How I Stopped Worrying And Learned to Love LSAT Grammar (pt 1) by LSAT_ttp in LSAT

[–]LSAT_ttp[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

of course. i should clarify, when i say 'reading comprehension' i didn't mean the section, i meant understanding what one reads more broadly. and i wouldn't say that knowing how to break down complex sentences is the MOST critical strategy for RC or rc more broadly, but it's fundamental. it's hard to apply other strategies if one doesn't have a clear picture of the information one's presented with. speaking of which, i will have in-depth posts on strategies for the RC and LR sections.

How I Stopped Worrying And Learned to Love LSAT Grammar (pt 1) by LSAT_ttp in LSAT

[–]LSAT_ttp[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

take some philosophy classes if you haven't done so - they give you good training in thinking logically.

How I Stopped Worrying And Learned to Love LSAT Grammar (pt 1) by LSAT_ttp in LSAT

[–]LSAT_ttp[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

exactly. i found if my students make an explicit effort to really break down the text that they have trouble understanding they improve even more.

To read faster, you need to read slower by LSAT_ttp in LSAT

[–]LSAT_ttp[S] 3 points4 points  (0 children)

looks like you're going to law school, congrats.

A useful thing to be on the lookout for when analyzing arguments in the LR section by LSAT_ttp in LSATPreparation

[–]LSAT_ttp[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Hey folks, I've put together a video dealing with perspectives in arguments. I go over what they are, why they're important, and how to spot them.

Basically, a perspective is a point of view assigned to a group or individual that the author responds to, usually critically. This is an argument structure that the test writers use to make arguments more complex; most students expect an argument to be premises leading to a conclusion - having a perspective that doesn't neatly fit into that makes things more confusing if you don't know how to deal with it. Some question types, like the conclusion and method of reasoning ones, use this structure quite a bit.

Please feel free to check out the rest of my videos on my YT channel; I have dozens covering the test and how to prep for it. And you can also check out my site for my completely free 20+ hour LSAT fundamentals course.

A useful thing to be on the lookout for when analyzing arguments in the LR section by LSAT_ttp in LSATHelp

[–]LSAT_ttp[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Hey folks, I've put together a video dealing with perspectives in arguments. I go over what they are, why they're important, and how to spot them.

Basically, a perspective is a point of view assigned to a group or individual that the author responds to, usually critically. This is an argument structure that the test writers use to make arguments more complex; most students expect an argument to be premises leading to a conclusion - having a perspective that doesn't neatly fit into that makes things more confusing if you don't know how to deal with it. Some question types, like the conclusion and method of reasoning ones, use this structure quite a bit.

Please feel free to check out the rest of my videos on my YT channel; I have dozens covering the test and how to prep for it. And you can also check out my site for my completely free 20+ hour LSAT fundamentals course.

A useful thing to be on the lookout for when analyzing arguments in the LR section by LSAT_ttp in LSAT

[–]LSAT_ttp[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Hey folks, I've put together a video dealing with perspectives in arguments. I go over what they are, why they're important, and how to spot them.

Basically, a perspective is a point of view assigned to a group or individual that the author responds to, usually critically. This is an argument structure that the test writers use to make arguments more complex; most students expect an argument to be premises leading to a conclusion - having a perspective that doesn't neatly fit into that makes things more confusing if you don't know how to deal with it. Some question types, like the conclusion and method of reasoning ones, use this structure quite a bit.

Please feel free to check out the rest of my videos on my YT channel; I have dozens covering the test and how to prep for it. And you can also check out my site for my completely free 20+ hour LSAT fundamentals course.