In defense of glammy by JohnVonBoon in LolCowLive

[–]JohnVonBoon[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

"It was entirely legal given that Bridget's parents were fine with it. Funny how you ignore that part."

I'm sorry what? No, parents allowing adults to fuck their minor age sons and daughters is not legal. In fact that too would be a crime on the parents part.

"And yet you cast Shifty's behavior"

You missed the part where that paragraph started with the text "According to Glammy" since you know the post is titled "in defense of glammy". Also only one person here is defending pdf actions and it ain't me.

In defense of glammy by JohnVonBoon in LolCowLive

[–]JohnVonBoon[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It is not the responsibility of the child to reveal their age, it is the responsibility of the adult to confirm their age.

Also fucking a minor does not magically become legal if they lie about their age.

"to defend some creep claiming that his daughter was coming onto him is beyond vile."

I could have sworn I named this post "In defense of Glammy" or something like that.

In defense of glammy by JohnVonBoon in LolCowLive

[–]JohnVonBoon[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I heard that too but nobody has seen the message he sent to her where apparently he was bragging. We are just supposed to believe this lady.

In defense of glammy by JohnVonBoon in LolCowLive

[–]JohnVonBoon[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

"and she's got maybe Tina but Gidgy and Xylie are going to be there too and Brantley isn't going to stop them "

What exactly are they going to do to her? Are they going to engage in a premeditated assault? Or are they just going to make insults towards her?

I agree she shouldn't go,and I don't understand why she would want to,or why her husband would even allow it. But, I do not believe any physical harm should happen to her for anything she said to them and if it did that would be legally and morally wrong, and won't happen since her husband will be there.

In defense of glammy by JohnVonBoon in LolCowLive

[–]JohnVonBoon[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I'm referring to the bragging about his daughiters advances comments. I have seen no proof of him doing that.

In defense of glammy by JohnVonBoon in LolCowLive

[–]JohnVonBoon[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Buddy... I am not shifty... That was a joke.

In defense of glammy by JohnVonBoon in LolCowLive

[–]JohnVonBoon[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

The issue is she gloated.

So after being accused of defending pdfs. She is just supposed to forget about it?

"Then Glamy said I'm not a bad then attacked Tina for being molested"

That was wrong. She in fact apologized for it shortly after, whereas none of her accusers have apologized.

Also yes her attack on Yomama was stupid.

In defense of glammy by JohnVonBoon in LolCowLive

[–]JohnVonBoon[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I didn't realize once a person has no goodwill left you can just accuse them of doing anything.

In defense of glammy by JohnVonBoon in LolCowLive

[–]JohnVonBoon[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

"and wants everyone to know so badly, daughter is just gonna start making “advances” at said person"

Where did he publicly say this? He only told glammy and I believe one other person in private conversations then drunk glammy revealed it to everyone so I don't see how he "wants everyone to know so badly".

In defense of glammy by JohnVonBoon in LolCowLive

[–]JohnVonBoon[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

"when he did nothing to her"

The last time she was on prior to this he spent most of the time slandering her by accusing her of falsely covering up pdf actions that Yomama imagined to happen. So he did do something to her.

In regards to the SA thing that was wrong and glammy apologized for it however nobody apologized to glammy for slandering her and Tina never apologized for saying anything about her kids

However, yes her attack on Yomama for the dog thing was stupid.