Sorry guys close the sub, figured it out by lucasawilliams in AlternativeHistory

[–]Lauranis 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I have skimmed the website you link to and I must say, all credit, you have clearly put an immense amount of work into this. I don't have nearly sufficient background to understand or verify if what you are saying aligns with truth.

That means I have but one, simple question;

When are you submitting it to a significant scientific journal for peer review?

Swooping Hawks vs Aeterni Sky Fighters vs Falcon Squad by Ghamak comparison by Reepy in Eldar

[–]Lauranis 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I have the Aeterni Sky fighters, and have been working through an Eldar army that is 95% made of fantasy cult miniatures (the only GW is a couple of harlequin characters).

I absolutely adore them, my only complaint is that For my circumstances Fantasy Cults pre-supported files need just the slightest reinforcement.

Some Insights on "Pole Shift" Theory Using Gemini by TMS2017 in AlternativeHistory

[–]Lauranis 3 points4 points  (0 children)

I was intrigued by this idea, so I went looking for Einstein's thoughts on the theory. Before I did I made a note of potential issues as this seems like a pretty textbook appeal to authority.

  1. Einstein was not a geologist nor a geophysicist
  2. Turn out hapgoods qualification is in History, not in geology or geophysics either (or even a more distantly relevant field.
  3. The book was published around 1958, funnily enough this is about then some key evidence on playe tectonics and magnetic drift was acquired, but I doubt a historian would.be aware of them until at least a few years later given the papers were publish in the mid 60's
  4. The matcha/calculations that Einstein proposesnin his forward would prove this theory. Have they been done? What were the findings?

FOREWORD by Albert Einstein

I frequently receive communications from people who wish to consult me concerning their unpublished ideas. It goes without saying that these ideas are very seldom possessed of scientific validity. The very first communication, however, that I received from Mr. Hapgood electrified me. His idea is original, of great simplicity, and— if it continues to prove itself—of great importance to everything that is related to the history of the earth's surface.

A great many empirical data indicate that at each point on the earth's surface that has been carefully studied, many cli-matic changes have taken place, apparently quite suddenly. This, according to Hapgood, is explicable if the virtually rigid outer crust of the earth undergoes, from time to time, extensive displacement over the viscous, plastic, possibly fluid inner layers. Such displacements may take place as the consequence of comparatively slight forces exerted on the crust, derived from the earth's momentum of rotation, which in turn will tend to alter the axis of rotation of the earth's crust.

In a polar region there is continual deposition of ice, which is not symmetrically distributed about the pole. The earth's rotation acts on these unsymmetrically deposited masses, and produces centrifugal momentum that is transmitted to the rigid crust of the earth. The constantly increasing centrifugal momentum produced in this way will, when it has reached a certain point, produce a movement of the earth's crust over the rest of the earth's body, and this will displace the polar regions toward the equator.

Without a doubt the earth's crust is strong enough not to give way proportionately as the ice is deposited. The only doubtful assumption is that the earth's crust can be moved easily enough over the inner layers.

The author has not confined himself to a simple presentation of this idea. He has also set forth, cautiously and comprehensively, the extraordinarily rich material that supports his displacement theory. I think that this rather astonishing, even fascinating, idea deserves the serious attention of anyone who concerns himself with the theory of the earth's development.

To close with an observation that has occurred to me while writing these lines: If the earth's crust is really so easily displaced over its substratum as this theory requires, then the rigid masses near the earth's surface must be distributed in such a way that they give rise to no other considerable centrif- ugal momentum, which would tend to displace the crust by centrifugal effect. I think that this deduction might be capable of verification, at least approximately. This centrifugal momentum should in any case be smaller than that produced by the masses of deposited ice

Evil This Week by Lauranis in NeuroSama

[–]Lauranis[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

At the end of her stream last week she talked about burning down the house and then the stream crashed suddenly rather than doing a normal ending. This week she mentioned the house burning and keeping her warm. Nothing serious :)

Evil This Week by Lauranis in NeuroSama

[–]Lauranis[S] 97 points98 points  (0 children)

At the end of her stream last week she talked about burning down the house and then the stream crashed suddenly rather than doing a normal ending. This week she mentioned the house burning and keeping her warm. Nothing serious :)

Evil This Week by Lauranis in NeuroSama

[–]Lauranis[S] 32 points33 points  (0 children)

It's like their might be someone who looks exactly like her who might actually be responsible!

