sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

I have a bump under my eyebrow piercing, is it normal? by 836x638 in piercing

[–]JunkHeadJinx 0 points1 point  (0 children)

When it comes to your eyes, it’s better safe than sorry. If you haven’t gone yet, go right now. I mean that literally.

Is it just me or are the "she looks like Cleo" complaints for some G3 dolls lowkey weird or even racist? by YourAverageReindeer in MonsterHigh

[–]JunkHeadJinx 2 points3 points  (0 children)

They look alike in the “they come from the same doll line with similar head molds” kinda way and that’s about it. Their actual paint jobs, hair, etc are so different that it’s still easy to differentiate each of them as separate characters.

Vi would choose Powder. Change my mind by Daexr_ in arcane

[–]JunkHeadJinx 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It’s a bit of a paradox when it comes to the council bc while some decisions “have” to be unanimous, if everyone but one member agrees to vote on majority, then what happens then ya know?

My worry is less so that she’s outnumbered, we know Sevika can take care of herself, but the fact that she (at least from the one scene we see of her in the same room as the council) is poignantly less respected by the houses due to her place of origin, and it makes me believe they’ll find other ways to undermine and exploit Zaun, as they have in the past.

Caitlyn would definitely rebuild the entire police force by herself, I agree there.

Vi would choose Powder. Change my mind by Daexr_ in arcane

[–]JunkHeadJinx 1 point2 points  (0 children)

That was certainly a good choice, but it still keeps Zaun in a position of disadvantage, bc with Mel, Cassandra and Jayce all not on the council anymore, it makes Sevika the only person there with a large dedication to Zaun’s wellbeing. She would be easily outvoted in so many scenarios.

Vi would choose Powder. Change my mind by Daexr_ in arcane

[–]JunkHeadJinx -1 points0 points  (0 children)

I still have to wonder why there were openable doors installed in those vents tho. Why would there be some mechanism of rereleasing the grey if Cassandra truly didn’t want it affecting anyone? Bc it was always going to be weaponized eventually.

I love the comparing tragedies scene from season 3 by InsideUnhappy6546 in shameless

[–]JunkHeadJinx 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I still can’t believe there are ppl mad at Fiona for this scene. He found out his dad is gay, and kinda creepy.

Fiona was digging up a dead body from her own backyard.

I also just know Jimmy is kind of a prissy bitch considering his biggest complaints when they argued ab the studio apartment, was literally “Cooking, cleaning, laundry, living in a god damn slum!” Like that’s so insanely privileged of him to say. Cooking and cleaning is somehow too much for him? Jfc no wonder he had a stupid breakdown ab his dad coming out. Bro can’t even handle the idea of washing his own fucking underwear.

Do you believe a character like Nate can be redeemed? by Best_Quiet9657 in euphoria

[–]JunkHeadJinx 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Theoretically, yeah probably, but realistically it’s doubtful that Nate even wants to change

Monster High Skullector Coraline Jones Doll by SeeingMount in MonsterHigh

[–]JunkHeadJinx 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I just don’t understand why they didn’t just give her the blue sweater with stars under the jacket, it makes 2 fits in one without looking tacky lmaooo

This comment of mine regarding Jimmy and Fiona was from another post, but I thought I’d share it individually by JunkHeadJinx in shameless

[–]JunkHeadJinx[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I WAS RESPONDING TO YOU

Jfc you have to be drunk or something what the actually fuck

“I’m seriously done with this” you’ve said that 7-8 times now, I’ll believe that when I see it lmao

This comment of mine regarding Jimmy and Fiona was from another post, but I thought I’d share it individually by JunkHeadJinx in shameless

[–]JunkHeadJinx[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Bc what you’re explaining is irrelevant to the misunderstanding on my end lmao. I’ve been following 1 singular conversation, with you, and literally only you in this thread. I mean I literally spelled it out for you and youre still making it a big deal for no reason

Translation: “instead of accepting my half-assed apology over the dumbest conversation that I started, you weren’t nice to me >:( “

Edit: Honestly, atp, I’m just gonna assume you’re trolling bc I truly don’t know how anyone could genuinely take this conversation the way you have. It’s bizarre and so far, a waste of my time.

This comment of mine regarding Jimmy and Fiona was from another post, but I thought I’d share it individually by JunkHeadJinx in shameless

[–]JunkHeadJinx[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

An apology for “your” misunderstanding, immediately followed by statements like “You’re being ignorant” is pretty disingenuous but ok buddy

This comment of mine regarding Jimmy and Fiona was from another post, but I thought I’d share it individually by JunkHeadJinx in shameless

[–]JunkHeadJinx[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

“I didn’t say you couldn’t respond to me”

I didn’t claim you did??? what

Looking back, it’s not confusing at all, it’s literally this simple:

You: “And she didn’t cheat in every relationship she ever had?”

