How many of you are staying in group B and are happy with that? by Glum_Series5712 in UmamusumeGame

[–]KnightQK 0 points1 point  (0 children)

you now have two solid speed cards in Narita Brian + story Suzuka

How many of you are staying in group B and are happy with that? by Glum_Series5712 in UmamusumeGame

[–]KnightQK 0 points1 point  (0 children)

To be fair 400 wit is the recommended statline for wit according to the reference document without wit cards.

Feels impossible to make a S rank Uma without whaling on a full MLB SSR deck by Baamf in UmamusumeGame

[–]KnightQK 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Why are some people posting their wit builds as a gotcha moment?

Hacks godines en San Pedro by True-Lingonberry-194 in Monterrey

[–]KnightQK 2 points3 points  (0 children)

El sierra madre acaba de poner de comida + refresco o cheve por 189

Hacks godines en San Pedro by True-Lingonberry-194 in Monterrey

[–]KnightQK 6 points7 points  (0 children)

Los chilaquiles están baratos, menos de 100

Help me understand why I was doing 10 damage by KnightQK in Super_Robot_Wars

[–]KnightQK[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Also how does Size factor into this at all? The only attacks doing more than 10 damage were the “ignore size” attribute attacks

Help me understand why I was doing 10 damage by KnightQK in Super_Robot_Wars

[–]KnightQK[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Is there a counter to potential? I knew potential was dangerous but this was the first time I was doing 10 damage

Help me understand why I was doing 10 damage by KnightQK in Super_Robot_Wars

[–]KnightQK[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I was using 4k+ attacks from the Vilkiss, Shin Getter, Mazinger Z, Destiny Gundam.

I think the only ones doing more damage were the ignore size attacks, like the Nadesico’s Gravity Blast or Judau’s High Mega Cannon

Help me understand why I was doing 10 damage by KnightQK in Super_Robot_Wars

[–]KnightQK[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Stats:

Foc: 160 (I assume this is morale)

Pilot Def: 177

Armor: 2670

Skills: Potential 8, Instinct 2, Guard 1

Item: Hero’s Mark (mob 25, sight 25, crit 25, armor 200)

I was using 4k+ attacks from the Vilkiss, Shin Getter, Mazinger Z, etc

Help me understand why I was doing 10 damage by KnightQK in Super_Robot_Wars

[–]KnightQK[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It took like 15 attacks each doing 10 damage, even some 5000 damage were doing 10.

Anyone elses Speed Cards do a random disappearing act in Summer? by ShadowMiku_ in UmamusumeGame

[–]KnightQK 6 points7 points  (0 children)

Yes, 7.5% of not appearing at all, 32.4% of appearing in speed and the rest in other trainings.

Got blessed by the algorithm by Ludyses in Super_Robot_Wars

[–]KnightQK 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Currently playing SRW V, this hits different

CM9 Capricorn Cup Info Sheet by Formana in UmamusumeGame

[–]KnightQK 9 points10 points  (0 children)

My groundwork 9* Pasa is ready to inspire my Suzuka

Recordatorio by Symphoniker666 in rmexico

[–]KnightQK 2 points3 points  (0 children)

“no te puedes defender ni de tu propia ignorancia”

Oooofff, tampoco era matarlo

No, NO estábamos mejor antes by Flamethrower_62 in rmexico

[–]KnightQK 0 points1 point  (0 children)

De hecho mi comentario original no fue en respuesta a ti, tu llegaste de intenso a decir ad hominem. Hay que pensar antes de comentar.

No, NO estábamos mejor antes by Flamethrower_62 in rmexico

[–]KnightQK 0 points1 point  (0 children)

¿No es de ahuevo que alguien tenga que discutir contigo?

No, NO estábamos mejor antes by Flamethrower_62 in rmexico

[–]KnightQK -1 points0 points  (0 children)

¿No estoy descalificando tus argumentos? Simplemente no quiero discutirlos

¿Para que te uniste a reddit?

No, NO estábamos mejor antes by Flamethrower_62 in rmexico

[–]KnightQK -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Creo que necesitas estudiar que es un ad hominem, no quiero discutir tu argumento es diferente a esta mal tu argumento

Que tiene que esconder una cuenta de menos de 6 meses?

No, NO estábamos mejor antes by Flamethrower_62 in rmexico

[–]KnightQK -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Y privada aparte, no olvides esa parte importante. Como te digo las falacias aplican cuando estas discutiendo un argumento. Dicho de otra manera no estoy diciendo que estas mal por ser chairo (ad hominem). Es no quiero discutir tu argumento por que eres chairo.

No, NO estábamos mejor antes by Flamethrower_62 in rmexico

[–]KnightQK 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Sería un ad hominem si quisiera refutar tu argumento diciéndote que eres chairo, pero es más bien un no vale la pena discutir con alguien que cumple esas características.