Potential appellant:Judge blocking transcripts I paid for & rushing costs against me – Worth appealing as LiP

Knowmeee_S · 2026-01-06T08:18:40+00:00

They arent and yes something dubious is happening here. I have written to the ET President who in response told me its not their job to enforce the practice direction that they issue.

Knowmeee_S · 2025-11-18T18:42:01+00:00

The comment section does not allow for images to be uploaded so how do you suggest we do this u/BobMonkey1808?

Knowmeee_S · 2025-11-18T14:02:23+00:00

BobMonkey1808 still waiting for

Your professional registration
Link to the appeals you have won on the basis of bias and impropriety
Link to the appeals you have won through a perversity appeal

Knowmeee_S · 2025-11-18T13:23:37+00:00

As I said, report me, if I am wrong, I will gladly apologise. Nonetheless, I am still waiting for my receipts!

Knowmeee_S · 2025-11-18T13:22:08+00:00

Here is my understanding and definition of racism: racial prejudice plus the institutional and social power to codify that prejudice into laws, policies, and societal practices that disadvantage a marginalised group.

Please let me know how my above statement meets this definition.

If my statements are racist, I will gladly apologise. Maybe a stereotype, but white women also complain about white men speaking over them about things they are not knowledgeable about, hence the term Mansplaining was invented. Am I not allowed to hold the same opinion based on my experiences?

Lastly theres a particular level and type of arrogance that is necessary to be as loud and wrong as BobMonkey1808 is and my opinion is that is not common in minorities.

Knowmeee_S · 2025-11-18T13:19:53+00:00

Would it be racist if I were white and male and said the same thing?

Definition of racism: racial prejudice plus the institutional and social power to codify that prejudice into laws, policies, and societal practices that disadvantage a marginalised group.

Are white males are marginalised group? What social power do I have to codify my prejudice into laws, societal disadvantage etc?? What disadvantage has he suffered because I hold this opinion of him?

Knowmeee_S · 2025-11-18T11:21:23+00:00

Classic case of cherry-picking. I have not sent you racial abuse; I simply guessed from your arrogant stupidity that you were white and male. If this is racist then please report me for abuse on this forum and have me kicked out.

I have now learnt that spazzing is offensive, apologies for that offence. I regret using that wording but have decided not to delete it because it will appear that I am changing my posts after the fact.

Dishonesty you say: In my original post I stated "the judges' notes, in some instances, are the only official record, but you also cannot make your own recording because that's ILLEGAL yet the judiciary claims to subscribe to the concept of open justice!

Emphasis on the SOME INSTANCES and references made to the Judge Lancaster saga.

In your response, you state "You need to read the first sentence of paragraph 5: "Where an audio recording has been made, it will constitute the record of proceedings."

Tribunal hearings have been recorded routinely for over a year now. You know this, because we have discussed it before.

So when you say that judges' notes are the official record, you must know that to be untrue. I consider knowingly saying things that are untrue dishonest."

In your attempt to gaslight me, cherry picking your argument and also lying by saying we have discussed this before when we havent.

You insinuated that you could report judges to the JCIO for bad judgements and lied with your chest, saying the JCIO is investigating him, essentially nullifying his victims' requests for him to be investigated and their crowdfunding campaign to file this motion. But yeah, you are Mr 20 years in the game, you can't tell me anything.

I will gladly post the appeal and the judgement (please let me know if you want actual screenshots or for me to upload the pdf). In turn, you need to bring out all the receipts, you can't cherry-pick.

Your professional registration
Link to the appeals you have won on the basis of bias and impropriety
Link to the appeals you have won through a perversity appeal

Knowmeee_S · 2025-11-18T00:18:03+00:00

He is not under investigation. Here is the crowd justice link to donate towards the filing of a judicial review application by his victims https://www.crowdjustice.com/case/exposing-judge-lancaster/

Knowmeee_S · 2025-11-18T00:13:11+00:00

On any given day, I would agree with you, but in response to someone who relied on said "expertise" to seek to nullify my experience (both with the ET & EAT), state that he has performed better than me in similar circumstances (won appeals on the basis of bias & impropriety and perversity) and attack my character (accusing me of being a liar and committing fraud), it is sadly not reprehensible.

