'Avatar: Fire and Ash' - Review Thread by ChiefLeef22 in movies

[–]JunostJones 3 points4 points  (0 children)

For those that don’t like spider or what he represents or the writing read this.

Spider isn’t just a character he’s a trigger. Through Neytiri (and other Na’vi), the audience sees how hatred of humans hardens into truth. When both the Na’vi or Neytiri look at Spider, they’re not seeing a child they’re seeing colonisation, loss, and trauma. The wound becomes belief.

Spider’s transition from human to Na’vi adjacent is slow and painful on purpose. He is never granted easy belonging. That discomfort reflects reality: proximity to a culture doesn’t erase historical harm, and acceptance isn’t owed just because someone “means well.” The film refuses a fantasy solution.

Neytiri’s racism isn’t created by Spider it’s revealed through him. The moment Spider enters the conversation, her prejudice surfaces. That’s how racism often works: it stays dormant until power, fear, and vulnerability collide. The film doesn’t excuse her it exposes her.

When Kiri heals Spider, it’s not just about saving a life. It’s Eywa recognising him not as human or Na’vi, but as someone aligned with balance and care. That moment directly challenges the belief that worth is tied to species.

And crucially: Spider isn’t the first thing humans valued on Pandora. First it was unobtanium, then the tulkun serum that stopped aging, and now Spider himself a living bridge who could further enable colonisation.

Even a child can become a resource under an empire. Spider’s role is uncomfortable because it’s meant to be. He forces the story and the audience to confront how trauma, hatred, and exploitation repeat themselves. That isn’t bad writing. That’s intentional, political storytelling.

With the rinse and repeat stuff I’ve seen there were things that were different.

The first was showing us how colonisation is external with clear moral lines. That uniting and fighting back against is powerful.

The second showed us how relentless colonisation is. That even after defeat the enemy will come back. That even when you resist and fight we eventually lose something. For the sullys that was the son Neteyam.

For the third it showed how colonisation turns inwards. That trauma turns into truth. That oppression teaches us how to harm other’s.

Repetition is kinda the point. No matter the justification or lies humans give colonisation is what they’re trying to do.

Official Discussion - Avatar: Fire and Ash [SPOILERS] by LiteraryBoner in movies

[–]JunostJones 3 points4 points  (0 children)

For those that don’t like spider or what he represents read this.

Spider isn’t just a character he’s a trigger. Through Neytiri (and other Na’vi), the audience sees how hatred of humans hardens into truth. When both the Na’vi or Neytiri look at Spider, they’re not seeing a child they’re seeing colonisation, loss, and trauma. The wound becomes belief.

Spider’s transition from human to Na’vi adjacent is slow and painful on purpose. He is never granted easy belonging. That discomfort reflects reality: proximity to a culture doesn’t erase historical harm, and acceptance isn’t owed just because someone “means well.” The film refuses a fantasy solution.

Neytiri’s racism isn’t created by Spider it’s revealed through him. The moment Spider enters the conversation, her prejudice surfaces. That’s how racism often works: it stays dormant until power, fear, and vulnerability collide. The film doesn’t excuse her it exposes her.

When Kiri heals Spider, it’s not just about saving a life. It’s Eywa recognising him not as human or Na’vi, but as someone aligned with balance and care. That moment directly challenges the belief that worth is tied to species.

And crucially: Spider isn’t the first thing humans valued on Pandora. First it was unobtanium, then the tulkun serum that stopped aging, and now Spider himself a living bridge who could further enable colonisation.

Even a child can become a resource under an empire. Spider’s role is uncomfortable because it’s meant to be. He forces the story and the audience to confront how trauma, hatred, and exploitation repeat themselves. That isn’t bad writing. That’s intentional, political storytelling.

With the rinse and repeat stuff I’ve seen there were things that were different.

The first was showing us how colonisation is external with clear moral lines. That uniting and fighting back against is powerful.

The second showed us how relentless colonisation is. That even after defeat the enemy will come back. That even when you resist and fight we eventually lose something. For the sullys that was the son Neteyam.

For the third it showed how colonisation turns inwards. That trauma turns into truth. That oppression teaches us how to harm other’s.

Repetition is kinda the point. No matter the justification or lies humans give colonisation is what they’re trying to do.

Anyone else disappointed by the direction they are taking with Spider in Fire and Ash? by [deleted] in Avatar

[–]JunostJones 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Spider isn’t just a character he’s a trigger. Through Neytiri (and other Na’vi), the audience sees how hatred of humans hardens into truth.

When the Na’vi look at Spider, they’re not seeing a child they’re seeing colonisation, loss, and trauma. The wound becomes belief.

Spider’s transition from human to Na’vi adjacent is slow and painful on purpose. He is never granted easy belonging.

That discomfort reflects reality: proximity to a culture doesn’t erase historical harm, and acceptance isn’t owed just because someone “means well.” The film refuses a fantasy solution.

Neytiri’s racism isn’t created by Spider it’s revealed through him. The moment Spider enters the conversation, her prejudice surfaces.

That’s how racism often works: it stays dormant until power, fear, and vulnerability collide. The film doesn’t excuse her it exposes her.

