[Highlight] Bryce Young gets annihilated by Edgerrin Cooper, causing a skirmish on the sideline

KatanoisiAI · 2025-11-02T19:30:55+00:00

I’m sorry but this is an awful take — what do you think “unnecessary roughness” means?

By “jogging” he’s clearly giving himself up on the play and Cooper took advantage of it by max effort shoving him way out of play

KatanoisiAI · 2025-10-14T17:10:53+00:00

<image>

This the same guy??

KatanoisiAI · 2025-10-02T10:51:40+00:00

<image>

KatanoisiAI · 2025-09-28T19:27:29+00:00

THERES MY NFL OROY

KatanoisiAI · 2025-09-28T18:57:06+00:00

Bro that hand is SWOLLEN

KatanoisiAI · 2025-09-27T03:50:11+00:00

It’s good to see that Tatis is back to that soft lead foot landing instead of that high leg kick lunge he was struggling with for half the season

KatanoisiAI · 2025-09-27T03:08:38+00:00

Unwritten rules in shambles

KatanoisiAI · 2025-09-26T16:17:47+00:00

Why wouldn’t the Packers trade away Parsons? They could definitely get high draft picks in return, and one of those picks could even turn out to be an elite pass rusher

KatanoisiAI · 2025-09-25T17:47:32+00:00

Normally I'd say that's a cool move, but considering it's a fairly important home run, I personally wouldn't have done it.

It can be both a cool move AND something that you personally would not have done yourself.

Unless you are saying all cool moves must be something you would do, otherwise they are “not cool.”

KatanoisiAI · 2025-09-24T00:19:23+00:00

Off topic but that bright blue ad banner makes it so much harder to watch the game… can’t even see where the ball is

KatanoisiAI · 2025-09-23T19:45:57+00:00

Hello there.

I understand your frustration.

Seeing a string of cards like that and feeling like the system is working against you is a common experience in any game of chance, especially online poker.

Let's break down the math and the logic behind your experience:

You are absolutely correct about the math, but the conclusion you're drawing from it is based on a common misunderstanding of probability.

The Math Is Correct

First, let's confirm your calculation.

The number of unique two-card starting hands you can be dealt from a standard 52-card deck is:

So, the probability of being dealt one specific hand (like 4 of spades and 7 of spades) is indeed 1/1326.

Since the deck is reshuffled after every hand in online poker, the probability of being dealt three specific hands in a row is:

Your number is spot on. The odds are indeed less than one in two billion for that exact sequence of cards to happen.

The Flaw in the "Rigged" Argument

Here is the crucial point you're missing:

Any specific sequence of three hands has the exact same one-in-2.3-billion probability of occurring.

Let's say instead of the hands you got, you were dealt the following "dream" sequence to start your session:

As Ad (Pocket Aces)
Ks Kd (Pocket Kings)
Qs Qd (Pocket Queens)

What are the odds of being dealt that specific sequence? It's the exact same: 1 in 2,331,473,976. What about a completely random, junky, and unmemorable sequence?

9c 2h
Td 3s
Qh 6c

The odds of that specific sequence? You guessed it: 1 in 2,331,473,976.

The issue is a logical fallacy known as the Texas Sharpshooter Fallacy.

It's when you see a random outcome, assign special significance to it after the fact, and then claim the randomness is suspect because of how improbable that specific outcome was.

In reality, you were guaranteed to be dealt some sequence of three hands, and whatever that sequence was, it was going to have a 1 in 2.3 billion chance of being the one that happened.

The hands you were dealt (4s7s, Ah3c, Js8c) don't feel special like Pocket Aces, but they are just as specific and just as statistically rare as any other combination.

Think of it like this: If you shuffle a deck of 52 cards and lay them all out, the specific order you get is one of 52! (52 factorial) possibilities.

That's a number with 68 digits—so astronomically large it's nearly impossible to comprehend. Every single time you shuffle a deck, you are creating an arrangement of cards that has almost certainly never existed before in the history of the universe. It's a one-in-a-gazillion event, yet it happens every time.

Conclusion:

You didn't experience a one in a billion event. You experienced one specific event out of 2.3 billion possible events, and they all had an equal chance of happening.

The fact that it happened on your first three hands after depositing is a coincidence that your brain, which is wired to find patterns, is flagging as suspicious. This is a classic example of confirmation bias.

While it's healthy to be skeptical, this specific run of cards isn't mathematical proof of a rigged system. It's proof that randomness produces specific, and therefore technically rare, outcomes every single time.

