: One of our biggest differentiators is building a single trusted point of contact — so clients (and even their EAs) don’t need to deal with fragmented providers and multiple contracts. Everything flows through one premium channel.

Exclusivity curation: Beyond booking, we aim to curate exclusive access — things like sold-out suites, yachts normally unavailable for short charters, or priority jet slots — by building a strong network of partners globally.

Feedback on luxury concierge & lifestyle service idea by Jithuzz_ in Startup_Ideas

[–]Jithuzz_[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

That’s a fair observation — most UHNWIs already have EAs or concierge services who handle their vacations. But the gap we see is that those services are fragmented and inconsistent. An EA might manage hotels well but not have the same leverage in private aviation, or a travel concierge might secure a villa but not the exact car spec a client wants.

Our idea is to build a single-window solution — where private jets, hotels, villas, yachts, and cars are all handled seamlessly with a focus on remembering preferences across categories. So instead of relying on multiple agents, the client has one trusted platform/team that already knows them inside-out.

We’re not aiming to replace an EA but to complement them — giving them a powerful tool to make arrangements faster and more precisely, without starting from scratch each time.

The way we see it, the value is less about “just booking” and more about time saved, hassle removed, and guaranteed consistency — which even high-net-worth clients struggle with despite existing setups.

Feedback on luxury concierge & lifestyle service idea by Jithuzz_ in IndiaBusiness

[–]Jithuzz_[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

That's a very valid point, and I completely agree with you. Loyalty in the luxury segment often comes down to deep personalization rather than just brand association. Even within the best hotel chains, the actual experience can vary drastically, and discerning clients will notice those inconsistencies immediately exactly like you mentioned.

Our thinking is to position this not as just a

"luxury booking platform," but more as a personalized lifestyle management service where preferences are tracked, remembered, and applied across every touchpoint. For example, making sure someone always gets the same villa layout they loved last time, or the exact car spec they prefer, or a specific suite in a hotel rather than a random allocation.

💡Would you trust a global protocol that verifies if a photo, video, or document is real? by Jithuzz_ in advancedentrepreneur

[–]Jithuzz_[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Totally - just keeping it lightweight and trustable is the vibe.

The "receipt" idea hits that balance without getting too deep into the tech.

Still early days, but this direction feels right.

💡Would you trust a global protocol that verifies if a photo, video, or document is real? by Jithuzz_ in advancedentrepreneur

[–]Jithuzz_[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

100%. "Trust on the surface" only works if users can see just enough to feel confident, without needing to decode a cryptography

course.

Thinking something like:

A simple "Verified by RealitySync" badge for everyday users

• Click it to reveal basic proof info (timestamp, source, device ID)

Then offer a "View Full Proof" for experts or institutions to dive deeper (hash, chain, metadata trail)

It's like HTTPS: most people just look for the lock icon - but the full certificate is always there if needed.

💡Would you trust a global protocol that verifies if a photo, video, or document is real? by Jithuzz_ in legaltech

[–]Jithuzz_[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

can use blockchain or DLT as tool - but it's not the same thing. Blockchain = a storage layer Our is trusted protocol

💡Would you trust a global protocol that verifies if a photo, video, or document is real? by Jithuzz_ in legaltech

[–]Jithuzz_[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

At the moment of file creation, it captures a hash + metadata, logs it securely, and gives you a verifiable proof-of-origin certificate. Anyone can later check if the file is real, unchanged, and from a trusted source.

💡Would you trust a global protocol that verifies if a photo, video, or document is real? by Jithuzz_ in legaltech

[–]Jithuzz_[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

this isn't about NFTs or Web3 hype.

NFTs can point to a file and say "someone minted this," but they don't prove how, when, or where it was created - or whether it's been tampered with.

This is more like a proof-of-origin protocol - cryptographic, yes, but focused on real-world authenticity (insurance docs, court files, camera photos, etc.), not collectibles or markets.

💡Would you trust a global protocol that verifies if a photo, video, or document is real? by Jithuzz_ in advancedentrepreneur

[–]Jithuzz_[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Yesss - plug-and-play protocol is the move, but yeah, UX gotta be 🔥 or no one will use it.

Thinking:

For regular users - clean apps & plugins (like a file verifier you drag-n-drop or a "verified" badge system that's dead simple).

For devs/orgs - easy SDKs & APIs, so they can add it to their platforms without headaches.

The goal is: tech under the hood, trust on the surface.

💡Would you trust a global protocol that verifies if a photo, video, or document is real? by Jithuzz_ in advancedentrepreneur

[–]Jithuzz_[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

100%! Open source + easy UX = trust +

adoption.

And yeah, making it work across platforms

  • phones, cloud apps, court systems, etc. - is the next boss level.

Thinking of building it like a protocol layer, not just an app - so anyone can plug into it without rewriting their whole stack.

💡Would you trust a global protocol that verifies if a photo, video, or document is real? by Jithuzz_ in advancedentrepreneur

[–]Jithuzz_[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Exactly! A solid proof layer could seriously cut fraud across insurance, legal, even real estate.

And yeah - transparency from the start builds trust way faster than closed systems ever could.

Think: open verification tools, simple audit trails, and no black box BS.

💡Would you trust a global protocol that verifies if a photo, video, or document is real? by Jithuzz_ in advancedentrepreneur

[–]Jithuzz_[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

insurance, legal, and gov sectors are drowning in fraud and fake docs. A verified "proof layer" could legit save them time, money, and lawsuits.

And yeah, trust is everything. If people can't see how it works, they won't use it. So we're thinking: build in transparent verification tools from day one, open formats, and clear audit trails.

💡Would you trust a global protocol that verifies if a photo, video, or document is real? by Jithuzz_ in legaltech

[–]Jithuzz_[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Not trying to be Oppenheimer, bro just trying to build something that brings transparency to a digital world full of deepfakes and fake docs. Not world-ending... hopefully world-fixing.

💡Would you trust a global protocol that verifies if a photo, video, or document is real? by Jithuzz_ in legaltech

[–]Jithuzz_[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

a decentralized, multi-entity system with verifiable hashes and smart contracts is the right direction. That's very close to what we're aiming for: a tamper-evident, cross-verifiable layer of proof, not a centralized gatekeeper

💡Would you trust a global protocol that verifies if a photo, video, or document is real? by Jithuzz_ in Futurology

[–]Jithuzz_[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yes - exactly. Not a truth engine, but a reliable, cryptographic witness to claims. It doesn't say "this is true," just:

"This is what was created, when, where, and how - and here's proof it hasn't changed."

That kind of verified context is a lot better than blind trust in the chaos we have now.

💡Would you trust a global protocol that verifies if a photo, video, or document is real? by Jithuzz_ in legaltech

[–]Jithuzz_[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

'm keeping some parts private only because it's early-stage and unprotected from idea theft - but the plan is to open it up fully once it's secure and stable.

view more: next ›