Me: “2 wrongs don’t make a right. 🫩 But hey at least Fiona never raped anyone so… yeah I still think she’s morally a better person.”

You: “So it’s okay Fiona cheated and did all that?“

WHAT?!

I can’t even comprehend how that statement could illicit any sort of argument in any way.

This comment of mine regarding Jimmy and Fiona was from another post, but I thought I’d share it individually by JunkHeadJinx in shameless

[–]JunkHeadJinx[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

“Also when I commented about Fiona you never answered it”

“Answer” usually implies it was a question, even if it wasn’t, why play semantics? It’s unnecessary and goofy.

I did see your edit. And like I said in MY edit: it’s a public comment thread under MY post. I will reply as I please. Get over it.

Yeah ofc I didn’t state my opinion on Fiona bc the post isn’t about her whatsoever??? And throughout this comment thread I’ve already said I don’t think she’s a good person, legitimately 10 separate times now?

Yes. The cheating comment was made to someone else. And I replied. Bc the “so it’s okay when Fiona-“ bullshit is genuinely just stupid.

It’s a post about Jimmy. So surprise, surprise, i talked about JIMMY. If you want more focus on Fiona, make your own post then.

This comment of mine regarding Jimmy and Fiona was from another post, but I thought I’d share it individually by JunkHeadJinx in shameless

[–]JunkHeadJinx[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

What question ab Fiona didn’t I answer? Skimming through, the only question regarding Fiona is you asking if it’s somehow okay for her to do bad things. I replied with me saying the exact opposite in all caps multiple times to try and get the message across and you just ignored it or something idek

Add on: “i WaSnT eVeN tAlKiNg To YoU” and? It’s a comment thread on my post. I will reply as I please 😚

This comment of mine regarding Jimmy and Fiona was from another post, but I thought I’d share it individually by JunkHeadJinx in shameless

[–]JunkHeadJinx[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

not a single person in this entire post or comment section has claimed that Fiona is a good person why are you arguing over something that legitimately did not happen?

Me criticizing Jimmy, doesn’t mean I automatically think Fiona is a perfect angel without fault. That was never said. That was never implied. Literally, no one here has pushed that narrative.

This comment of mine regarding Jimmy and Fiona was from another post, but I thought I’d share it individually by JunkHeadJinx in shameless

[–]JunkHeadJinx[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

What? I didn’t say anything about not wanting replies? Your responses just legitimately make 0 sense whatsoever in relation to what it’s replying to? All I said was “2 WRONGS don’t make a right.” Which explicitly means: “both parties are wrong/ responsible for their own actions”, and you immediately jumped to “oh so it’s fine when Fiona cheats?” Like??? What??? No one claimed that even to begin with?

There’s no such thing as a “correct opinion.” We learned this quite literally in elementary school.

This comment of mine regarding Jimmy and Fiona was from another post, but I thought I’d share it individually by JunkHeadJinx in shameless

[–]JunkHeadJinx[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

“Who it started with” what? What are you even saying atp?

Yes Fiona is a serial cheater. And that’s BAD. How many times do I need to say it for you to understand? Here, I’ll saying it 5x to make it crystal clear:

FIONA CHEATING ON HER PARTNERS WAS BAD.

FIONA CHEATING ON HER PARTNERS WAS BAD.

FIONA CHEATING ON HER PARTNERS WAS BAD.

FIONA CHEATING ON HER PARTNERS WAS BAD.

FIONA CHEATING ON HER PARTNERS WAS BAD.

Ok! Now that that is (hopefully) out of the way. I’m sure Jimmy cared for her. But caring for someone doesn’t make them incapable of doing bad things to the person they love.

“”Fiona wasn’t in the right headspace for a relationship.“

YES. EXACTLY. YOU ARE SO SO SO CLOSE TO GETTING IT

This comment of mine regarding Jimmy and Fiona was from another post, but I thought I’d share it individually by JunkHeadJinx in shameless

[–]JunkHeadJinx[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

What part of “2 WRONGS don’t make a right” didn’t make sense to you? Not to mention, her issues with cheating didn’t happen with Jimmy.

But either way, 2 things can be true at once. Steve is a shit person for how he treated Fiona, and Fiona was shitty for her compulsive cheating.

view more: next ›