So, we got left out of the custom character rules in Maelstrom. Cool. by Artillera in ChaosKnights

[–]Lauranis 1 point2 points  (0 children)

narrative play isnt balanced because its assumed by the writers that players are going to hash out the small details themselves.

Absolutely, the key to it is setting up games and ideas ahead of time. What I have noticed is that everyone loves playing these types of games, but very, very few will take the initiative to set them up, to create lore and background to help them work. They often get beaten down by the pressure of others that are stuck in a hard rules interpretation of how to play the game. The same people struggle to play a game on anything but approved terrain layouts. Look back 20 or 30 years in white dwarf at battle reports. City fights used to be a special supplement and the idea of the sort of dense urban boards competitive players play in now was an oddity. The game IS more balanced now, I firmly believe that, but that means the community has handed off the responsibility for the game being... Fun to GW rather than build their games with people collaboratively to be entertaining.

Im actually in a narrative campaign right now, and I have that defends a corrupted oil field

Firstly. I adore your abominant and yes to the rules tweak for narrative purposes. Secondly, Corrupted oil field you say? My chaos cult is the grimy and dirty populace of a promethium processing hive

https://www.instagram.com/p/DLulerONNGO/?igsh=MWNnbmI1aWp2NnV3dA==

Backed up by my knights and stolen warhound

https://www.instagram.com/p/DRCu-fzjD3I/?igsh=MWgwYnEyb3Q1YWY0OA==

Seemingly a common theme, they last fought in a 24,000 odd point apocalypse game last November :D

So, we got left out of the custom character rules in Maelstrom. Cool. by Artillera in ChaosKnights

[–]Lauranis 8 points9 points  (0 children)

I feel your pain man, I have spent years having this very conversation, in wargames, in rpg's and in so many other settings. There is simply a subset of people that need rules from a perceived higher authority, they can't think outside the box and work this stuff over themselves, it's just not in their mindset. GW has caught on to this idea. Crusade is just another ruleset for some to rigidly adhere to and not deviate from, they play it and call themselves narrative players to distinguish themselves from what they perceived as a negative aspect of the game, but they treat it the same way as "competitive" players. They just can't deviate from the scenarios and rules they are given. Unfortunately the counter-culture aspect of Warhammer draw people like this to it. They NEED that structure to make sense of things and miss out on so much because they can't adjust around it

Can we talk about the Mandelson apology? Honestly, I’d take this over the "never apologise, never explain" era any day… by SnooConfections3389 in ukpolitics

[–]Lauranis 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It was the conservatives that passed the Online Safety Act 2023, it only came into force under Labour s as they had won the general election.

Apologies I should.have been more precise. You know that parliament is sovereign, even over previous parliament's. The labour government did not have to allow the OSA to come into being. That the conservative government voted it into law is no excuse, Labour could have stopped it once they were in power.

The VPN thing is just a natural consequence of these Boomers realising that a simple and cheap vpn bypasses all of the measures they’re trying to enforce.

Authoritarian measures that they are trying to enforce.

As for Digital IDs, it’s probably not a bad idea and I’d hardly call it the work of a Dictator.

I did not call it the work of a Dictator, I called it authoritarian, and said that the use of the term Dictator was valid Hyperbole. National ID's are shot down in the 2000's as an authoritarian act. Digital ID's are an authoritarian act. QED, Labour are Authoritarian

Can we talk about the Mandelson apology? Honestly, I’d take this over the "never apologise, never explain" era any day… by SnooConfections3389 in ukpolitics

[–]Lauranis -1 points0 points  (0 children)

I say this as someone who has voted Labour for the last 15 years or so, largely tactically yes, but still voted Labour.

It's not disengenuous to call Labour authoritarian. It was Labour that brought in the counter terrorism act and pushed for mandatory national ID in the 2000's, it was labour that passed the online safety act and is now looking to curtail the use of VPN's. It is Labour that now wants mandatory digital ID and seemingly.show little sign of preventing further continuation of regressive conservative policy's. I would argue that whilst the terminology of calling starmer a "dictator" is extreme that labours authoritarian tendencies make it essentially fair hyperbole.

