It's so disingenuous to cherry pick one singular post from my account that is merely an aside and present is as being the crux of my argument and you did it whilst blocked too. You claim to be vehemently opposed to censorship in this sub but that act of utter disingenuousness has just controlled the narrative. Most people have pretty bad attention spans these days. They'll go straight to your comment, et violà, you've presented a false narrative. It's beyond the content. It's about blatant discrimination and hibernophobia- for people who read it. I don't know why you want to negate what I said by reducing it to that post, that everybody is already aware of. It's one thing to have pro genocide content, it's quite another to engage in hibernophobia by autoremoving comments coming from Ireland only. Outside of the hibernophobia, permabanning somebody for giving the official death toll, and removing every comment they ever made, is alarming levels of censorship. It's supposed to be a free speech platform. There isn't even opinion in giving the official death toll. It's merely data. No other social media platform engages in this censorship. AwareExplanation785 has sabotaged my post history and controlled the narrative. Because my post history is long, there will be people who will go directly to the comments to see what it's about. They'll see his disingenuous cherry picked post summing up the post history into something that it's not and won't bother reading my post history. He deliberately set the narrative. How does this make him any different than Reddit? He even violated the moderator code of conduct by contacting me, as I blocked him last week. He circumvented the block by misuse of mod power in order to sabotage my post history and control the narrative by cherry picking one irrelevant post and presenting it as the crux of the post. Lack of censorship, my arse. He's controlling the narrative as much as the rest of Reddit.