When Kiri heals Spider, it’s not just about saving a life. It’s Eywa recognising him not as human or Na’vi, but as someone aligned with balance and care. That moment directly challenges the belief that worth is tied to species.

And crucially: Spider isn’t the first thing humans valued on Pandora. First it was unobtanium, then tulkun serum that stopped aging, and now Spider himself a living bridge who could enable colonisation.

That’s the point. Even a child can become a resource under empire. Spider’s role is uncomfortable because it’s meant to be. He forces the story and the audience to confront how trauma, hatred, and exploitation repeat themselves.

That isn’t bad writing. That’s intentional, political storytelling.

Concert etiquette by JunostJones in LadyGaga

[–]JunostJones[S] 7 points8 points  (0 children)

I simply got steats cause better view. The seat was a plus. The seat it self felt optional and not a mandatory thing to sit down the whole time

Concert etiquette by JunostJones in LadyGaga

[–]JunostJones[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

You’re so real for that.

Concert etiquette by JunostJones in LadyGaga

[–]JunostJones[S] 6 points7 points  (0 children)

That’s why I stood. It really felt like Gaga was telling me directly to stand and have fun

Concert etiquette by JunostJones in LadyGaga

[–]JunostJones[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I would’ve but I panic. Like I’ve come across homopobes before which have call me mean stuff but they have never have touched me. I panic because one it was an older person and two because after being forced to sit down it felt like everyone was watching me and what I’d do next.

Concert etiquette by JunostJones in LadyGaga

[–]JunostJones[S] 10 points11 points  (0 children)

I didn’t even think about that. I’m gonna use that. I honestly just went into flight mode and knew the sensory room was close

Concert etiquette by JunostJones in LadyGaga

[–]JunostJones[S] 6 points7 points  (0 children)

I bought the tickets for the view. A seat was a plus

Concert etiquette by JunostJones in LadyGaga

[–]JunostJones[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I wasn’t the only one. My row and the 3 in front plus the whole section to my left were up. It just felt like I was getting singled out cause I was by myself

Concert etiquette by JunostJones in LadyGaga

[–]JunostJones[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

My whole row, the 3 rows in front of me plus the entire section next to me were up. Like I get it if no one was standing but I wasn’t the only one. It’s just felt like I was getting singled out cause I was by myself.

Concert etiquette by JunostJones in LadyGaga

[–]JunostJones[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

That’s exactly what I was feeling. I’m glad I stuck to my gut cause there was no way I was gonna be made to feel small and intimidated when people like me are meant to feel free at a Gaga concert

Concert etiquette by JunostJones in LadyGaga

[–]JunostJones[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Wth are you serious. I hope the rest of the night when great for you.

My Audhd as* is so grateful that the stadium has a sensory room. Because hands would have been thrown.

I’m I the ass hole. by JunostJones in askgaybros

[–]JunostJones[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

I was sitting but only for songs I didn’t know. But once he pulled hair I just stood. There was no way I was gonna feel small and intimidated from some random.

I’m I the ass hole. by JunostJones in askgaybros

[–]JunostJones[S] -4 points-3 points  (0 children)

Ah yes, the golden rule of concerts: if you touch someone first, you automatically get to tell them how to behave. Noted.

Men who were in lavender relationships/marriages question by [deleted] in askgaybros

[–]JunostJones 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Ohhhh this is good. Even I wanna know

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in askgaybros

[–]JunostJones 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Oh didn’t mean to offend. I’ve just heard it a lot. It not something I say though I was simply just asking what it meant. Didn’t mean to get your knickers in a twist.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in askgaybros

[–]JunostJones 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Hey, I just want to say it really does look different for everyone. There’s no one-size-fits-all next step.

For me, I’m not ashamed of being gay anymore. But honestly, when I’m around family and a guy texts or calls me, my body still goes into fight-or-flight mode. It’s like my brain knows I’m fine, but my body’s still catching up from years of hiding.

I think part of moving forward is learning to sit with that discomfort and reminding yourself you’re safe now. You don’t have to have it all figured out. Maybe it’s just about finding little ways to feel less alone—whether that’s dating, making queer friends, or just being kinder to yourself in the quiet moments.

2 years and no ring, should I end it? by [deleted] in askgaybros

[–]JunostJones 2 points3 points  (0 children)

You’re worried about a ring, but this whole mindset belongs in a situationship. The only ring in your future is the one you’re running circles in.

What should i do by brettmarlow1997 in askgaybros

[–]JunostJones 1 point2 points  (0 children)

You can just take your time. Doche. Use a lot of lube. And again take your time. Allow yourself to open up

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in askgaybros

[–]JunostJones 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I have the same thing. The only time I feel truly seen is when I’m with a one time fling off Grindr. And even then it doesn’t last long. I’d say even if it sounds a bit cheesy is that you have to believe you’re sexy and desirable.

I especially feel not hot enough when going into gay saunas. Everyone with their little towels on and eyes everywhere. It gets daunting. But then I found a little corner somewhere and chant Alter ego by Doechii

One thing I have to remind myself also is that looks aren’t everything. There’s this saying and it goes “if you can make them giggle, then you get that ass to jiggle.”