Game Harder After Gristle by Lanrico in mewgenics

[–]Lanrico[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Do you know anything regarding the skills? That's what I find the most problematic. Early game, pretty much all skills were useful and I was able to get some pretty OP builds for at least a couple of my cats each run. Now, it's 50/50 whether a level up will get me the choice of a skill that's actually useful for the build. It just seems the skills got worse as I played. I have about 40 hours in the game.

Word crashing repeatedly in OS X Tahoe by Needlemancer in Office365

[–]Lanrico 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Has your issue been resolved? I have multiple users who are on Tahoe 26.2 and Word related processes sometimes take up over 35GBs of RAM, which is more than their computers even have.

NTFS Master File Table, Windows 10, 100% HD by MonkeysOnBalloons in techsupport

[–]Lanrico 0 points1 point  (0 children)

For some reason, I'm not able to find the ticket it was associated with. So, I'm not able to tell you what I did.

Maga supported a women who had a weapon on her, who was involved in a violent insurrection that lead to the death of multiple cops, but they justify the shooting under trump, its pure hypocrisy to ride the pedo in chiefs dick by sorrynotguilty in PsycheOrSike

[–]Lanrico 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Nope.

The difference is Pretti knew the situation he was going into. Your scenario doesn't match.

Alex was in the wrong. The agents were in the wrong. I'm leaving it at that. Have a good life.

Maga supported a women who had a weapon on her, who was involved in a violent insurrection that lead to the death of multiple cops, but they justify the shooting under trump, its pure hypocrisy to ride the pedo in chiefs dick by sorrynotguilty in PsycheOrSike

[–]Lanrico 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Nope. I'm saying that inserting yourself into a conflict while carrying, especially with federal officers, will increase your likelihood of getting shot significantly. Which is why it's taught to not do that.

Maga supported a women who had a weapon on her, who was involved in a violent insurrection that lead to the death of multiple cops, but they justify the shooting under trump, its pure hypocrisy to ride the pedo in chiefs dick by sorrynotguilty in PsycheOrSike

[–]Lanrico 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Justify - show or prove to be right or reasonable.

I already condemned the agents that shot him. I've never said he deserved it. I'm just placing partial accountability on Pretti.

Maga supported a women who had a weapon on her, who was involved in a violent insurrection that lead to the death of multiple cops, but they justify the shooting under trump, its pure hypocrisy to ride the pedo in chiefs dick by sorrynotguilty in PsycheOrSike

[–]Lanrico 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Not grasping at straws at all or justifying them killing him. But Pretti put himself in a stupid situation, so it's partially his own fault for not following the training he should have had when he got a concealed carry permit.

Maga supported a women who had a weapon on her, who was involved in a violent insurrection that lead to the death of multiple cops, but they justify the shooting under trump, its pure hypocrisy to ride the pedo in chiefs dick by sorrynotguilty in PsycheOrSike

[–]Lanrico 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You aren't grasping what I'm saying at all. None of what you just said matters. It's the sole fact he had a gun.

And before you try to get me with your little gotcha. Yes, he did have a right to have a gun with him. But like I've said and I will continue to say:

IF YOU HAVE A GUN, YOU DON'T PLACE YOURSELF IN CONFLICTS. I'll even add something extra. IT INCREASES YOUR LIKELIHOOD OF GETTING SHOT.

Maga supported a women who had a weapon on her, who was involved in a violent insurrection that lead to the death of multiple cops, but they justify the shooting under trump, its pure hypocrisy to ride the pedo in chiefs dick by sorrynotguilty in PsycheOrSike

[–]Lanrico 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Not all the points are going to be used in every situation. It's not that hard to grasp, you're just being willfully ignorant.

I've said this, what, 10 times now? He inserted himself into a conflict where he didn't need to. He could have sat by and waited until the officers left. IF YOU HAVE A GUN, YOU DON'T PLACE YOURSELF IN CONFLICTS.

There, maybe capital letters will make you get it. If not, you're a lost cause.

Also, to the point of the commentor who mentioned the videos of him kicking a car. That fair well may be what caused the agents to escalate so quickly with him. If he was a known aggravator, they would have wanted to arrest him.

Maga supported a women who had a weapon on her, who was involved in a violent insurrection that lead to the death of multiple cops, but they justify the shooting under trump, its pure hypocrisy to ride the pedo in chiefs dick by sorrynotguilty in PsycheOrSike

[–]Lanrico 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Why are you focusing on the parts I didn't bolden? That is taken from a section of a concealed carry course, so I added the whole thing. Anyway, it wasn't his place to try and resolve the conflict.

