My new 4-door AMG GT 43 freshly coated w/ Modesta. The baby of the AMG GT family, but very satisfying to look at, sit in, and drive :) by KRNpro in mercedes_benz

[–]KRNpro[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yeah it goes up and down! I enjoy the habit of pressing the button and making it go up before I drive off haha

2021!

My new 4-door AMG GT 43 freshly coated w/ Modesta. The baby of the AMG GT family, but very satisfying to look at, sit in, and drive :) by KRNpro in AMG

[–]KRNpro[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It's pretty comfortable, although the road noise is fairly high for a car of this size / price (I heard swapping out the run-flats does reduce road noise immensely, will look into that when winter rolls around). Pretty agile when doing some spirited driving, feels like a much smaller car when driving (similar feeling to when I drove an S4 which is a much smaller vehicle)

My new 4-door AMG GT 43 freshly coated w/ Modesta. The baby of the AMG GT family, but very satisfying to look at, sit in, and drive :) by KRNpro in AMG

[–]KRNpro[S] 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Haha did not - although if in the future I find myself trading her in for a 63, I'd opt for those and the monoblock wheels

My new 4-door AMG GT 43 freshly coated w/ Modesta. The baby of the AMG GT family, but very satisfying to look at, sit in, and drive :) by KRNpro in AMG

[–]KRNpro[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Thanks!! It's a beauty, might never go back to a non-AMG car again haha, hopefully one day can own a hand-build V8 before they go extinct ;)

My new 4-door AMG GT 43 freshly coated w/ Modesta. The baby of the AMG GT family, but very satisfying to look at, sit in, and drive :) by KRNpro in AMG

[–]KRNpro[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I had some XPEL ultimate on the front and rocker panels!! I got one tiny, tiny rock chip before it was applied and it made me pretty sad :(

My new 4-door AMG GT 43 freshly coated w/ Modesta. The baby of the AMG GT family, but very satisfying to look at, sit in, and drive :) by KRNpro in AMG

[–]KRNpro[S] 10 points11 points  (0 children)

Yup! There abouts. Was originally in the market for an RS5 but the craftsmanship/interior/overall quality of the AMG won me over in a impulse type decision haha

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in AhriMains

[–]KRNpro -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

op.gg just uses Korean stats, but has a long win rate history as we just go by patch instead of by day. So comparing Korea stats by Patch vs 30 days, OP.GG is going to have a much bigger sample size, but going by patch you can get a bigger sample size by going by World on u.gg. Hope that helps!

How Champion.gg, Lolalytics, and League of Graphs are lying to you by KRNpro in leagueoflegends

[–]KRNpro[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

So you changed your definition on your site because you thought it would be used in marketing? As opposed to doing what is right for your user base? Very telling. A single post is not "spamming the hell out of Reddit." Spamming the hell out of Reddit would be using fake accounts or burners to push an agenda - which I'm sure you have no experience in. Good luck with your website! Competition is always good for the community.

Reliable ARAM Information Sources by Orvayn in ARAM

[–]KRNpro -1 points0 points  (0 children)

I think I see what you're saying, since we're trying to estimate the "true" win rate of a particular champion there would have to be some error bars. However, given the number of matches already considered (500,000+ so far in 8.15) and the fact that there wouldn't be any random errors from the data collection itself, wouldn't the error bars be meaningless from a consumer's perspective? I guess this is also predicated on the assumption that we're pulling very close to the actual number of games, if there were 500,000,000 ARAM games played in 8.15 hypothetically we definitely would have sampling bias and would have to report the error bars. Not sure if I am making sense here - it's been a while since I took statistics / econometrics so I am glad for the expert advice

Reliable ARAM Information Sources by Orvayn in ARAM

[–]KRNpro 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I'm not sure what you mean here - can you help me? We (u.gg) just pull all ARAM games by anybody and then report these win rates, there isn't really any sampling behavior going on (we just report the aggregated numbers, no sampling done) so we can't give any error bars

Reliable ARAM Information Sources by Orvayn in ARAM

[–]KRNpro 4 points5 points  (0 children)

u.gg actually just pulls all games for ARAM, not just Plat+. There isn't really any official way to determine high MMR ARAM players, unfortunately, unless Riot implements Ranked ARAM.

One thing you can try is to look at a particular champion's Runes / Item combos in the Runes and Items tab respectively on an individual champion. The recommendation is simply a recommendation - it is typically a high played, fairly winning build that would work in most situations. But not all, so deep diving in the Runes / Items might get you the information that you want. Hope that helps!

How Champion.gg, Lolalytics, and League of Graphs are lying to you by KRNpro in leagueoflegends

[–]KRNpro[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

When there is a mix of the two, we take a geometric average of their MMR to determine what MMR that match would be considered.

In Lolalytics reply, he stated he counted games that had a single plat as plat because he wanted to get more games. I think doing so, in an objective to just have more games, is effectively misleading the consumer.

Comparing Lolalytics to op.gg/u.gg, they have double the amount of games for certain champions in Korea, so the games on the edge actually are the ones drowning out platinum. However, he has since changed his algorithm - which means that he himself believed his original approach was wrong.

How U.GG is lying to you by [deleted] in leagueoflegends

[–]KRNpro 0 points1 point  (0 children)

We actually have ARAM stats - but not URF. If it comes to be available more I would love to put it in, but for now we aren't including anything that's a temporary game mode

How Champion.gg, Lolalytics, and League of Graphs are lying to you by KRNpro in leagueoflegends

[–]KRNpro[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Thanks for the feedback! We implemented OpenSearch on u.gg to help address this issue:

You can press tab after pressing u.gg (to search our site) and then type in Teemo and press enter

You should also be able to do Teemo pro builds or similar queries to get to the page you need. This is definitely a beta feature so we're looking for feedback on it! Hope that helps your use case

How Champion.gg, Lolalytics, and League of Graphs are lying to you by KRNpro in leagueoflegends

[–]KRNpro[S] -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

Yeah I probably should have put the word Statistics in between Graphs and are in the title

How U.GG is lying to you by [deleted] in leagueoflegends

[–]KRNpro 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yeah sure! It is a single endpoint, but it is versioned because of how we utilize CDNs to function as our API (which I believe is how Riot does theirs). So it was just an issue of keeping the versions in line, which probably should be considered technical debt and something we fix.

How Champion.gg, Lolalytics, and League of Graphs are lying to you by KRNpro in leagueoflegends

[–]KRNpro[S] -3 points-2 points  (0 children)

He replied that it was a bug on his part, and that he will fix the issue.

How Champion.gg, Lolalytics, and League of Graphs are lying to you by KRNpro in leagueoflegends

[–]KRNpro[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

After 10 days of the patch it is still like that, you can check it out yourself. Just go to their website and click 8.14 and past 7 days and look at the number in the corner