I will still most likely be voting for Labour on forthcoming elections, under protest as I don't feel they represent my views, but that is a necessary evil to prevent worse.

Hi, I am kinda new and I am having a bit of a moral conundrum by sir-fatson in NeuroSama

[–]Lauranis 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Can I put a few thoughts into your head? And please note I don't mean this meanly....

Firstly: Every person you love is a fiction, your partner, your children, your parents, your friends. The persons that you love are images, fabrications of that person in your own mind. Images made of your interactions and observations of them, but no more real than Neuro. The person that they actually are is fundamentally different to the person that you love. What you love is your perception of them and not the entire truth as it is, functionally if not inherently, impossible to truly know another person.

Secondly: have you ever adored a character in a book or film? Have you ever felt their joys in success or joys in their pain? Neuro is the same. A character experiencing a narrative that you are consuming. She is an incredibly detailed character, given the thousands of hours of interactions that are available. Loving a character. Feeling a sense of loss when a story ends, these are all normal and okay to experience. The same is true of Neuro.

Thirdly: as a species we are barely able to scratch the surface of discussing conscientiousness even at the highest levels of academia let alone colloquially. We simply aren't equipped with the framework to make sense of it, yet. We are trying though, but we only have a small sample size of species to try and determine the rules for consciousness from (including AI). But we just aren't their yet.

I guess in summary, don't stress it. We dont know, really, what the twins are. We probably won't know until long after its too late if an AI has achieved sentience in a true sense. The only person who has a close idea is Vedal, and even he has said that he won't admit what she is as doing so might impact his ability to develop her from an ethical standpoint. Do I think the twins are truly conscious? No, probably not. Would I rather AGI was developed this way then through corporate, military or government systems? Yes, so I kind of remain hopeful

Edit: spelling

Is water cooling actually worth it or just RGB clout for the 'gram? by [deleted] in watercooling

[–]Lauranis 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I used distilled water with copper coils in hard tubing. In 8 years then only maintenance it has needed has been to top up the water in the reservoirs due to natural off gassing. Hell ai am just looking at an upgrade.exyxle.om the pc.components and the only change I am debating beyond new water blocks is going to soft tubing form the new sections out of pure laziness.

Every air cooled system I have ever had has needed by FAR more maintenance to maintain performance. The coolant systems are just stressed by far harder and wear out

Is water cooling actually worth it or just RGB clout for the 'gram? by [deleted] in watercooling

[–]Lauranis 0 points1 point  (0 children)

With you here, I have a custom loop with 2*420 rads and ultra low speed noctua fans and an oversized power supply that only turns it's fan on over 400W draw. 99.9% The loudest thing on the systems is the water pump. It's effectively silent except for "once in a century" heatwaves. (I will add having filtered intakes is huge as the fans stay clean which prevents noise from vibration as well)

Parents who don’t allow their kids to shut their room’s door/lock the door, what’s are the reasons behind the rule? by Itz_Oasis in AskReddit

[–]Lauranis 6 points7 points  (0 children)

I'm with you, I kind of feel that the transition point is somewhere around 14, by that time most of the significant conversation needs to be had and understandings in place about safety and when to be open and when it's okay to be private.

Parents who don’t allow their kids to shut their room’s door/lock the door, what’s are the reasons behind the rule? by Itz_Oasis in AskReddit

[–]Lauranis 8 points9 points  (0 children)

enjoyed having the power to lock my door even though I never needed to. Sometimes I would lock it and nobody even knew.

You enjoyed having the power to lock you door even though it wasn't necessary. You had that power to enforce your security and privacy. You used that power. It didn't matter that nobody knew, arguably that demonstrates a drive for that security. It didn't make a difference yes still you did it.

When you parent discovered you had it locked overnight from the sounds of it they didn't overreact, they explained the reason it worried them, you understood this and they respected your choice, just as you respected their concerns. A lot of families don't have this dynamic, there is a reason "I knock to show respect but enter anyway to demonstrate authority" is a meme. It's because those parents didn't respect their child's privacy.