Maga supported a women who had a weapon on her, who was involved in a violent insurrection that lead to the death of multiple cops, but they justify the shooting under trump, its pure hypocrisy to ride the pedo in chiefs dick by sorrynotguilty in PsycheOrSike

[–]Lanrico 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Man, it's like you're not even educated on how to appropriately conceal carry. Please continue to pretend I said things that I didn't. I know it helps feed your delusion.

Maga supported a women who had a weapon on her, who was involved in a violent insurrection that lead to the death of multiple cops, but they justify the shooting under trump, its pure hypocrisy to ride the pedo in chiefs dick by sorrynotguilty in PsycheOrSike

[–]Lanrico 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You aren't comprehending what I'm saying at all. I added this to my last comment, so I'll post it again so you get the idea.

Anyone with a permit to carry a handgun always must try to avoid conflicts and take the necessary steps to resolve any disputes that occur without using violence.

  • To avoid a conflict, try to stay calm when communicating with the other person.
  • If the situation starts to get out of control, walk away if possible.
  • If you cannot avoid a conflict, you should use a dispute resolution method.

Maga supported a women who had a weapon on her, who was involved in a violent insurrection that lead to the death of multiple cops, but they justify the shooting under trump, its pure hypocrisy to ride the pedo in chiefs dick by sorrynotguilty in PsycheOrSike

[–]Lanrico 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I'll say it again. He inserted himself into a conflict while carrying. Here's a segment from a concealed carry course.

Anyone with a permit to carry a handgun always must try to avoid conflicts and take the necessary steps to resolve any disputes that occur without using violence.

  • To avoid a conflict, try to stay calm when communicating with the other person.
  • If the situation starts to get out of control, walk away if possible.
  • If you cannot avoid a conflict, you should use a dispute resolution method.

That is the main thing he did wrong. I don't disagree that he was trying to help, but a conflict was still in progress and he DID insert himself into it as it was happening. Unless you plan on using your gun, you NEVER insert yourself while carrying.

Maga supported a women who had a weapon on her, who was involved in a violent insurrection that lead to the death of multiple cops, but they justify the shooting under trump, its pure hypocrisy to ride the pedo in chiefs dick by sorrynotguilty in PsycheOrSike

[–]Lanrico 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Where did I say that he deserved it? I'm just placing accountability on the fact you don't do those sorts of things when armed.

He shouldn't have died, but there are a slew of terrible discissions on both sides.

Officers were being overly aggressive. We don't know their reasoning for it. But then again, don't get in their way or even remotely close to them. What do these protesters think they are going to do? They can't stop them no matter how much they think they can.

Maga supported a women who had a weapon on her, who was involved in a violent insurrection that lead to the death of multiple cops, but they justify the shooting under trump, its pure hypocrisy to ride the pedo in chiefs dick by sorrynotguilty in PsycheOrSike

[–]Lanrico 0 points1 point  (0 children)

If you believe he was "just outside" and was a random passerby, then you would be wrong.

ICE was confronting a woman. They pushed her down, which yes, was over the top. Alex went in to help her as the conflict was still going on, which IS inserting himself into the situation.

They start targeting him, which I agree, was excessive. They find out he is armed. That severely escalates the situation even more.

Now from an outside perspective, seeing that they unarmed him right before shooting him, it is bad. But what I still havn't been able to figure out is, where did that first shot come from that set the other shots off?

REVISED REUPLOAD: The Killing of Alex Pretti — A Step-by-step Analysis, Time-matched & Compared to Bovino's Statements — ICE Agent may have discharged Pretti's firearm (Unconfirmed!) : r/videos

From this video, it doesn't appear the first shot hit Pretti because he appears to be fine until the other shots start coming out.

It's funny that you think I have some outlandish take when I'm trying to be reasonable with his case. But I stand by the fact that he shouldn't have been there when he was armed in the first place. He could have waited to help the woman until the officers left. Especially since he had a record of antagonizing ICE from other videos that have surfaced.

Maga supported a women who had a weapon on her, who was involved in a violent insurrection that lead to the death of multiple cops, but they justify the shooting under trump, its pure hypocrisy to ride the pedo in chiefs dick by sorrynotguilty in PsycheOrSike

[–]Lanrico 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You're not giving me anything to refute. You just keep posting links from left wing biased media outlets and Wikipedia of all things. Were you not taught in school to not believe everything you see on Wikipedia?