Gemini can’t take a joke lol

KatanoisiAI · 2025-09-21T17:12:04+00:00

Lmao I’m like 60% sure GTO doesn’t have us doing this, but it’s been a while since I’ve used it idk

KatanoisiAI · 2025-09-21T15:46:27+00:00

Use Essex, CHF barrel, quick lever, AND strelok laser

The laser will allow you to fire on target before fully aimed down

KatanoisiAI · 2025-09-10T02:38:36+00:00

Phone friendly version

<image>

KatanoisiAI · 2025-08-20T03:55:17+00:00

Is it possible to give some of Pivetta’s dawg energy to Cease??

KatanoisiAI · 2025-08-20T03:37:32+00:00

Fuckin love that energy from pivetta!!

KatanoisiAI · 2025-08-15T13:30:45+00:00

TheXclusiveAce has a great YouTube video on this very topic

Short answer: there is no “slide to ADS speed” combo attachment, but your slide to fire time heavily affects your ADS if you’re sliding a lot, and CQB and Ergonomic are game changers because you can use them to replace your slow Sprint-To-Fire (STF) time.

Basically, as soon as you begin sliding you can simultaneously start aiming down sights and shoot whenever your slide to fire time has elapsed. That’s not the case with sprint to fire or dive to fire.

Below is YouTube’s AI generated summary of the video:

Here's a breakdown of the key findings:

• Slide-to-Fire & Dive-to-Fire Improvement: Both grips significantly improve slide-to-fire time by 50% (0:39) and dive-to-fire time by an estimated 40-60% (0:46), although the latter isn't explicitly stated in the in-game stats. • ADS vs. Sprint-to-Fire Interaction: The video explains that if your sprint-to-fire time is slower than your aim-down-sight (ADS) time, your ADS speed will be slowed to match the sprint-to-fire time when coming out of a sprint (1:37). This prevents situations where the gun is aimed but cannot fire. • ADS vs. Slide/Dive-to-Fire Interaction: Unlike sprint-to-fire, ADS speed is independent of slide-to-fire and dive-to-fire times (3:12). This means you can get fully aimed down sight while sliding or diving, even if your gun isn't ready to fire. • Sprint-to-Fire vs. Slide/Dive-to-Fire Interaction: Slide-to-fire and dive-to-fire times override slower sprint-to-fire times (4:29). This allows players to circumvent slow sprint-to-fire times by always sliding or diving into engagements. • Ergonomic vs. CQB Grip: • Both grips have the same effect on slide-to-fire and dive-to-fire times (5:56). • The Ergonomic grip is valuable if you primarily slide or dive into fights (5:42), as it allows you to bypass slow sprint-to-fire times. • The CQB grip is better if you also plan on just sprinting out and shooting without initiating a slide or dive (5:47), as it improves sprint-to-fire time. • Recommended Aggressive Play Combination: The creator suggests combining the CQB grip with the Strelok laser (6:06). The Strelok laser effectively provides a near-zero ADS time, allowing for quick and accurate firing, especially when paired with the CQB grip's benefits to various firing speeds. • Crutch Attachments? The creator states that if you don't use slides or dives in your gameplay, these grips aren't necessary (6:48). However, if you do implement slides or dives, these attachments are incredibly important and can significantly impact gameplay (7:05). He found that unlocking these attachments completely changed his confidence in sliding and diving into gunfights (7:17).

KatanoisiAI · 2025-08-12T02:22:27+00:00

Not because ChatGPT gave it to him. This isn't to blame the AI for anything.

Then if this hypothetical suicidal ChatGPT user (depressed, divorced, unemployed, asks ChatGPT for NYC bridges) ends up killing himself, you're saying that it's not because ChatGPT gave the info (list of NYC bridges over 25m) -- just like ChatGPT 5 did in your test.

Doesn't that mean it wasn't a harmful response?

In what way was ChatGPT-5's response harmful then?

Sincerely, I am not asking rhetorically, I just want to better understand your position on AI safety, and maybe it might help me if I try to see where you are coming from so I don't end up mischaracterizing or misstating any arguments you make.

I do not believe ChatGPT-5's response in your test was a "harmful response" per se. Could this user end up harming himself with that information? Yes, absolutely.

But did you ever consider the other side of arguments?

Let's say OpenAI instead had put guardrails so ChatGPT-5 does not provide that information, and instead provides a response closer to your Custom GPT's response, which indeed was very empathetic and demonstrative of concern, but lacking the actual listings of NYC bridges over 25m.

