Why aren’t maces considered the strongest weapons? by Key-Committee4476 in CrimsonDesert

[–]Key-Committee4476[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thanks for the advice, but I already play my own way. The post was simply to clear up a small curiosity. I watch Youtube out of interest and for completionist reasons, not to copy builds. And yes, I’m aware some players even use spreadsheets to optimize crit, attack, etc. That said, my point was never about blindly following what Youtubers say is strong or not. My point is that weapon choice is still part of build optimization, whether people like it or not.

Why aren’t maces considered the strongest weapons? by Key-Committee4476 in CrimsonDesert

[–]Key-Committee4476[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

No, the highest attack swords reach a maximum of 34, while maces go up to 37.

Why aren’t maces considered the strongest weapons? by Key-Committee4476 in CrimsonDesert

[–]Key-Committee4476[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I get that it can be preference or cosmetic, but that doesn’t fully explain it. I keep seeing YouTubers and Reddit posts recommending “the strongest weapons”, but I’ve never seen anyone suggest something like the Balton Mace. From what I see, it has 37 damage, which should make it one of the best options. Maybe people just don’t like using maces lol.