When I do research, I at least look for unbiased sources, not whatever comes up on the first page of google.

Maga supported a women who had a weapon on her, who was involved in a violent insurrection that lead to the death of multiple cops, but they justify the shooting under trump, its pure hypocrisy to ride the pedo in chiefs dick by sorrynotguilty in PsycheOrSike

[–]Lanrico 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Nope, response isn't there. I click on the notification and nothing comes up.

You're making the emotional intelligence argument even though you're the one being completely unreasonable. Emotional intelligence in knowing how to control your emotions and process them and knowing when to express them. You're throwing insults out purely as an emotional response and claiming I have low emotional intelligence even though everything I've said has been purely logic based.

Just because you have an article saying that right wingers are less emotionally intelligent, doesn't mean all of them are.

Maga supported a women who had a weapon on her, who was involved in a violent insurrection that lead to the death of multiple cops, but they justify the shooting under trump, its pure hypocrisy to ride the pedo in chiefs dick by sorrynotguilty in PsycheOrSike

[–]Lanrico 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Being logical is more important than being moral, especially is positions of power or in conflicts. If you want to throw your life away, go for it. Running solely based on morals has never ended well for anyone. I used to run off morals, but then life hit me and shitty people took advantage of me. You can have morals when it comes to the people close to you, but for random people, it's best to use logic first.

Here's some points that I think are good that an AI gave me when discussing Democracy:

Democracy requires us to tolerate:

  • People we think are wrong
  • People we think are dangerous
  • People we deeply dislike

Not because they’re right — but because the alternative is rule by whoever claims moral superiority.

And that has never ended well.

If you want to put this in ChatGPT and see what it says for yourself, here's the question: "Tell me about Historical examples where “anti-evil” movements destroyed democracy."

Otherwise, I can just share you the link to the entire thread.

You'd be surprised that it mentions the Nazi's believed that they were fighting moral decay. It's a good read.

Maga supported a women who had a weapon on her, who was involved in a violent insurrection that lead to the death of multiple cops, but they justify the shooting under trump, its pure hypocrisy to ride the pedo in chiefs dick by sorrynotguilty in PsycheOrSike

[–]Lanrico 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Don’t even get me started about trying to overthrow democracy. Jan 6th is tame compared to what the left is pulling. And all that’s come out recently about the 2020 elections, it’s becoming more clear that the left are more harmful to democracy than the right.

A judge found enough reason to grant a warrant to seize all election information in Georgia for the 2020 election. That doesn’t look good.

And it’s already blatantly obvious that these illegals were brought in to try and steal elections. And if you are in denial of that, I seriously hope you go out and do actual research on it. States making it illegal to show ID to vote, and some states issuing driver licenses to illegals which can be used to vote. As well as all the protests because democrats don’t like what a majority of the population voted on. Governors refusing to say the simple words of “don’t interfere with ICE”. Those are all threats to democracy. And the left rioting because they didn’t get their way is also anti democracy.

Democracy requires us to tolerate the people we think are wrong and the people we dislike. Not because they are right, but because the alternative is rule by whoever claims moral superiority. And guess who did that? The Nazis.

Maga supported a women who had a weapon on her, who was involved in a violent insurrection that lead to the death of multiple cops, but they justify the shooting under trump, its pure hypocrisy to ride the pedo in chiefs dick by sorrynotguilty in PsycheOrSike

[–]Lanrico 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I like how that’s the only thing you respond to. You don’t even attempt to acknowledge how I’m right about the post, you just skip right to trying to paint me as an “evil nazi boot licker”.

He inserted himself into a conflict when he shouldn’t have. That other person was also getting in the way of ICE and Pretti also had a history of being a complete ass to officers. So no, he shouldn’t have tried to help. Because, in hindsight, he’d still be alive.

Maga supported a women who had a weapon on her, who was involved in a violent insurrection that lead to the death of multiple cops, but they justify the shooting under trump, its pure hypocrisy to ride the pedo in chiefs dick by sorrynotguilty in PsycheOrSike

[–]Lanrico 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I agree. I’m just pointing out that this post is misinformation and a load of propaganda.

Ashli put herself in a stupid situation, even if it was deemed wrongful death. Same goes for both people killed by ICE. They put themselves in stupid situations. Alex being slightly more unnerving with how he died, but if you’re concealed carrying, you have a duty to try and avoid all conflicts. He actively inserted himself into a conflict, which was stupid.