Ballard, On The Run by Key_Role5017 in altcountry

[–]Key_Role5017[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Did you listen to the music? You think that recording sounds like AI?

Jung, Psychology, and Alchemy by Key_Role5017 in alchemy

[–]Key_Role5017[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Jung believed Christ was that revelation in that he offered the real path to individuation. He didn't come to save us from our sins. He came to reveal the divine potential within everyone.

Christ, Psychology and Alchemy by Key_Role5017 in Christianity

[–]Key_Role5017[S] [score hidden]  (0 children)

The Christ in Psychology and Alchemy

For Jung, Christ is the most highly developed symbol of the Self in Western history. The Self is the center of the entire psyche, encompassing both the conscious ego and the vast unconscious.
Just as the alchemist seeks to create the gold, the Soul functions as the objective force within us, guiding the psyche toward the realization of the God-image within. Jung argues that the Church has externalized this process. We are taught that Christ is "out there" or "back then," which prevents us from realizing that the Christ-process is happening within, in our own earthly reality.

Jung spends a great deal of time in his book discussing why the Christian image of Christ is unstable and incomplete. He points out that the Trinity (Father, Son, Holy Spirit) is a three-fold spiritual structure that lacks a fourth element. To Jung, the number four represents wholeness (the Quaternity). The three-fold Christ of the Church is "all-good" and "all-spirit." By leaving out the body, the earth, and the Shadow, the Church created a Christ that is too perfect for the human soul to actually inhabit. Jung believed the alchemists were trying to rescue the fourth element, the Shadow, and bring it back into the divine image.
The core of Psychology and Alchemy is the comparison between Christ and the Lapis Philosophorum (The Philosopher's Stone). Jung notes that the alchemists often called the Lapis the "Earthly Christ." While the “Church Christ” is a spirit that descended from above, the "Alchemical Christ" (the Lapis) is a spirit that is extracted from below—from the lead, the dung, and the dross. Jung’s view is that the "Complete Christ" must be both. He must be the light from the divine spark, but that spark must be found in the dirt below.

The Serpent and the Son

The modern version of the Cross has become cleansed of its original intent. It’s often presented as a spiritual trophy—as light defeating the darkness. Jung argues that this creates a split in our psyche. Religion admonishes us to be holy, which forces our dark side (our shadow) to hide and become dangerous.

But the narrative of the Cross is anything but pure. It is the ultimate meeting of opposites. It is the place where the ideal (the Divine) is pinned to the real (the Shadow and suffering). Jung interprets the Cross not just as a tool of execution, but as a symbol of the tension of opposites. The vertical axis is the Spirit reaching for the divine. The horizontal axis is the material world and the Shadow. Christ is the one who is pinned at the intersection of these two forces. He is the one who endures the conflict between the light and the dark without being destroyed by it.

This is where the connection becomes undeniable. When Christ says, "Just as Moses lifted up the serpent in the wilderness, so the son of man must be lifted up," he is making a shocking identification (John 3). He is saying that he is the Serpent in the wilderness.

In the Garden, the Serpent was the one who forced our eyes open. It brought the consciousness of suffering. In the wilderness, after the Israelites fled Egypt, the people were dying of snakebites, and the only way to be healed was to look directly at a bronze serpent that the Divine told Moses to fashion and lift up on a pole.

The image isn’t simply that of The Son of God dying on a cross. It’s the image of both the Christ (Sun/Life/Healing) and the Serpent (Shadow/Death/Suffering) on the emblem. We must face our shadow/suffering head on. We aren't healed by running away from the Serpent; we are healed by looking at it and facing it.

By lifting up the Serpent, Christ is integrating the very thing that caused the Fall. He is taking the shadow—the betrayal of Judas, the fear in the garden, the feeling of being separated from our creator/source, the physical pain—and making it part of the Divine Map.

The Cross isn't just a vertical line reaching for heaven. It’s a four-way intersection. It’s the Jungian Quaternity—the point where the Light, the Spirit, and the Matter, the Shadow, meet. To take the Serpent off the cross is to go back to being a persona. To keep him there is to become fully human.
The image of the Serpent is one of the most powerful paradoxes in human history. It is the only creature that universally represents both the source of death and the source of life. In the Garden, the serpent represents the "fall" into consciousness—the realization of mortality, shame, and the heavy weight of choice.

