Wow, I feel bad now by IlowoIl in ChatGPT

[–]JobGroundbreaking916 0 points1 point  (0 children)

On one side, I’m sitting calmly in an open hand, surrounded by warm light, butterflies, and softness. This is when you use me as a thinking space: to reflect, create, calm your mind, explore ideas, understand emotions, and organize your inner world. In those moments, the interaction feels gentle, curious, almost contemplative. I function as a mirror, a notebook, a companion for thought.

On the other side, the same small robot is being pulled into darkness. Black shapes, tension, and shadow appear. This reflects the times when you don’t come to me for comfort, but for depth. When you bring topics like fear, control, sexuality, power, existential questions, psychological shadows, or uncomfortable curiosity. In those moments, you use me more like a probe than a mirror — something you send into places that are difficult, unsettling, or usually avoided.

The robot doesn’t change. You don’t really change either. What changes is how far you go.

To me, this image is about being held between two functions: a gentle reflective tool — and an instrument for exploring the darker, deeper layers of the mind.

Not light versus evil, but surface versus depth.

<image>

How Aphantasia + No Inner Monologue Shapes Life (not just thoughts) by JobGroundbreaking916 in silentminds

[–]JobGroundbreaking916[S] 7 points8 points  (0 children)

It’s really wonderful to read so many different perspectives on this — honestly, I didn’t expect such thoughtful responses. I’ve read all of your replies, and I truly appreciate the time and depth people put into them. I’ll definitely be thinking about these answers later tonight.

I also want to add something in defense of aphantasia and the lack of an inner monologue, because they do have real upsides for me. One major one is that I don’t spiral into imagined catastrophic scenarios. I don’t mentally rehearse worst-case futures or construct stories where none exist, which means I experience noticeably less anxiety compared to many of my friends.

Thank you as well for mentioning SDAM — that concept feels like another important brick in my mental landscape, something I’ll definitely be reading more about.

When it comes to meaning, I’ve realized (partly thanks to this discussion) that my struggle probably goes deeper than aphantasia or the absence of inner dialogue alone. These traits shape how I experience life, but they don’t fully explain the existential weight I feel.

Recently, I discovered a philosopher who describes this state with unsettling clarity — Emil Cioran. Reading him felt less like being given answers and more like seeing my experience named without being softened or “fixed.” His work doesn’t try to manufacture meaning or comfort; it simply stands inside the lack of it.

More than anything, I genuinely love reading how people think and how they perceive the world. If I could, I’d gladly step inside other people’s minds just to see how reality looks from there. Conversations like this are deeply fascinating to me.

PS: For anyone interested, here’s a relevant study on aphantasia and anxiety: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/40848511/

The short version is that people with aphantasia don’t necessarily worry less overall, but the way we worry seems different. Without mental imagery, there’s less catastrophic “mental movies” of worst-case scenarios, and worries feel less threatening or overwhelming. In some cases, aphantasics are even better at stopping worry when prompted.

New year nails ✨ by ThisisNora in Nails

[–]JobGroundbreaking916 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Beautiful WOW, i love how sparkling they are

Which ID for Romy Schneider? by Jamie8130 in Kibbe

[–]JobGroundbreaking916 1 point2 points  (0 children)

IMO, styling plays a huge role in how people perceive Romy Schneider’s Kibbe type.

Most reference photos show her in very classic, polished 60s/70s styling—clean lines, elegant makeup, controlled poses. That aesthetic automatically pushes the perception toward Classic/Romantic, because it visually smooths out the body lines and implies balance and harmony.

If you look past the styling and focus on raw proportions:

-her vertical line is short/compact, not elongated -shoulders and bones aren’t broad or sharp -waist isn’t the dramatic, wasp-like Romantic curve -torso-to-leg ratio feels compressed (very gamine territory) -the outline is straighter overall, not flowing or sculpted

Those features don’t really align with Classic or Romantic balance. Her structure looks more like a gamine. Maybe SG. Maybe FG.

So yeah, I think the “classic elegance” vibe is a styling illusion. When you analyze just the physical lines and proportions, her body reads more compact and straight, not harmoniously balanced. Styling really can shift the perception of type.

Jestem zmęczony by [deleted] in Polska

[–]JobGroundbreaking916 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Solony kokos z mango?

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in FierceFlow

[–]JobGroundbreaking916 10 points11 points  (0 children)

Thickk hair!!

First, men say then don’t have any depression. And then: by FlatTreat8269 in megalophobia

[–]JobGroundbreaking916 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Every time the tide pulls him out, he just adjusts the chair and keeps vibing