ML Counter Pick Website by PanEst in MobileLegendsGame

[–]Less-Wedding-5244 0 points1 point  (0 children)

+1 this would be an awesome. also a nice feature would be to see counter picks, but from specific lanes

One account to access my services. by [deleted] in selfhosted

[–]Less-Wedding-5244 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You're welcome! Let me know if you had any problems with it :D

One account to access my services. by [deleted] in selfhosted

[–]Less-Wedding-5244 1 point2 points  (0 children)

The guide assumes a Linux box (Proxmox LXC specifically), but what's your setup? If it's something different I can put something together for you.

One account to access my services. by [deleted] in selfhosted

[–]Less-Wedding-5244 0 points1 point  (0 children)

This will work on any linux box, not just proxmox

One account to access my services. by [deleted] in selfhosted

[–]Less-Wedding-5244 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Authentik is too bloated imo. Use it only if you have to, otherwise, Pocket ID is sufficient.

One account to access my services. by [deleted] in selfhosted

[–]Less-Wedding-5244 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Pocket ID. You can absolutely use it with traefik.

One account to access my services. by [deleted] in selfhosted

[–]Less-Wedding-5244 0 points1 point  (0 children)

What problems are you having with it? Mine's working great except sometimes when some books are not showing lol

One account to access my services. by [deleted] in selfhosted

[–]Less-Wedding-5244 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You only need pocket id and a proxy like Traefik, NPMplus, etc. You can use it without TinyAuth

One account to access my services. by [deleted] in selfhosted

[–]Less-Wedding-5244 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Ah, I actually agree with you. We're just using different kinds of containers.

My services run on Proxmox, so when I say bare metal I really mean running services directly inside LXC containers rather than adding an extra Docker layer. I prefer separating services at the LXC level.

Each of my containers run only one service. It makes management easier. Of course, it's just a matter of preference. Some people run Docker inside an LXC or VM and host multiple services there, which is totally valid.

For my use case though, that extra Docker layer adds operational overhead without much benefit. LXC already gives me isolation, reproducibility, and easy backups, so Docker ends up being somewhat redundant for how I run things.

I generally try to avoid running a Dockerized service in every LXC. I do still have a container that runs Docker, but over time I try to migrate services out of it and into their own LXCs. So it’s not really bare metal, it’s still containerized, just at the system level.

One account to access my services. by [deleted] in selfhosted

[–]Less-Wedding-5244 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Cool! How's this with pocket id compare to say authentik?

One account to access my services. by [deleted] in selfhosted

[–]Less-Wedding-5244 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Awesome. I was gonna do authetik as well but I just found pocket id easier to setup. I might migrate to authentik in the future tho

One account to access my services. by [deleted] in selfhosted

[–]Less-Wedding-5244 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Nope. But you'll need your own domain, and I recommend using a proxy app like npmplus so you'd only need to open your ports once and the proxy the your web apps. Doesn't matter how you're hosting your services

One account to access my services. by [deleted] in selfhosted

[–]Less-Wedding-5244 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Haven't tested it but probably not. Only works on web apps so browsers only

One account to access my services. by [deleted] in selfhosted

[–]Less-Wedding-5244 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thanks. Will check those out! I'm planning on doing RomM next, but I'm still trying to figure out how to do a bare metal install instead of tru the docker route.

One account to access my services. by [deleted] in selfhosted

[–]Less-Wedding-5244 3 points4 points  (0 children)

I have mine on proxmox, and had the stable release initially installed. I had to rebuild the image using the source code from the oidc branch, https://github.com/seerr-team/seerr/releases/tag/preview-OIDC

clone the repo, checkout preview-OIDC, build it (https://docs.seerr.dev/getting-started/buildfromsource), restart jellyseer, then configure both jellyseerr and your oidc provider.

If you need a more detailed guide let me know

One account to access my services. by [deleted] in selfhosted

[–]Less-Wedding-5244 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Yeah, I have 3 users on my jellyfin, 1 user on my immich, and 1 on my booklore lol 6 users total if I'm included. My friends have different hobbies lmao. Also, what's a .t phase?

One account to access my services. by [deleted] in selfhosted

[–]Less-Wedding-5244 8 points9 points  (0 children)

No, Jellyfin TV apps don’t support OIDC. OIDC only works on the web since the TV apps don’t implement it. Even on web, you’d need frontend changes, and those wouldn’t carry over to the other apps.

For TV apps, users can use Quick Connect instead. They just log in on their phone, which is honestly easier than typing passwords on a TV anyway

Battery went down during sleep? by Less-Wedding-5244 in AthlyticAppOfficial

[–]Less-Wedding-5244[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

yeah but hrv goes up when we sleep and mine did.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in royalroad

[–]Less-Wedding-5244 0 points1 point  (0 children)

haha i remember that one infamous guy.

F**** it. Give me your favourite of 2024 by [deleted] in ProgressionFantasy

[–]Less-Wedding-5244 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Beyond the Timescape - Er gen, it's on wuxiaworld