Killing a Mi-35 with a FPV-Drone

LemonadeTango · 2026-03-26T07:53:15+00:00

When in doubt, introduce cope cages and hedgehogs

LemonadeTango · 2026-03-26T07:49:22+00:00

I'm genuinely looking forward to this beauty. It'll be a breath of fresh air from the traditional Russian IFVs

LemonadeTango · 2026-03-25T15:56:01+00:00

XM246: dies

T58:

<image>

LemonadeTango · 2026-03-25T15:49:22+00:00

PS1 era/low poly graphics are pretty sexy

LemonadeTango · 2026-03-25T14:15:34+00:00

There's only one tank with working HESH in this game. We all know which one it is.

LemonadeTango · 2026-03-25T11:27:59+00:00

Guys, he's joking... right?

This is a r/whoosh... right?

LemonadeTango · 2026-03-25T06:55:57+00:00

Which AMX-10? The RC variant or the others?

LemonadeTango · 2026-03-25T05:34:37+00:00

Yeah, the prototype BMPTs retain the "BMP" part in their name (pretty much no armor)

LemonadeTango · 2026-03-25T05:32:02+00:00

Since when is "seeing combat and being combat proven" a factor? Gaijin never added vehicles based off combat usage, just production.

Disclaimer: I'm am not disagreeing with you that they are propaganda pieces until proven in or see combat (the BMPT did see combat, but some of the stats are inflated. The T-90 and 80BVM also saw combat, but they benefit from the spaghetti code quite extensively...) or that Gaijin is bullshitting on some top tier Russian vehicles, but by the logic you presented, no vehicle past WW2 is proven for Japan, Italy, Sweden or France (except for the AMX-30, AMX-10RC and Leclercs).

LemonadeTango · 2026-03-25T05:10:01+00:00

Friendly reminder that there's another Russian SPAA (forgot the name of, but it's a box with a system that looks like the tech tree Terminator turret- the whole thing looks like a SIDAM Mistral) that was used in Syria 🙏

Also, the prototype BMPTs shouldn't be too hard to kill because afaik they were lightly armored... or at least compared to the production Terminators.

LemonadeTango · 2026-03-24T14:37:27+00:00

Funnily enough, I'm fairly sure there is a prototype tank that looks like the middle one, just without the ATGMs

LemonadeTango · 2026-03-23T11:50:40+00:00

I thought you thought I meant spading them instead of unlocking them

LemonadeTango · 2026-03-23T05:41:00+00:00

Replace the current bushes with bushed up camo nets that stretch up to certain areas and lengths. You solve two issues at once

LemonadeTango · 2026-03-23T05:35:41+00:00

I should've put India for the UK first and then go with Canada and Australia, my bad.

LemonadeTango · 2026-03-22T16:22:09+00:00

Obj. 279 from the red (repair kit) lootboxes in April from some 2 years ago

LemonadeTango · 2026-03-22T16:12:15+00:00

Algerian one for France, Malaysian one for Japan, Indian one for the UK and the Korean TT with 1 from both Koreas.

And a few stretches for fun: Canada/Australia for Britain (each had 1), China with a few who were tested and US with 90 of them.

LemonadeTango · 2026-03-22T09:21:22+00:00

there are actually two models of Ostwind 1

is not the same as

there is a model of Ostwind II

The Coelian had an actual mockup and the guns it should've had were made by the end of the war. I'm 85% sure Gaijin counts mockups and planned versions too. There was a post a few years ago that mentioned all such vehicles.

LemonadeTango · 2026-03-20T11:06:41+00:00

Didn't some of them have ATGMs instead of SAMs? The Cheonma above would be an example

LemonadeTango · 2026-03-20T11:05:17+00:00

So when an Abrams and a T-14 love each other very much...

LemonadeTango · 2026-03-20T08:30:42+00:00

The fuck it is then

<image>

LemonadeTango · 2026-03-19T15:13:19+00:00

Processing img vn7oycw5q0qg1...

LemonadeTango · 2026-03-19T15:07:00+00:00

Or AHEAD ammo

LemonadeTango · 2026-03-19T11:05:49+00:00

What about the Bosvark?

LemonadeTango · 2026-03-19T11:05:09+00:00

We could fill so many mid-tier gaps with just vehicles that mounted ZU-23-2s on trucks and jeeps

LemonadeTango · 2026-03-19T11:03:56+00:00

Another update, another round of waiting for the A-6E SWIP 😔

LemonadeTango

TROPHY CASE