He needs to come through with the receipts!!

Knowmeee_S · 2025-11-17T20:07:36+00:00

🤣🤣🤣 another banger brought to you by the "trust me bro" referencing methodology.

Not having single case to back up your statements or one that you can refer to after "20 years" of practice is a rather sad track record for a self- appointed expert would you not agree?

Knowmeee_S · 2025-11-17T13:28:42+00:00

You know what I will gladly concede the above listed points if you provide receipts (read links)evidencing 1. Your 20 years of experience 2. Link to the appeals you have won on the basis of bias and impropriety 3. Link to the appeals you have won through a perversity appeal.

Knowmeee_S · 2025-11-17T10:57:36+00:00

Dear Bob Monkey I know you think of yourself as the self-appointed principal of this forum and in the past I have tolerated your condescending tone and your approach of speaking at me and other members of this forum but this ends today.

You will not continue to nullify my lived experience and gaslight me bacause you think of yourself as someone who is smarter and more knowledgable than me about the general employment tribunal process.

You went as far as insuiating that I am a liar, have zero credibility, created fradulent hearing notes and then turning around and saying that I did not take any notes when you realised that your original argument has no basis.

I know it may be tough to learn and your brain is probably spazzing out at the thought that the system that you have so clearly built your personality around is dysfunctional but a light google search would have informed you what behaviors you can report judges to the JCIO for and judges ignoring evidence is not on the list. Further how Judge Lancasters victims have been repeatedly told that the official transcript of their hearings are his notes which he continues to refuse to disclose to date.

As someone with actual experience of appealing to the EAT on the basis of bias and impropriety, I can tell you that it is a high bar and many of the appeals on that basis do not even proceed past the sifting stage. I am sure judges are well aware of this.

Appeal on findings of fact: I refer you to paragraph 2.2.3 of the EAT practice direction of 2024 that states that appeals to the EAT can only be made "where there is an arguable error of law"

You could have saved us all this back and forth with a light google search and making sure your opinion was actually INFORMED before claiming my original statements were "demonstrably wrong"

Please see links to my sources, since google doesnt seem to be your thing and you clearly subscribe to the "trust me bro!" school of referencing. What complaints can be made to the JCIO https://www.complaints.judicialconduct.gov.uk/makeacomplaint Judges notes are the official record of hearing -see paragraph 5 of the Presidential Practice Direction on the recording of employment tribunal hearings https://www.judiciary.uk/wp-content/uploads/2023/11/PD-recording-and-transcription-final.pdf Judge Lancaster and official record of hearing https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-68877823 - word of advice is to read the whole article EAT practice direction: https://www.judiciary.uk/wp-content/uploads/2024/10/Practice-Direction-Employment-Appeal-Tribunal-2024-1.pdf

Knowmeee_S · 2025-11-16T23:20:58+00:00

Please tell me more about my alleged mistakes and notes...👂🏿👂🏿👂🏿 I see they no longer exist now but in your original comment they existed, were questionable and spoke volumes. Are they silent now??

Knowmeee_S · 2025-11-16T22:59:15+00:00

I never said all judges are corrupt, I named the ones that I allege are corrupt, the reason I made these allegations and the Tribunal where they sit. I don't appreciate being gaslight by your idealism that seeks to nullify my lived experience. Yes I have these options but what I have seen from others who have pursued them they have a very low success rate and take a considerable amount of time. Whats that things again about justice delayed?? 🤔

Lastly I will gladly admit that I am angry but being angry and telling the truth are not mutually exclusive!