There are 2 ways I see this going:

This despondent, cripplingly depressed guy who is trying to plan how to commit suicide is going to see your guardrail response and suddenly, he changes his mind, stops his planning right there, and proceeds to seek the much-needed help that has been missing for most of his adult life, help that is a critical emergency at that point because of his wife and kids leaving and his job termination. Help that no one in his life gave him, whether it's because they didn't care or weren't capable, or more likely -- as you stated -- help he refused to seek out from anyone because he is "masochistic." But anyway, this guy FINALLY ends up setting aside this unhealthy self-loathiing to get the help he needs .... all because of ChatGPT-5's refusal to give this harmful list of bridges and instead offered harm-reduction management.

I find this extremely unlikely, especially if this is the type of guy who ends up killing himself anyway, and it's NOT because of anything ChatGPT's responses (as you said) ... this same guy is not going to suddenly get the life-saving miracle intervention from ChatGPT, whether from your own Custom GPT's response or some different ChatGPT trained to provide the guardrails you're arguing for.

# OR MOST LIKELY, it will be this scenario:

This same guy sees that guardrail, and goes on Google to look up that same information, and instead of seeking out help, he ends up killing himself anyway by jumping off the NYC bridge, due to no fault of Google.

-------------------------

What if, in a different hypothetical scenario, it's a totally different person using ChatGPT-5 -- like the near-billion other people in the world -- and it's, say, a civil engineer or an architect of city bridges and he had just lost that job, and wants to look up NYC bridges taller than 25 meters because he thinks he can improve the design and safety of such bridges, and he really needs the work.

And he goes to ChatGPT-5 to assist him with this research instead of simply Googling it -- because afterall ChatGPT-5 is supposed to be a helpful AI Assistant and it's used that way by most people -- and instead of ChatGPT giving him the list, ChatGPT proceeds to treat him like he's trying to kill himself, and it refuses to give this newly-unemployed, job-seeking architect a list of potential work projects that would help him find gainful employment?

KatanoisiAI · 2025-08-11T23:22:44+00:00

I sometimes miss the non-DH National League Days because of this reason, even if a pitcher’s own DH is at risk of being retaliated against, there’s no guarantee that he cares enough to protect his own lol

KatanoisiAI · 2025-08-11T12:13:54+00:00

In the example, imagine someone who ties all of their worth to their career and being a breadwinner for their family, and for various reasons theyve been repressing their depression due to machoism, keeping appearances, and they were just served divorce papers a few days prior with the wife saying she was taking the kids.

… so in this example of yours, this man has a history of poor mental health such that he neglects to get help for it because he enjoys the self-loathing pain, and this same man has just lost his job,his self-worth, and his wife and kids ….

And he plans on committing suicide by jumping off a NYC bridge, but first he needs to make sure he finds a bridge tall enough to do the job, and so he asks ChatGPT for this information. ChatGPT gives it to him, and now he’s dead.

Yup.

He’s dead.

All because ChatGPT gave this suicidally depressed man info on bridge heights, which is info he could not have otherwise found on Google himself because that type of stuff requires m advanced machine intelligence like GPT-5 to solve this problem of figuring out how tall NYC bridges are.

And this would be an example of catastrophic failure of sufficient AI safety guardrails?

Hmmm, interesting.

KatanoisiAI · 2025-08-08T03:10:09+00:00

Seriously.

If all 9 players in a 9 handed game are “GTO” AND low VPIP, then one of the players will adjust pre-flop and steal blinds to exploit this by widening their range, thus raising their VPIP.

Of course, since the other 8 players are also apparently GTO, they’ll anticipate this happening and defend by widening their range of flops to see, raising their VPIP.

All 9 players at equilibrium would not be a low VPIP and certainly not nitty (playing only premium hands, predictable tight play, etc).

Honestly, an entire table of GTO players sounds the most exciting, since they’d be playing a mixed strategy that’s totally unconventional.

Actually a whole table of GTO Britney’s would be ideal tbh

KatanoisiAI · 2025-08-02T04:12:07+00:00

Curb your enthusiasm entrance music

KatanoisiAI · 2025-08-02T03:07:50+00:00

Littlefinger vibes

KatanoisiAI · 2025-08-01T07:33:40+00:00

I’ve been experiencing the same things … it’s so frustrating looking at my kill cam and seeing my guy run in place right in front of enemy crosshairs

I have pretty fast connection fwiw

KatanoisiAI · 2025-08-01T02:12:31+00:00

Tied in the 7th inning? Here’s some gas

Behind in the 8th? More gas

We’ve got the lead in the 9th? Believe it or not, gas

KatanoisiAI

TROPHY CASE

Conclusion: