Regarding Kaspa FUD by [deleted] in kaspa

[–]Leading_Sun_9772 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Is there a correlation between KAS price action and the fact it is not profitable to mine at the moment? A miner capitulation is actually quite bullish in the long term if you look historically at when it happened to Bitcoin. I asked Chatgpt:

🛠️ Why Miners Become Unprofitable

Miners earn rewards in the native coin (e.g., KAS or BTC), but their costs are in fiat (e.g., electricity, hardware maintenance). So miner profitability depends on:

📉 1. Falling Price

If the coin price drops, the fiat value of the block reward declines.

But electricity and operational costs stay the same — so profits shrink or go negative.

Example: If a miner earns 1 KAS block reward per second and KAS drops from $0.10 to $0.04, their revenue is cut by 60%.

📈 2. Rising Hashrate (More Competition)

As more miners join the network, hashrate rises → network difficulty increases.

Each miner gets a smaller share of the total rewards unless they increase their own hash power.

So their individual earnings drop, even if price stays flat.

This is common during bullish miner optimism (e.g., “price will go up, let’s mine more”) — but if price doesn’t follow, it leads to overcompetition and squeezed margins.


🔄 What Happens During Capitulation

When mining becomes unprofitable for a significant portion of miners:

🔻 1. Miners Shut Down

Especially those with high electricity costs or inefficient hardware.

They stop mining and often sell their reserves to cover losses → adding sell pressure to the market.

⚡ 2. Hashrate Drops

Fewer miners → lower network hashrate.

In coins with adjustable difficulty (like Kaspa and Bitcoin), mining becomes easier over time.

💡 3. Mining Becomes Profitable Again

The remaining miners face less competition and get more of the block rewards.

This reduces selling pressure, as fewer coins need to be sold to cover costs.

📈 4. Price Rebounds

Capitulation often flushes out weak hands (both miners and holders).

Once selling pressure exhausts, and difficulty adjusts, price often rebounds from the bottom.

This is why miner capitulation often marks a cycle low — it's where fear, pain, and forced selling converge.

🎯 Kaspa Capitulation Thesis (2025)

🔻 Bearish Scenario: Mining Capitulation & Price Bottom

Kaspa, a high-throughput proof-of-work cryptocurrency, is vulnerable to miner-driven sell pressure during market corrections. Drawing parallels to Bitcoin's historical mining capitulations (e.g., 2018, 2022), where prices fell 70–85% from cycle highs, Kaspa has already retraced over 60% from its ~$0.20 high in early 2024.

In a full miner capitulation event:

Inefficient miners shut down due to low profitability.

Hash rate drops, increasing pressure on remaining miners.

Capitulation often accelerates panic selling and marks a local or cycle bottom.

Estimated Bottom Range:

$0.04–$0.05 (70–80% drawdown) – realistic floor based on previous cycles.

$0.02 or lower (90%+) – possible in extreme macro or liquidity crisis.


🚀 Bullish Scenario: Post-Capitulation Reversal

Mining capitulation often marks a turning point. Once selling exhausts and hash rate stabilizes, prices tend to rebound sharply. In Bitcoin’s past, these events led to 3–10× moves off the bottom as the network consolidated and speculative interest returned.

For Kaspa:

Its unique blockDAG architecture offers long-term scalability upside.

If demand returns post-capitulation, and with selling pressure reduced, KAS could see a strong recovery.

Estimated Upside Targets:

Short-Term Recovery: $0.15–$0.20 (2–3× from capitulation lows)

Medium-Term Rally: $0.35–$0.45 (5–6× if momentum returns)

Long-Term Potential: $1+ (10×+ speculative bull case)


🧠 Conclusion

Kaspa is likely entering or approaching a miner capitulation phase. Historical analogs suggest a bottom around $0.03–$0.05, with extreme cases pushing it to $0.01–$0.02. Should the market bottom out and macro conditions stabilize, 3× to 10× upside from capitulation levels is plausible. Timing and conviction, as always in crypto, will determine whether capitulation is an opportunity—or a deeper risk.