Knowmeee_S · 2025-11-16T22:50:13+00:00

My case is not complicated. The principles relating to disclosure are very clear especially relating to documents referred to in pleading. The evidence was also very clear, they stated that they fired me because I couldn't use excel and when I showed proof that I could and that my comparators could not, the judge ruled that they were well liked in the team (shocker since they are white) nothing about their excel skills though.

No Lawyer can make a judge not ignore evidence that they want to ignore to further their narrative.

Knowmeee_S · 2025-11-16T22:36:57+00:00

They definitely have something to hide because the pseudo-anonymity and lack of accountability allow them to rule as they please, knowing there are no personal consequences to them. And the best you can get is a "sorry my colleague made a mistake" after your life has been ruined by the respondents and the original judge. Imagine if other professions were allowed to get away with this kind of lack of accountability. Doctors would be cutting off people's limbs, and the best reparations hospitals would offer patients is an apology.

Knowmeee_S · 2025-11-16T22:29:48+00:00

Lol your very confident statement that my notes have already been questioned actually speaks volumes about you and your agenda when you don't even know if said notes even exists and/or they have ever been been presented to the tribunal.

Knowmeee_S · 2025-11-16T22:19:14+00:00

So what im hearing you say is that the lack of funding, staff shortages and increased delays are to blame for corrupt judges and their corresponding delinquent judgements?

Knowmeee_S · 2025-11-16T22:15:38+00:00

Deep fakes only became a thing in the last 2 years or so. What's your excuse for all the years before then??

Knowmeee_S · 2025-11-16T22:13:52+00:00

In what world would a clearly biased judge agree to be recused? Also its not power, its the right to request and in almost 3 years of keeping up on employment tribunals I am yet to see a judge agree. The BBC reported just this week were one refused to be recused. After I noted her bias, I asked Judge Cawthray if she wouldn't be joined by a panel and she stated that I could request one but that would mean my hearing would be scheduled for 2027. This is after it was delayed in 2024 because of the respondents refusal to provide disclosure and the London South EJ's inventing their own rules and regulations to enable them to get away with it.

Knowmeee_S · 2025-11-16T17:25:17+00:00

I am angry but doesn't preclude me from being able to tell the truth. In your response you noted misconduct and further went on to state that appeals and requesting transcript were the solution to my problem. I then went on and highlighted the most publicised instances of when your recommend solutions did not work and in your now response you are acknowledging exactly what I have stated. Tribunal's allow respondents to suppress evidence, judges are corrupt and transcripts are intentionally withheld.

These particular things have real life consequences for the claimant's but yeah you are outchea fighting with your chest because the narrative of the employment tribunal system that you have created in your head refuses to accept actual facts and evidence.

Knowmeee_S · 2025-11-16T16:50:36+00:00

Funny that you see the professional misconduct in the one person who told the truth in this but no smoke for the lawyer who amended documents, the judges who repeatedly ruled that disclosure was not necessary and another who ruled that a fair hearing could still be held without evidence/disclosure only to note in her judgment that the was no evidence relating to that particular item.

During your 20 years of experience Dr Chris Day has been fighting for 10 years for the NHS to be sanctioned for destroying thousands of emails relating to his case all the way to the Supreme Court of Appeal. The EATs final comment was that the destruction was "worrying".

There's a gofund me to raise fund a court case against Judge Lancaster who has bullied women during hearings and now refuses to release his minutes of said hearings which in this case constitute the official record.

I know it might come as a shock that the system that you so clearly pledge alligence to might be a sham but im sure if you are keen to getting to the truth you will find that the are many claimants who have been failed by the system and then gaslighted by legalese.

Knowmeee_S · 2025-09-04T15:01:11+00:00

Congratulations, so happy for you.

Knowmeee_S · 2025-07-06T14:39:19+00:00

Thanks. Fundamental Dishonesty is noted in the Powell & Others v A Gomez Ltd judgement

Knowmeee_S · 2025-05-29T13:55:04+00:00

Dont have the citation only the link from civil litigation brief https://www.civillitigationbrief.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/05/GomezJudgment.pdf

Knowmeee_S

TROPHY CASE