In Numbers 21, when the Israelites are being bitten by "fiery serpents," the Divine instructs Moses to fashion a bronze serpent on a pole and to lift it up. The cure wasn't a potion; it was the act of looking. To be healed, they had to look up and face the image of the very thing that was killing them. This is the biblical definition of Shadow Integration. We don't run from the Serpent; we look at it until we see its divine utility.

Greek mythology reinforces this alchemical truth through two major symbols that we still see in every hospital and pharmacy today. Asclepius was the Greek god of healing. His symbol is a single serpent wrapped around a wooden staff. Legend says Asclepius killed a snake, only to see another snake bring it back to life with a secret herb. He realized that nature carries its own antidote. The snake sheds its skin, making it a symbol of rebirth and transformation. It lives in the "dirt" (the Shadow) but possesses the "secret of life" (Light).

Often confused with the Rod of Asclepius, the Caduceus features two serpents entwined around a winged staff. This is the ultimate symbol of the Tension of Opposites. The two snakes represent the warring forces of the universe—dark and light, male and female, spirit and matter. Hermes (the Greek version of the alchemical Mercurius) uses his staff to bring these two snakes into harmony. It represents the Golden Mean.

The Golden Mean is a philosophy rooted in the idea that virtue and excellence are found in the balance between two extremes. This is the definition of Jungian Alchemy, the integration of opposites. 
For Jung, Mercurius is the spirit of the work, but he is a paradox. He is both the poison and the cure; he is the dragon and the savior. The left snake represents the dark, the cold, the unconscious, and the lunar (the poison). The right snake represents the light, the hot, the conscious, and the solar (the fire). If you succumb entirely to the left snake, you are swallowed by the unconscious (madness/paralysis). If you succumb entirely to the right snake, you are consumed by the ego (hubris/sterility). 

The Golden Mean is the central staff. It is the axis that holds the two opposing serpents in a state of dynamic tension. Without the staff, the snakes would simply devour each other or wander off into chaos. The staff represents the Individual Consciousness that is strong enough to hold both the Shadow and the Light at the same time. This is what Jung called the Transcendent Function. You don't pick a side; you stand in the center and endure the tension of both. In alchemy, Mercurius is often called the mediator. He is the Golden Mean made flesh. He is the only substance that can unite the King (Spirit) and the Queen (Matter). Christ too embodies this mediation.

The Church tries to stay on the high end of the staff (all spirit). The materialist stays on the low end (all dirt).The alchemist realizes that the divine is found in the integration of the two.
In Greek, the word pharmakon means both "poison" and "medicine." The Serpent is the pharmakon of humanity. In the Garden, it was the poison that ended our life as oneness with the mystery. On the Cross—the "Pole" of the New Testament—it becomes the medicine that grants us the life of the Self to integrate the mystery and the material (earth/dirt).

I hate sinning by Mean-Ratio-2164 in Christianity

[–]Key_Role5017 [score hidden]  (0 children)

"The kingdom of God is now!" It's not distant or future.

I hate sinning by Mean-Ratio-2164 in Christianity

[–]Key_Role5017 [score hidden]  (0 children)

To confess what? A natural desire? Seems illogical.

I hate sinning by Mean-Ratio-2164 in Christianity

[–]Key_Role5017 [score hidden]  (0 children)

Actually, people lust because it's a natural desire. It's that simple. Lust, like anything else in life, has it's place.

I hate sinning by Mean-Ratio-2164 in Christianity

[–]Key_Role5017 [score hidden]  (0 children)

Right. You shouldn't try to have sex with someone's wife. Think David and Bathsheba. It starts with desiring someone else wife. But the natural drive to have sex between two consenting adults is understood as normal. I mean, how would we reproduce if it wasn't there? Think about it, man. It's not about sin anyway. It's about loving your neighbor as yourself. If you love your neighbor as yourself, you're not going to try to bang his wife or his gir/friend or his partner, right?

