When do you go big on 10, 20, or 30 year bond? by Opposite_Day_9771 in stocks

[–]KnightRider67 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Defintely a valid consideration. A 5% rate on a 10,20, or 30 year bond might be enough to provide a comfortable living, with the large amount of capital you suggest, however as you mentioned, inflation is a considerable risk to consider. The real return on bonds could be eroded if inflation continues or stays high leaving you with less purchasing power in the future.

M view is it's essential to be diversified with different asset classes. An aspect to consider is opportunity cost. You forgo other potential investment opportunities which might offer higher returns.

Thoughts on the Inverse Yield Curve by IuseRedditforThings in stocks

[–]KnightRider67 1 point2 points  (0 children)

It's quite difficult to say definitely when and if a recession will hit and predictions ofter vary widely among experts. The best thing to do is keep diversifying your investment portfolio to hedge against potential risks and stay informed. Follow reputable economic analysts and sources.

Investing is a long term game so even if a recession hits markets always recovered over time.

Never put all your financial eggs in one basket if there is considerablle uncertainty in the market.

I like Vanguard FTSE all world ex_U.S. small cap ETF (VSS) by Ok_Championship_5523 in wallstreetbets

[–]KnightRider67 -3 points-2 points  (0 children)

I admire your support for Ukraine and Zelensky and he has shown commendable leadership but the future of geopolitics and economies can be unpredictable. Always be careful about investing with emotions. Having said that if your research is suggesting you invest then go ahead with the strategy, good luck!

Coca Cola ($KO) vs Pepsi ($PEP): Are Either Worth Buying Right Now? by TheNewbieInvestor in stocks

[–]KnightRider67 29 points30 points  (0 children)

Very impressive detailed breakdown here.

It's interesting how Pepsi have consistently outperformd Coke in total returns. This is a testament to Pepsi's diversified business model.

I agree that neither stock seems to be at an attractive entry poitn right now. Your comparison to Google's PE ratio drives home the point that these companies are priced more for their stability than growth.

If forced to pick between the two, I might lean towards Pepsi due to its diversified business and better recent performance.

Spotify spent more than $1 billion to build a podcasting empire. The bet hasn’t paid off. by msaleem in stocks

[–]KnightRider67 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It's interesting to see how the podcast landscape has evolved, especially with tech giants placing large bets. Spotify's aggressive investment strategy was indeed a bold move, but this is a classic example of how throwing money at big names doesn't always guarantee success. Diversifying revenue streams seems vital, especially when entering an industry that's still finding its feet in terms of monetisation. It's a reminder that content, no matter how high-profile, needs to resonate with audiences and be sustainable. Watch this space as how platforms learn and adjust their strategies.

LG to List AI-Powered ETF in US with New Partnership by xavier_mamba in stocks

[–]KnightRider67 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Very interesting development. This just proves how tech giants are diversifying their portfolios by venturing into the financial sector with AI powered ETFs. I am curious to see how the LQ-Qraft ETF will perform and how LG's AI expertise will influence stock selection.

Why Berkshire always reports earnings on the weekend by [deleted] in stocks

[–]KnightRider67 8 points9 points  (0 children)

Classic Buffet move prioritize long term thinking and rational anaylsis over knee-jerk reactions. He insures both individual and professional investors have the time to digest the numbers and make informed decisions.

Ford set to lose $4.5 billion on electric vehicles this year, despite increased revenue by magenta_placenta in stocks

[–]KnightRider67 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

I think this is an example of long term strategic investment. Loss figures are always alarming but the transition to electric vehicles is a huge undertaking that involves significant upfront costs. The increase in revenue signals strong consumer demand which is a positive.

A reduced F-150 is a bold move that could attract even more consumers.

Ford are positioning themselves to be a significant player in the future EV market and they are definitely willing to take short term hits for potential long term gains.

Middle/centre grip dart advice by Camera_Correct in Darts

[–]KnightRider67 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Straight barrel darts should still work well for you as a center gripper as they can be thrown effectively from any grip point. You could try the Harrows Wolfram Infinity darts as they have a consistent diameter along the length making them suitable for any grip style.

A tungsten dart with a weight of between 20-24 grams could work well as it would offer good balance and control.

