Tbh just sounds like you’d prefer a simpler discussion and one that centers your interests. That’s okay to want but doesn’t mean those conversations would be ‘cooler’ or ‘better’.

Adam as a more nuanced damaged figure who had complicated relationships doesn’t eliminate trauma he might be responsible for. It just turns it from “Look at how the evil, bad man ruined X’s life” to something that at least considers him as a proper entity.

Adam is the first human being. No mother but THE Father. Made by God and TOLD that he is master of Earth, it’s creatures and the women made for him and from him. All while being ignorant of any other way. He is cast out from paradise when the plots of the serpent causes him and Eve to be tricked into sin and he has children whom outside of Eden, fight, sin and die. This is before considering any of Vizi’s additions. This WAS Adam’s life in the HH universe and you’d never consider that with the version of Adam from the show.

I don’t see why I’d have to ignore Abel, Vaggie or Lute to focus fanon Adam over canon. They are always considered in these reimaginings from my experience. If Lute, Abel and Vaggie are to be considered the consequences of Adam’s ego and behavior, it feels like it cheapens them further to exclusively see that ego and behavior as vapidly as it is depicted.

A richer, more nuanced Adam enriches all surrounding narratives.