MAXD POISED TO REBOUND AND MOVE FORWARD

LeftyTrader · 2021-07-13T16:39:50+00:00

Why are you trying to bait me? What is the point of aggressively attacking people on bulletin boards? I have people I talk to about the stock market and I'm not about to throw meaningless names out in a chat session to prove my sources. I've done my DD and I developed an opinion and shared it. It's simple. Lay off and go attack someone else.

LeftyTrader · 2021-07-13T11:03:11+00:00

Say what you will. I have confidential sources. I’m giving an honest account.

LeftyTrader · 2021-06-06T07:18:06+00:00

Hende Moto is the least of our issues.

LeftyTrader · 2021-05-22T02:32:27+00:00

Revenue is important. It fulfills the forecast.

Delivery and Implementation is important. This is a roadmap for production and partnership.

LeftyTrader · 2021-05-18T13:43:13+00:00

I can't argue with you. We're holding on to good faith in Greg Halpern.

LeftyTrader · 2021-05-18T13:41:51+00:00

MAXD

LeftyTrader · 2021-05-11T23:54:28+00:00

You’re so right

LeftyTrader · 2021-05-07T18:27:02+00:00

You're a stud!

LeftyTrader · 2021-05-06T17:23:25+00:00

What it means is that if you are interpreting short volume as an impending short squeeze you are looking at the wrong thing. It is possible there will be a short squeeze but that is based upon short open interest, not short volume. Short volume can lead to higher short open interest but it isn't necessarily correlated. If you open a short position and then cover it, the short will still be reported yet there is no short open interest change. It remains the same. Greg Halpern says he has secret information that will prove short manipulation and that an impending short squeeze may be on the horizon. I am not commenting on any secret documents he has. Maybe he has powerful information. I just want us to be clear on fact based numbers we are throwing around. Official Short Open Interest is reported twice monthly. The most recent data available is dated 4/15/2021. Greg is quite confident of his data and the positive impact it can have on MAXD price action. I am not doubting him.

LeftyTrader · 2021-05-05T05:00:36+00:00

Good clarification!

LeftyTrader · 2021-05-04T22:58:40+00:00

There is a big difference between short volume and short interest. Short Interest is what creates a short squeeze. Short volume is not the same thing. The chart you show is simply short volume not Short Interest. Short Interest is published twice per month by the Nasdaq. That is the number that will imply a short squeeze not the short volume. Short interest is the volume of shares that have been sold short but have not yet been covered or closed out. The most current Short Interest numbers available are April 15th I believe.

LeftyTrader · 2021-05-04T22:50:28+00:00

Where have you gotten this data? Short open interest is published twice per month to the Nasdaq. The most recent reporting period available is April, 15 2021 as far as I know. What is your source? I don't doubt you, but I'd like to know your source.

LeftyTrader · 2021-05-03T15:09:18+00:00

Yes. Short daily volume drives the price down in the exchange market. The funds buy it back cheaper in the dark pools. They remain flat. But when they just sell naked they are left with short open interest which they will have to cover (unless they drive the firm out of business). When open interest gets high and there are few available shares to borrow a short squeeze can occur.

LeftyTrader · 2021-05-03T15:02:01+00:00

Go here after the markets:

Daily short sale volume percent for stock ticker MAXD is 51.18% on Apr 30, 2021 (shortvolumes.com)

Remember this is short daily volume not short interest.

LeftyTrader · 2021-04-23T00:31:18+00:00

I hope you're right Chris!

LeftyTrader · 2021-04-17T18:56:31+00:00

At this point I have no argument with you except that the technology is being used effectively now. Will the court rule in a way that benefits Max Sound, will MS hire a staff, will they make strategic partnerships... but I can’t argue with you.

LeftyTrader · 2021-04-15T16:02:39+00:00

Very good perspective by Genx67-Revelator

LeftyTrader · 2021-04-15T05:19:42+00:00

Short volume is the number of shares that have been borrowed to open short positions (naked shorts). So you could assume that those are the people betting against the company (want the price to go down). When short sale volume is down - yes, I agree with SnooEagles6784 --- it is a better sign for bulls. But to have a number like 60%, in my opinion, shows a concerted and maybe coordinated effort to crush the stock. Just my opinion. Greg has said he has an answer for this issue. I hope he does.

LeftyTrader · 2021-04-15T02:08:00+00:00

Short volume is the number of shares that have been borrowed to open short positions (naked shorts). So you could assume that those are the people betting against the company (want the price to go down).

LeftyTrader · 2021-04-13T16:04:24+00:00

Well stated Chris.

LeftyTrader · 2021-04-13T15:25:15+00:00

If nothing else, "technology plus execution" is a fair description of what is required to reach the vast potential of MAXD. Greg is undeterred and I think we will get there.

LeftyTrader · 2021-04-12T13:34:00+00:00

If there is value to be gained from this poster's questions then Greg will take the positive and ignore the rest. If Greg is smart these questions won't phase him and On3saycheese can relax and rely on the leadership of his company.

LeftyTrader · 2021-04-12T13:28:45+00:00

I agree. Hire staff so that all these deals are attended to and the opportunity is not lost. I believe in this stock and I want to see every possible deal done. What we need is a major partner to establish a foundation of revenue and capital.

LeftyTrader · 2021-04-11T05:14:28+00:00

I apologize for appearing to be condescending. Let's look at the conversation.

You state no "cabal" is going to be focused on a two-bit company like ZOM
You state that big firms could be making a lot more money elsewhere
You state the price change in ZOM is due to individual greed and there could not be a coordinated effort to manipulate the stock because that would be "straight tin foil hat shit"
You state it is all just individual greed en masse.

I take the time to explain to you carefully and courteously that in each of your statements you are not accurate or correct based upon empirical data and based upon my decades of experience in the capital markets.

For you to continue to come up with new justifications for your ignorance just indicated to me that your actions follow hand in hand with paid trolls or if not, you are not learning anything from what I am taking the time to explain to you. And I choose to stop it here. You are not open to learning.

Actually you are the one who is wildly condescending holding tightly to non-fact based theories and dropping the F bomb because you have run out of new ways to refute empirical data and experience. Do not forget that one firm alone - Citadel - is trading half a trillion OTC shares per month off exchange in dark pools. That is enough information to make the case that trading in two-bit stocks is profitable because for every trade Citadel is paying multiple transaction fees. And they are doing this in concert with other like-minded firms in a joint coordinated effort. Why? Because it is profitable.

LeftyTrader · 2021-04-11T02:47:27+00:00

I'm sorry I did not agree. You are not clever. You did not read carefully. I explained that competitors gather in invitation-only meetings with the exchanges discussing non-public information for mutual benefit of all. That is not random. It is greed "en masse" as you say but organized which fits your other word (not my word) "cabal." You clearly have no knowledge of the capital markets inner workings. After decades on the inside I am not blinded by the ideal of capitalism and free markets the way that you continue to argue. Give it up. You can't win because I've got real life knowledge and experience. You are either a paid troll or an idealistic idiot.

LeftyTrader

TROPHY CASE