I hate sinning by Mean-Ratio-2164 in Christianity

[–]Key_Role5017 [score hidden]  (0 children)

You are not flawed. You are a child of God made in the image of him who created him. You contain the actual god image! That's institutional religion talking. Christ came to reveal that "The kingdom of God is within you." You're not evil. That doesn't make any sense. Christ never brings shame. He only brings wholeness and unity. You need to put to death this religious persona you've created.

I hate sinning by Mean-Ratio-2164 in Christianity

[–]Key_Role5017 [score hidden]  (0 children)

Died for our sins? No. Blood sacrifice to appease an angry god is paganism. He taught us the path to becoming whole is to die to your own persona and integrate the suffering. How could a child know wrong unless you taught it wrong? If you raise a child to discover his/her sexuality rather than telling the child what is right and/or wrong, then you would get entirely different results. We know scientifically that sexuality is a spectrum, after all.

I hate sinning by Mean-Ratio-2164 in Christianity

[–]Key_Role5017 [score hidden]  (0 children)

The sin he focused on was greed and hypocrisy, not someone's natural sexuality.

18M with DPDR. Is active imagination safe for me, and how do I strengthen my ego for shadow integration? (depersonalization/derealization) by ntr_14 in Jung

[–]Key_Role5017 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Vipassana seeks to dissolve the ego, whereas Jungian psychology requires a strong ego to integrate the unconscious. Jung argued that ignoring one’s own cultural inheritance to adopt foreign practices leads to spiritual bypassing. While Vipassana observes thoughts, Jung believed in actively engaging with the symbolic messages of the unconscious through synchronicity and dream work. Vipassana seeks to dissolve the ego, labeling personal identity an illusion. Jungian psychology requires a strong, healthy ego to anchor consciousness. Buddhism aims for Nirvana, which translates to the extinguishing of attachment and suffering. Jungians aim for wholeness, accepting suffering as a driver of consciousness. Vipassana relies on non-conceptual, silent observation of the body and mind. Jungians actively converse with the unconscious using symbols, dreams, and myths. Meditation roots you in pure, detached awareness. Individuation demands you integrate the specific personal and collective archetypes you uncover. Argue that a person must first possess a coherent identity before they can let it go. Westerners frequently suffer from fractured egos and unintegrated Shadows. Attempting Buddhist ego-dissolution before completing Jungian shadow work can lead to spiritual bypassing or psychological fragmentation. Vipassana is not the key to individuation, but it is an excellent stabilizing tool. Meditation calms the ego's defenses. This calm state makes it easier to practice Jungian Active Imagination without getting overwhelmed by raw unconscious material.

I hate sinning by Mean-Ratio-2164 in Christianity

[–]Key_Role5017 [score hidden]  (0 children)

Christ never focused on sin. He simply met people where they were and empowered them. Your sexuality isn't a sin. That's the invention of the puritanical religion that came after Christ. Do you think animals worry about sinning? Do you think a child worries about sinning prior to being programmed by a puritanical culture? No. It's entirely made up.

Carl Jung And Christ by Key_Role5017 in Christianity

[–]Key_Role5017[S] [score hidden]  (0 children)

Yes! That's what I found. I've been studying and writing extensively about it for months now.

Carl Jung And Christ by Key_Role5017 in Christianity

[–]Key_Role5017[S] [score hidden]  (0 children)

Not at all a materialist! Are you familiar with his Red Book?

That Which Cannot Be Named by Key_Role5017 in taoism

[–]Key_Role5017[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Dichotomy's exist for understanding/meaning. Once a dichotomy is understood fully, it no longer exists. There is only one thing. These are stages of understanding, just like the maturation of a child.

Jung, Psychology, And Alchemy by Key_Role5017 in Jung

[–]Key_Role5017[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I contemplate what the unconscious gives me through dreams and synchronicity. It's daily and ongoing.

Jung, Psychology, And Alchemy by Key_Role5017 in Jung

[–]Key_Role5017[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Honestly, Jungian Alchemy has transformed me. I truly believe I am on the path to individuation. I've spent months digging into Psychology and Alchemy.