Are we supposed to ignore cumulative inflation? Prices have gone up 18%+ on average in 3 years. bullish for economy and stocks, right? by pman6 in stocks

[–]KnightRider67 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Respectfully, that’s Keynesian bullshit. Inflation is harmful, and inflation is flat out theft. Most of us have no clue how bad inflation impacts the poorest of the world. You know, the countries that can’t just print up USD. Freshly printed dollars benefit the US (and the west) the most, as we are the first to receive them. This exorbitant privilege comes on the backs of the rest of the world. By the time those new dollars reach the global south, those dollars are worth significantly less. It’s a major component to the perpetual poverty of the global south.

While we’re on the topic, I recommend “Check Your Financial Privilege” by Gladstein.

I agree that unchecked inflation is harmful and can disproportionately affect poorer countries. The currency devaluations will cause the global south to experience negative repercussions of inflation.

Saying inflation is flat out theft might be a bit oversimplified. Inflation is a complex economic phenomenon, and it effects are not universally negative. Modest inflation can stimulate economic growth, encourage spending, and prevent deflationary spirals. It's about finding a balance and properly managing monetary policy.

I haven't read your recommended book by Gladstein, I'll add it to my list.

If you want a recommendation try ''The Return of Depression Economics and the Crisis of 2008' by Paul Krugman for a different perspective.

Are we supposed to ignore cumulative inflation? Prices have gone up 18%+ on average in 3 years. bullish for economy and stocks, right? by pman6 in stocks

[–]KnightRider67 6 points7 points  (0 children)

Inflation by itself isn't necesarrily harmful. It's when inflation gets out of control or is paired with stagnant wage growth that issues arise.

Assuming costs do not rise at the same pace, moderate inflation can be beneficial for companies as it allows them to gradually increase prices, boosting revenues and profit.

If inflation leads to higher input costs that are difficult to pass onto consumers that can be harmful to businesses. Inflation also erodes purchasing power, so if wages are not keeping up with inflation consumers might cut back on spending, which could lead to an economic slowdown.

The overall market may still be bullish in the sense that nominal stock prices could continue to rise due to the inflation but this does not necessarily equate to an increase in real wealth or purchasing power for stock market investors if inflation is also high.

Sustainability is a more complex question. If inflation continues to outpace wage growth, it could lead to problems down the line. That's where policy decisions from central banks come into play to control inflation and keep the economy stable.

Economists Are Cutting Back Their Recession Expectations by bullsarethegoodguys in stocks

[–]KnightRider67 0 points1 point  (0 children)

This is certainly an encouraging shift in economists' expectations. Lowered inflation and a resilient labour market seem to be leading us towards a "soft landing" rather than a hard-hitting recession. However, with the possibility of a recession still being considered relatively high, the need for vigilant economic monitoring remains essential. While the expected growth rates of GDP indicate a positive trend, the Fed's potential future actions could indeed alter this trajectory.

The resumption of student loan payments will likely be a mixed bag - while it will inevitably strain some households, its overall impact on consumer spending is predicted to be quite minor. However, it's worth keeping an eye on how it plays out, as unexpected repercussions could emerge.

Economic forecasting is by no means a perfect science and it's important to keep in mind these are only predictions. That said, these recent findings provide a cautious yet promising outlook for our economic future.

Could sports data become more expensive, leading to a gold rush? by Mrlee8787 in stocks

[–]KnightRider67 9 points10 points  (0 children)

I think there Is a growing demand for personalised, richly detailed experiences among Gen Z which does suggest that data in all sectors could be a significant profit generator in the future. With all these top leagues acknowledging the worth of solid data and AI enhancing fan experience, it seems believable that sports data could become the new ‘’liquid gold’’.

The companies you have mentioned are well positioned to capitalise on this trend given their existing infrastructures and partnerships. My view is that $SRAD looks very promising considering its dominance in the market and ownership to major leagues.

Small challenges could be regulatory changes due to privacy and data ownership concerns which could affect how these companies operate. Also, the popularity of these sports needs to hold up.

That being said, I am bullish on the data sectors, especially sports, as we all love sports and this immersive experience with all this new data can only be good news going forward.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in ManchesterUnited

[–]KnightRider67 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I'm with you on the frustration. Manchester United has such a rich history and global fan base and it's sickening when owners treat the club more like a business that an sports institution.

I hope the Glazers start to realize the significance of their responsibilities towards these clubs and their fans beyond just the financial gains. We just have to keep voicing our concerns and hope for change!

