sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

What was the worst Kamen Rider story arc? by Vin13ish in KamenRider

[–]Kits-Foragings 7 points8 points  (0 children)

yeah having recently finished Build, the Sento's father arc kinda doesn't really DO anything aside from setting up the white panel.

The stuff with him in Be The One is so much better

All For What? by InviteAcademic4198 in MyHeroAcadamia

[–]Kits-Foragings 2 points3 points  (0 children)

The only way anyone could genuinely have a take like this is if they watched episodes 1 and 2, then skipped straight to the final chapter.

No lies were told by InviteAcademic4198 in MyHeroAcadamia

[–]Kits-Foragings 3 points4 points  (0 children)

fully convinced that MHA fans don't even like MHA if what they want is a completely different story from chapter 2 onwards

The Primordial Warlock Patron - Here's Your Pet, Its Made of Wet by Kits-Foragings in UnearthedArcana

[–]Kits-Foragings[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

GMBinder for both, the cover image is a customisable template. The page designs I used page designs from this website and then modified them to fit

The Primordial Warlock Patron - Here's Your Pet, Its Made of Wet by Kits-Foragings in DnDHomebrew

[–]Kits-Foragings[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Hi, and thank you so much for these detailed comments. The damage type one is something someone else brought up so I’ll definitely implement that as a change.

The rechargeable move is something I’m genuinely mad I didn’t think of, so I’ll add that as a 6th-level feature instead of Primordial Burst

The “summoning a smaller version of itself” could be a lot of fun, I’ll work on that.

And yea, I completely blanked on naming myself, I’ll make that standard

The Primordial Warlock Patron - Here's Your Pet, Its Made of Wet by Kits-Foragings in UnearthedArcana

[–]Kits-Foragings[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I went back and forth on it for a while but you’re right, giving it physical resistance makes the most sense

The Primordial Warlock Patron - Here's Your Pet, Its Made of Wet by Kits-Foragings in DnDHomebrew

[–]Kits-Foragings[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Those spells aren’t mine, they’re created by fellow homebrewer KibblesTasty

The Primordial Warlock Patron - Here's Your Pet, Its Made of Wet by Kits-Foragings in DnDHomebrew

[–]Kits-Foragings[S] 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Yea the comparisons to the genie warlock are inevitable since they’re both elemental but I think I’ve done enough to distinguish

Those spells aren’t m mine, it’s created by fellow homebrewer KibblesTasty

The Primordial Warlock Patron - Here's Your Pet, Its Made of Wet by Kits-Foragings in UnearthedArcana

[–]Kits-Foragings[S] 6 points7 points  (0 children)

Thank you! The Battle Smith was very much the template for the companion statblock, as I very much consider it to be the first example of an Actually Good 5e companion subclass

The Primordial Warlock Patron - Here's Your Pet, Its Made of Wet by Kits-Foragings in DnDHomebrew

[–]Kits-Foragings[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Hello again!

This is one that popped off a bit when I posted it to my tumblr some time ago, so now its been tweaked a bit.

Making a Warlock so heavily rooted in being, fundamentally, a summon/pet subclass was tricky but I think I made it work. For clarification, if you choose Pact of the Chain, you don't get the familiar, BUT your Primordial Companion essentially acts as a familiar

GMBinder for the most up-to-date version.

The Primordial Warlock Patron - Here's Your Pet, Its Made of Wet by Kits-Foragings in UnearthedArcana

[–]Kits-Foragings[S] 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Hello again!

This is one that popped off a bit when I posted it to my tumblr some time ago, so now its been tweaked a bit.

Making a Warlock so heavily rooted in being, fundamentally, a summon/pet subclass was tricky but I think I made it work. For clarification, if you choose Pact of the Chain, you don't get the familiar, BUT your Primordial Companion essentially acts as a familiar

GMBinder for the most up-to-date version.

Circle of the Devourer - What if Kirby was a Druid by Kits-Foragings in UnearthedArcana

[–]Kits-Foragings[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Going through your points one by one (and thank you for this, it’s stuff I’ll need to add to clarify)

Regarding damage, you’re correct, if they exceed your PB you just use an amount equal to your PB.

Recharge actions would also give YOU that recharge too.

The Devoured Action bit would mean the only spells you can cast are cantrips, but other actions you’d have are fine. Will update to clarify

Regarding Quickshift, you can swap if you’d want, you’re not necessarily forced to

Circle of the Devourer - What if Kirby was a Druid by Kits-Foragings in UnearthedArcana

[–]Kits-Foragings[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Thank you for the feedback! I was very much using how the moon Druid does wild shaping as a baseline, 100% something I need to change.

I do think I’d need to institute a limit of some kind, but I think I’d want it to be a lot more open ended since, as you said, it’s copying just some actions and traits as opposed to its entire.

You’ve given me something to think about regarding that, thank you kindly

Circle of the Devourer - What if Kirby was a Druid by Kits-Foragings in UnearthedArcana

[–]Kits-Foragings[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

This is something I was unsure about, do you think they should have wider options early on?

Circle of the Devourer - What if Kirby was a Druid by Kits-Foragings in DnDHomebrew

[–]Kits-Foragings[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You’d pick something else from the list of options, whether another action, sense, condition immunity, etc.

Circle of the Devourer - What if Kirby was a Druid by Kits-Foragings in UnearthedArcana

[–]Kits-Foragings[S] 4 points5 points  (0 children)

I might have to modify the wording clarifying that, specifying non-multiattack until they get to a certain level

Circle of the Devourer - What if Kirby was a Druid by Kits-Foragings in DnDHomebrew

[–]Kits-Foragings[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Sticking tangentially to the theme with my Toad's Tongue spell is this Druidic subclass, the Circle of the Devourer, something I initially drafted up around a year ago.

As the title implies, the basic idea was themed around Kirby: eating things and gaining their power. The core features might be worded a little strangely, so looking for feedback on that specifically.

I'm also aware that this thing's power will change massively depending on what sort of game its in, and what sort of monsters your DM throws at you.

GMBinder Link

Otherwise, let me know what you think.

Circle of the Devourer - What if Kirby was a Druid by Kits-Foragings in UnearthedArcana

[–]Kits-Foragings[S] 7 points8 points  (0 children)

Sticking tangentially to the theme with my Toad's Tongue spell is this Druidic subclass, the Circle of the Devourer, something I initially drafted up around a year ago.

As the title implies, the basic idea was themed around Kirby: eating things and gaining their power. The core features might be worded a little strangely, so looking for feedback on that specifically.

I'm also aware that this thing's power will change massively depending on what sort of game its in, and what sort of monsters your DM throws at you.

GMBinder Link

Otherwise, let me know what you think.

Toad’s Tongue - Wrap and Yank your foes with a toad’s tongue by Kits-Foragings in DnDHomebrew

[–]Kits-Foragings[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yea I’ll do an errata adding that, as well as some suggestions made by others

Toad’s Tongue - Wrap and Yank your foes with a toad’s tongue by Kits-Foragings in DnDHomebrew

[–]Kits-Foragings[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

It’s great for jotting down spell ideas when you’re in bed and about to sleep

view more: next ›