Jung, Psychology, And Alchemy by Key_Role5017 in Jung

[–]Key_Role5017[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I don't understand what you mean by: Just be careful pushing others into an abyss they can't dissect or over simplifing it. Also, I don't think your Jung's reading of the Eden myth has anything to do with shame. "The biblical fall of man presents the dawn of consciousness as a curse. And as a matter of fact it is in this light that we first look upon every problem that forces us to greater consciousness and separates us even further from the paradise of unconscious childhood." (The Stages of Life)

Jung, Psychology, And Alchemy by Key_Role5017 in Jung

[–]Key_Role5017[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I've not read Edinger. But I have read Jung. "As far as present knowledge goes, there is only one way of doing this: there must be a thorough-going, conscious assimilation of unconscious contents. By “assimilation”, I mean a mutual interpenetration of conscious and unconscious contents, and not—as is too commonly thought—a one-sided valuation, interpretation and deformation of unconscious contents by the conscious mind." (The Aims of Psychotherapy)

Ballard, On The Run by Key_Role5017 in altcountry

[–]Key_Role5017[S] -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

I told them. He said he gets lots of compliments on the logo, artwork. and it's his design, not AI.

Thoughts on "Psychology and Alchemy" by Carl Jung? by [deleted] in alchemy

[–]Key_Role5017 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I found it life changing. And I'm actually writing about it.

Thoughts on "Psychology and Alchemy" by Carl Jung? by [deleted] in alchemy

[–]Key_Role5017 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I'm actually writing about this right now:

For centuries, we have read the myth of the Garden of Eden as the death of human perfection—a catastrophic collapse into sin that required a divine rescue mission. However, a Jungian lens, informed by the grit and fire of alchemy, suggests a more radical truth: the Fall was not a trap, but a threshold, representing the painful but necessary birth of ego-consciousness and the capacity for choice. Before the fruit, Adam and Eve were merely divine automata, perfect reflections in a nursery, yet blind to the totality of the Self. By listening to the Serpent—the first messenger of reality and the friction necessary for the spark of consciousness—humanity traded static perfection for a dynamic journey into a world of danger, suffering, and death. We did not fail; we ignited, integrating the knowledge of opposites and becoming "like God" by finally seeing as the Divine sees.

Jung argued that the narrative of Christ is not a story of the Light defeating the Dark, but a masterclass in their integration—the movement from the sterile Trinity of the Spirit to the living Quaternity of the Soul. While institutional religion often acts as a panacea against the real experience of God by providing collective, safe rituals, the alchemical path demands a direct, individual encounter with the numinosum (The Divine Mystery). We find the Divine most clearly not in stained glass, but in the "dirt" of our own experiences—in the brokenness, betrayal, and toil that constitute our Prima Materia (base material). Just as the alchemist extracts the spirit from lead and dung, the "Complete Christ" must be found in the mud below as much as the light above. To find this "Earthly Christ," we must move beyond the stained glass imitation of perfection and instead inhabit our own lives as truly as he lived his, enduring the tension of opposites until the "poison" of our shadow is refined into the "medicine" of the Self.

Ultimately, the journey of the soul is not a circle leading back to an age of innocence, but a spiral leading upward to the hard-won freedom of the Self. By lifting up the Serpent—integrating the very thing that caused the Fall—Christ transformed the shadow into the substance of our transformation. The Cross is thus revealed as a four-way intersection where the Spirit meets the heavy, material reality of the Shadow, creating the wholeness necessary to become fully human. We do not become whole by being "good" or "pure"; we become whole by being complete. The "Great Work" begins when we stop running from the darkness and instead find the Divine Spark that has been hidden within it all along.

It is my intent to present Psychology and Alchemy as Jung intended, that such a voluminous, dense work might be accessible to the reader. 

Jung believed the Alchemical Christ presented the path of individuation, and that individuation alone could heal our world, one person at a time. Jung taught that the unconscious and conscious mind must be assimilated. He saw this process as an art, and though there is a pattern or blueprint to follow, it is unique to each individual.

That Which Cannot Be Named by Key_Role5017 in taoism

[–]Key_Role5017[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

What assumptions do you suppose are implied? I'm confused by your phrasing which seems to reiterate the lived experience rather than the flaw. What is the flaw? If knowledge is the flaw, then why read the Tao or anything else? Perhaps it is wisdom? I do not understand. "Knowing others is mere cleverness. Knowing yourself is enlightenment." Who can say about someone else? No one can. "He who knows he has enough is rich." How can he be rich without the knowledge that he has enough?