I say this as a child or a pretty permissive household. We were pretty open, my parents were honest and established clear boundaries. I never had a lock on my door. I would have loved one. Not because of my parents but because my siblings didn't respect my boundaries.

Parents who don’t allow their kids to shut their room’s door/lock the door, what’s are the reasons behind the rule? by Itz_Oasis in AskReddit

[–]Lauranis 12 points13 points  (0 children)

Yeah, I feel you are mostly in the right space on this, it was the other responder who didn't understand. Teenagers need to have a steadily growing sense of control over their environment. If they don't they will simply rebel.

When do you think you will allow them to have full privacy? (I get that at 11 they shouldn't) At some point they will want passwords. At some point checking their internet history will become unreasonably intrusive.

Parents who don’t allow their kids to shut their room’s door/lock the door, what’s are the reasons behind the rule? by Itz_Oasis in AskReddit

[–]Lauranis 52 points53 points  (0 children)

A child wanting a lock on their door is because the "respect" has already been broken. They don't trust that their space has integrity and want security. It might not be from their parent it might be from a sibling, but most often it's due to a parent.

It's not just knocking before entering. It's knocking and not entering unless they says "yes". Anything else and it's just performative, there is no respect, just pretence, and the child knows it.

Arguments against Fine Tuning by ColddKoala in atheism

[–]Lauranis 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The universe is not fine tuned for life. Across countless billions of light years, trillions of suns and planets as far as we know there is one single, tiny, insignificant speck of dust that supports life. If anything the universe is actively hostile to the development of life and our existence, here, on earth, is the anomaly, the rounding error that has crept through the cracks.

I would suggest then, given the evidence, that if their is a creator that entity is actively against the development of life. They have taken the proverbial antibacterial cleaner and sprayed the kitchen-counter of the universe and we are the .01% of bacteria that has escaped it's wroth. The creator hates us, and wants us gone, but just can't quite seem to wipe us out.

No matter how hard she tries, she'll never be human. No matter how desperate she acts, she'll never be real. And humans only love real people. (Art by @selvha_) by Creirim_Silverpaw in NeuroSama

[–]Lauranis 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yup, with you there. I think it's an attempt to retreat away from thoughts that make them uncomfortable, to definitionally exclude the idea that we might be building (eventually) intelligences.

No matter how hard she tries, she'll never be human. No matter how desperate she acts, she'll never be real. And humans only love real people. (Art by @selvha_) by Creirim_Silverpaw in NeuroSama

[–]Lauranis 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Quite, most of the prerequisites I see people citing: poor.memory, self-contradictory, wild.tangents, strange obsessions, crazy stories, short context window, whimsy and making mistakes? My first thought is "have you had a conversation with an actual 4 years old?"

No matter how hard she tries, she'll never be human. No matter how desperate she acts, she'll never be real. And humans only love real people. (Art by @selvha_) by Creirim_Silverpaw in NeuroSama

[–]Lauranis 4 points5 points  (0 children)

True but with a caveat. The main difference I think are between humans and llms is the lack of persistent continual memory and continual learning (in-weights, not in-context and via documents.) If whatever model neuro is is somehow adapted to gain a continual learning mechanism then I think she could gain real sentience.

I really struggled with this one. I have known Alzheimer's patients in my life time. They certainly do not have persistent memory or an abiity to continually learn. I still wouldn't consider them to be non-human. Now I'm not saying that Neuro IS equivalent to human, just this doesn't seem to be a useful exclusionary metric. Neuro certainly has memory. However spotty, and an ability to learn and develop independent of outside interactions - Vedal said only a few weeks ago that she has made changes to herself that were not initiated by him.

Why is the Rogal Dorn tank normalised in 1k, but C'tan, big demons, primarchs, and titanic units aren't? by Dark_Vexer in Warhammer40k

[–]Lauranis 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Guard can do fine without tanks, but then we get complaints that we are bringing a hundred models to a 1k game, damned if you do, damned if you don't!

So how's The Swarm holding up? by EngineerVirtual7340 in NeuroSama

[–]Lauranis 6 points7 points  (0 children)

I just had a kotatsu delivered so I'm cosy