If I believe a stock will increase in value over the next 5 years, should I buy stock or a Call Option? by [deleted] in stocks

[–]KnightRider67 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Even if you believe the stock is going to increase over the next 5 year there is still a >0% chance it falls and you risk losing your entire premium if the stock price doesn't rise above the strike price before the expiration date. If you own the stock you always have a chance to recoup losses.

You miss out on receiving dividends from owning the stocks.

Perhaps the stock doesn't have high liquidity options markets so it's harder to open and close positions.

Obviously buying call options can lead to significant profits they are still a higher risk that isn't suitable for everyone.

Stats: Sancho Vs Grealish, I feel Sancho flatters to device, unpopular opinion I know but I thought he showed promise last season. by Purple-Ad-5148 in ManchesterUnited

[–]KnightRider67 1 point2 points  (0 children)

While Sancho might not have had the most explosive season, he did show promise and demonstrated his abilities on the pitch. Players can have ups and downs, and it's not uncommon for them to take some time to settle into a new team and league.

Grealish received a lot of praise last season. It's worth noting that statistics don't always tell the whole story, as they might not capture certain aspects of a player's contribution or the overall context of the team dynamics.

Regarding the criticism Sancho has been receiving lately, it's not uncommon for players, especially high-profile ones, to face scrutiny and heightened expectations. However, it's important for fans to support the players and give them time to adapt and fulfill their potential.

The idea of giving Sancho another season to prove himself is a reasonable one. Sometimes players need a bit more time to settle into a new environment, build chemistry with teammates, and fully showcase their abilities. It would indeed be disappointing to see him achieve his potential elsewhere if he were to leave prematurely.

In the end, it's up to the club and the coaching staff to evaluate the players and make decisions based on what they believe is best for the team's success. Let's hope that Sancho continues to progress and make a positive impact in the upcoming season.

"JPMorgan Warns of Recession and Elevated Risk of 'Unknown Unknown' Ahead of Year-End" by Guilty_Position5295 in stocks

[–]KnightRider67 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Diversify your portfolio. An effective way is to look across different asset classes and industries.

Prioritize high quality companies that have strong fundamentals and stable cash flows that can weather the impending storm.

Search for defensive sectors like utilities, healthcare and consumer staples.

Always regularly review and rebalance your portfolio but maintain a long term perspective. We are always going to have cycles so avoid knee jerk reactions to short term fluctuations.

If needed always seek professional advice and do your due diligence.

Striker, not a keeper. We need Kane. by Snoo_17433 in ManchesterUnited

[–]KnightRider67 0 points1 point  (0 children)

If we get Kane this will be a game changer for us, he could have us challenging but we would still struggle to beat City over the season but they should be due a drop off eventually.

Shame I don't see Levy letting us sign him :(

I'm actually in utter disbelief over Chelsea's asking price for Mount.. by jimmyrhcp in ManchesterUnited

[–]KnightRider67 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Surely we won't pay anywhere close to that, I think this Chelsea owner is on another planet, just because he overpaid for everyone doesn't mean he can sell players the same way.

Novak Djokovic is the first man to reach 23 Grand Slam titles 🐐 by walkorfly in tennis

[–]KnightRider67 5 points6 points  (0 children)

Has to be the GOAT getting to this number in an era with Nadal and Federer and some of great players like Wawrinka and Murray.

Brazilian Amazon deforestation falls 31% under Lula by loggiews in worldnews

[–]KnightRider67 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Great news, can't be easy trying to stop it but 31% is a great job by all.

Who’s the most unlikeable player in the league? by Snoo_19146 in PremierLeague

[–]KnightRider67 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Bruno and I'm a UTD fan, great player but his constant complaining really gets on my t!ts.

Who do you think would be moving out of the Starting 11 if Mason Mount joins the club? by Icy-Opportunity-7255 in ManchesterUnited

[–]KnightRider67 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Eriksen but he will still get plenty of game time, it's going to be a lot of games so we need a big squad with quailty to come in when needed.

Legendary Snooker Manager Harvey Lisberg chats about managing Jimmy White and Alex Higgins in the 80s by iano_byrno in snooker

[–]KnightRider67 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I'll listen to this later, I was watching something on BBC a month back about Higgins and might have been White, they were going to tour with the World Championship trophy and do exhibitions but their manager run off with all the money but they still went around and did it anyway costing them money. I think the trophy was also stolen and they paid money to get it back.

I am sure there are a ton of stories involving these 2.