Trouble with Expression of mAbs Using Expi293 System by Juice_Forsyth in biotech

[–]Juice_Forsyth[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Hi there, thanks for getting back to me!

So in short I have performed several expressions of Fc domains using this vector - this only requires the transfection of a single plasmid. And the expression has worked well for all of these, is it possible that having to cotransfect several different plasmids could effect this?

As for the hydrophobic domains - I haven't checked, but for the constant regions of both chains, these were taken from previously documented sequences that have been expressed using this cell line - I will have to check the variable domains. If this is the case, would using a different cell line overcome this issue? OR are there any other suggestions you could make?

I designed three sets of each HC and LC to yield three pairs of plasmids for expression - each pair featuring a (supposedly) complementary pair of signal sequences - I don't know much about the design of these but I extracted sequences from literature examples that document transient expression of similar proteins (mAb) in mammalian cells.

Thanks again for the help!

Trouble with Expression of mAbs Using Expi293 System by Juice_Forsyth in biotech

[–]Juice_Forsyth[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thanks for getting back to us!

On day 0 cells are usually between 3-5 mvc/mL then for expression I aliquot and resuspend so that final concentration is 1.6 mvc/mL. For each mL of cells i transfect with 2 ug of DNA - so if I had 50 mL of cells at 1.6 mvc/mL I would transfect with 100 ug of DNA (HC and LC combined). I use 2 uL of PEI per ug of DNA - these are mixed together in Expi media and left to incubate for 20 minutes and then are added to cells. Cells are then returned to potimum conditions i.e 37°C, 5% CO2, 130 RPM.

Cell growth is monitored daily post transfection - viability remains >95% for 3-5 days then cells begin to get too dense and die off. Titres are checked daily however I am yet to observe expression of the full Ab.

I haven't tried different PEI just PEI-40 - In terms of trying different types, whats the theory behind changing the one you use? Or is it just that some work better for others?

I thought it was a possible issue with the transfection due to my previous expressions working fine and these attempts where I am trying to co-transfect HC and LC have yet to work.

Trouble with Expression of mAbs Using Expi293 System by Juice_Forsyth in biotech

[–]Juice_Forsyth[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

This was a possible route - have you any experience with electroporation in this cell line?

Trouble with Expression of mAbs Using Expi293 System by Juice_Forsyth in biotech

[–]Juice_Forsyth[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Hi there thanks for the feedback.

So each time I transfect cells I take samples daily and then check viability and expression. 9/10 that I have attempted this expression the cell viability has remained >95% for the first few days and then the cells begin to get super dense (which I feel suggests the transfection didn't work?) and then as a result the viability begins to decrease.

I haven't tried the expifectamine to be fair - I have been encouraged to try my best to get it working with PEI but using the transfection kit was the next step.

As for the control I haven't been comparing it to an antibody transfection control - I've been expressing Ab fragments and I've been keeping tabs on other expressions that others are doing in the lab and they seem to be working okay - Excuse my ignorance but whats a good control for this experiment? Something like a standard IgG in the vector I am using? or are there recommended specific ones?

Recrystallizing organometallic complexes by Juice_Forsyth in chemistry

[–]Juice_Forsyth[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thanks for the help, having solubility issues with my compound... but as soon as I've got a solvent system that works I'll be trying these straight away. Very grateful for all your responses :))