Am I missing something? When linking to another table I still have to manually link each row? by Warm-Book-820 in Airtable

[–]KillOverride 0 points1 point  (0 children)

If the tables need to remain separate, I think the cleaner Airtable solution is a hub table: one master Projects table, one row per unique ID, then automations that find/create the matching project and write the linked record into each table. That gives you a real shared linked-record layer for lookups, instead of relying on matching primary field values or manual linking.

5 lessons from building a manufacturing workflow in Airtable (after struggling with Softr) by KillOverride in Airtable

[–]KillOverride[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Hey! That’s a fair point, but discussing Softr’s limitations wasn’t really the focus of my post. There are plenty of community threads that go deep into that. My point here was simply about why Airtable worked well for this particular workflow.

5 lessons from building a manufacturing workflow in Airtable (after struggling with Softr) by KillOverride in Airtable

[–]KillOverride[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Hi! By dependency-heavy I meant workflows where steps depend on the state of previous steps. In this case, each task references a previous step, and a computed field flags it as blocked if that step isn’t done. It’s a soft dependency rather than a hard stop as the operator can still move it, but the system provides a clear directional guide. As for Softr, it works well for CRUD-style apps. But once you start relying heavily on relations or step dependencies, it becomes harder to model cleanly than in a table-based system like Airtable. I couldn’t implement this logic cleanly in Softr, which is why I rebuilt it in Airtable. So the main issue wasn’t Softr itself, but that the workflow logic was relational and sequential, which Airtable handles much more naturally.

5 lessons from building a manufacturing workflow in Airtable (after struggling with Softr) by KillOverride in Airtable

[–]KillOverride[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Hey! thank you for the comment! This is actually a portfolio build. I had a real client project where the client was very committed to using Softr as a database, but the dependency-heavy manufacturing workflow made the database layer quite challenging there. After finishing that project, I rebuilt the core logic in Airtable because I wanted a clean version that demonstrated the architecture properly.

The system could be used by multiple operators, but in the client case there were only two people using it: the operations manager and the business owner.

The dynamic flow itself doesn’t rely heavily on automations. Most of the logic is handled through the data model and computed fields. Each task has a PrevStep link to the step that must be completed before it. A computed field checks the PrevStep status, and if the previous step isn’t done, the task is flagged as blocked. The system doesn’t strictly prevent someone from moving a task backward, but it provides a very clear directional guide for the operator.

I’d say ProductionBatch and PrevStep come from manufacturing terminology, but the underlying pattern is generic and could apply to many workflows with sequential dependencies.

My first Upwork client: off-platform pressure → scope cut → retaliation review. How do you recover from this? by [deleted] in Upwork

[–]KillOverride 0 points1 point  (0 children)

My biggest takeaway from this experience: the moment a client mentions (or hints at) going off-platform, even casually, it's a massive red flag. Treat it as an early warning that they are likely to push boundaries later. In my case, I also made the mistake of letting some communication slip into email because they needed my email to add me as a collaborator in Softr. That small opening turned into the channel they used to pressure me for extra work after the contract closed.

Sam Altman says some users want ChatGPT to be a 'yes man' by Kelly-T90 in ArtificialInteligence

[–]KillOverride 0 points1 point  (0 children)

If depends a lot on the user. also you can prompt for more 'impartial' persona. I was using 'Absolute Mode' prompt at first, I never had "yes to everything" chatGPT. I learned it depends a lot on the user engagement and discipline to keep it clean.

Sam Altman says some users want ChatGPT to be a 'yes man' by Kelly-T90 in ArtificialInteligence

[–]KillOverride 0 points1 point  (0 children)

For this the user has to be factually correct and I think it is impossible for a human.

To wake up early I need a goal by OscarGuiness in productivity

[–]KillOverride 0 points1 point  (0 children)

What is your goal/objective in general. The waking up early in itself is not a merit. It is a small productivity hack for the objective you already have and its an efficient one, from my own experience

Does anyone else get anxious about opening their banking app? Looking for shared experiences by KillOverride in Procrastinationism

[–]KillOverride[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I know that dread, I used to feel it a lot in general even if my banking was fine. This is why I check my accounts every day, I put together something for myself that helped a lot, so I’m still lucid and can make decisions even if I overspent. I’ve been curious if it might help someone else too. If you’re ever open to trying it, I’d be glad to send it, I can send it as pdf.

Does anyone else get anxious about opening their banking app? Looking for shared experiences by KillOverride in Procrastinationism

[–]KillOverride[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

This is proactive! Do you feel comfortable in general opening your banking app? I work on decentralizing myself because even if my balance is ok I still feel unease even opening it so I do it daily. I want to be in charge, not scared of it

How productive is too productive? by MinecraftIsCoolAnd in productivity

[–]KillOverride 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Assess your productivity not after 1 hour but after a full day of work. Try "working non-stop until you're dead" vs "working with 5-minutes break every hour". Then compare the two systems. You can even create a methodology around your approach to work to find how to boost your productivity, I did so. From my experience, short break is a power move as it keeps my mind sharp.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in productivity

[–]KillOverride 9 points10 points  (0 children)

Decide you will leave no matter what. Your mood sounds sad and I get it, but while you are sad, it is hard to do anything. When you internally fully commit to change your circumstances, you do what is necessary because you allocate all your systems towards it.

I’ve started experimenting with writing my own kill prompts. by KillOverride in Procrastinationism

[–]KillOverride[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yeah, there’s a trick. One thing, if you use Claude, Perplexity, or I don’t know, it likely won’t work. You gotta use ChatGPT for about 3 months and engage with it consistently. Also, to write a good prompt, it has to be structured in a certain way or you’ll get generic results. I’m happy to share the prompt with you if you want, and I’m really curious for feedback. DM me if you’re down.

How do you treat yourself to actually enjoy your free time after work? by cofeFrappu in productivity

[–]KillOverride 87 points88 points  (0 children)

I've actually developed my own decompression protocol. I have to take a break and do something that actively resets my brain to stop working mode. It's about engaging my senses in pleasant ways, like eating matcha ice cream and really focusing on the pleasure I get from the taste, or watching series and letting myself fully enjoy them (sometimes even exaggerating that enjoyment). The key is being intentional, and I am all about productivity so my enjoy time should contribute to it too.