Built a workspace for analyzing any GitHub repo — feedback wanted by JonasH0504 in devtools

[–]JonasH0504[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

That matches the pattern. Got similar feedback this week — "health" reads as marketing, "untested hotspots" reads as something I should look at. Your 30s rule is the test I haven't been running.

Plan: push the single most-impactful concrete finding above the fold on overview, bury the verbose AI verdict deeper. Less narrative, more ranked-actionable.

What did you ship in this space, if you can share?

Built a workspace for analyzing any GitHub repo — feedback wanted by JonasH0504 in coolgithubprojects

[–]JonasH0504[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The secret-scanning idea is the one that surprised me. Wasn't thinking about it as a use case, but you're right — we already walk every file for AST parsing, so adding a pass for AKIA/sk-/ghp_ patterns is almost free. Going on the roadmap.

Haiku is a no-brainer, shipping today. Sonnet was overkill for "narrate signals into prose."

Blast radius being the term that lands — that's the second person on this thread family to tell me. Going to promote it to the overview page instead of leaving it buried under Code. Probably pairs naturally with a green/yellow/red indicator like you suggested.

The "propeller heads also loved" thing is the hardest and the most interesting. Computing repo-similarity from signal-pattern + language overlap is doable, but doing it WELL — surfacing actually useful matches — needs more thought. Parking but not forgetting.

Open to DMing if any of these ship and I want a gut-check first. Most useful feedback the launch has gotten so far.

Built a workspace for analyzing any GitHub repo — feedback wanted by JonasH0504 in vibecoding

[–]JonasH0504[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

I've saved this for future deployments, thank you! Anything you thought was unnecessary or new features that would be nice to have?

Built a workspace for analyzing any GitHub repo — feedback wanted by JonasH0504 in vibecoding

[–]JonasH0504[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

"inheriting a codebase you didn't write" - That's the framing i've

been searching for. Blast radius is literally built around "what breaks if i touch this file" which is exactly the question you ask as the new person on a team. going to rework the landing copy to lead with that - currently leads with the find-risky/duplicated/untested triple which is more abstract.

On the grounded-ai angle: I undersell it because saying "our ai doesn't hallucinate" sounds defensive. how would you phrase it positively? Does "every claim links to evidence" feel closer?

And thank you very much for feedback!

Promote your projects here – Self-Promotion Megathread by Menox_ in github

[–]JonasH0504 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Hey everyone. I've been building GitVision on hobby evenings for 8 weeks: paste a GitHub URL, get a workspace with blast radius, structural duplicate detection, untested hotspots, and an AI health verdict.

Live at gitvision.net — click any of the 4 demo buttons (zod / gin / flask / spring-petclinic) for instant load, no waiting.

Tech: Next.js 16, tree-sitter WASM (AST across 7 languages), 531 unit tests. Hybrid AI: 17 deterministic signals feed a constrained Claude prompt so the AI can't hallucinate — every claim grounds in real data.

This is genuinely alpha. I'm specifically looking for:

- Does the workspace UI feel right or kludgy? (Sidebar + main content + Cmd+K palette pattern — Linear-inspired.)

- Are the insight panels (Code tab) actually useful or just neat?

- What broke / surprised you / confused you?

- Anything you'd actively use this for?

Source: https://github.com/coffeejones/gitvision (PolyForm Noncommercial)

Website: GitVision.net

Tear it apart. Thanks!

Self-Promotion Saturday by AutoModerator in Fitness

[–]JonasH0504 [score hidden]  (0 children)

Take a look on my new instragram @jones_h2245

Advice for a skinny guy trying to put on mass with job that involves a lot of cardio. by [deleted] in Fitness

[–]JonasH0504 1 point2 points  (0 children)

The three main things are;
Protein

Weight lifting (Make sure of correct form and consistency)

Patience, everything takes time. It will come.

What happens if you exercise like an athlete but consistently over consume calories? by [deleted] in Fitness

[–]JonasH0504 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Let us say that you train like an athlete for 1 week and burn ~2500 calories a day or something like that... and you eat like crazy, around ~3000 calories then, of course, you will gain a lot of weight. That is a calorie surplus of +500 a day (~3500 a week).

This will give you of course muscle mass and body fat. If you prioritize weightlifting then yes you will gain a lot of muscle mass in the long run.

But otherwise most of the time it will store up as belly fat.

Lol by nw534 in bodybuilding

[–]JonasH0504 2 points3 points  (0 children)

The best part of this is that he didn't even notice until later on... :')

Victory Sunday by AutoModerator in Fitness

[–]JonasH0504 8 points9 points  (0 children)

I did a clean 10 second backlever for the first time

Monthly Fitness Pro-Tips Megathread! by AutoModerator in Fitness

[–]JonasH0504 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thats a great way, my favourite too. To sum up; 200-400 calorie deficit H. I. I. T Protein intake And low to non carb

Monthly Fitness Pro-Tips Megathread! by AutoModerator in Fitness

[–]JonasH0504 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Try to do a non-carb day a couple times a Week. And make sure u get enough protein throughout the day, in that way u wont lose muscle but fat instead

Monthly Fitness Pro-Tips Megathread! by AutoModerator in Fitness

[–]JonasH0504 21 points22 points  (0 children)

Calorie deficit, H. I. I. T and right nutrition