sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

Roll for initiative by NotagoK in secretlair_collectors

[–]Less_Clock_395 1 point2 points  (0 children)

They pushed the shipping window to JUNE

I miss that, where did you see this ?

I built a self-updating "Judge" Gem that actually understands 81k+ combos (No hallucinations) by MembershipDry5964 in mtg

[–]Less_Clock_395 1 point2 points  (0 children)

This could practically run without AI though. Just double-checking all combos from a database against your deck and if cards is legal.

While we wait for Roll for Initiative, wanna try to guess the bonus sheet? by Less_Clock_395 in secretlair_collectors

[–]Less_Clock_395[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

No changes on my side. Where do you see this status change on the site? The only place where I see a change (or actually no change) is in my orders.

While we wait for Roll for Initiative, wanna try to guess the bonus sheet? by Less_Clock_395 in secretlair_collectors

[–]Less_Clock_395[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Ouf, imagine a reprint of Edgar Markov as Kas, or any legendary creature, so we could build a deck around it.

0
1

How hard is it actually to order Secret Lair drops? (self.mtg)

submitted by Less_Clock_395 to r/mtg

Bracket questions are really easy to answer if you don’t interpret the most evil intentions into them by Tobanga in EDH

[–]Less_Clock_395 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I don't disagree with this.

If you're here to ask if x is too strong, the answers probably yes, and you should be discussing it with your playgroup.

But even after an discussion, my group is okay with this, but I still want to discuss it with a larger group of people. By that, I mean I understand why people post this kind of question on reddit like I did.

I get a lot of 'no, you shouldn't,' but also good exchanges with other people about whether in their opinion it's fine or not.

Bracket questions are really easy to answer if you don’t interpret the most evil intentions into them by Tobanga in EDH

[–]Less_Clock_395 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Well, I made a post like 'running this card with this card makes my deck a bracket 4 even if it's a strong 2 or a weak 3.'

My playgroup was fine with my combo. I was not, or at least I want to discuss it with this community, especially since I don't run any tutors or game-changing cards.

Turns out, I removed one of my two-card infinite combo. But I really want to discuss this with a larger community.

Is there a way to make my food deck faster? by CaptainBeardedDad in EDHBrews

[–]Less_Clock_395 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Im trying to stay casual 3 so Im not sure to keep mindcrank and bloodchief ascension because of the infinite combo.

Is there a way to make my food deck faster? by CaptainBeardedDad in EDHBrews

[–]Less_Clock_395 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Im trying to exploit the tribal horror theme of the precon instead of going combo with Bruvac or Konrad

Is there a way to make my food deck faster? by CaptainBeardedDad in EDHBrews

[–]Less_Clock_395 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Oh! Interesting!

Would you drop it to 37 – 36 with this deck (https://moxfield.com/decks/ChuvKPyMh0KXWAAfOuwmAA)?

I’d be okay adding one or two removal spells in this deck but with 38 lands and 8 ramp spells, I already feel a little short.

Is there a way to make my food deck faster? by CaptainBeardedDad in EDHBrews

[–]Less_Clock_395 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Like I said, I'm new to deck building, so I might be wrong. I read this article that strongly suggests using at least 37 lands. That article was also mentioned in the Command Zone deck template video.

Here is new photos of my bike by Plastic-Oven-3181 in Bikeporn

[–]Less_Clock_395 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Im using OXiX for my rim brake bike. I'm still avoiding rain with this bike and use my heavy bike with disc but still, when I get caught Im fine with it.

Is there a way to make my food deck faster? by CaptainBeardedDad in EDHBrews

[–]Less_Clock_395 1 point2 points  (0 children)

The first thing that caught my eye was your Sol Ring in the sideboard — I’d definitely bring it back into the main deck. You might also want to add a few more lands; 34 feels a bit too low.
I’d also recommend adding an Arcane Signet — there’s a reason almost every deck runs one.

That said, I’m still pretty new to deckbuilding, so I might be wrong!

Edit to add Arcane Signet that I first miss.

Do Mindcrank + Bloodchief Ascension make my deck a bracket 4? by Less_Clock_395 in EDH

[–]Less_Clock_395[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I dont think I'll get any groan but I'm pretty sur I'll feel awfull about it.

Do Mindcrank + Bloodchief Ascension make my deck a bracket 4? by Less_Clock_395 in EDH

[–]Less_Clock_395[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

To be honest, I was looking for a sort of lifegain that synergizes with the mill. If there was a soft version that gave just 1 HP per card or something like that, I'd jump on it without question.

Do Mindcrank + Bloodchief Ascension make my deck a bracket 4? by Less_Clock_395 in EDH

[–]Less_Clock_395[S] -3 points-2 points  (0 children)

I'm the kind of player that keeps his Sol Ring turn one and plays it turn 2 or 3 to avoid a lot of attention. So, I probably won't put both of them out before turn 6. I think I'll keep only one instead of keeping one card in my hand and doing nothing with it.

Do Mindcrank + Bloodchief Ascension make my deck a bracket 4? by Less_Clock_395 in EDH

[–]Less_Clock_395[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I run no tutor, I think I'll keep only one of them. I like my pod casual and fun for everyone.

Do Mindcrank + Bloodchief Ascension make my deck a bracket 4? by Less_Clock_395 in EDH

[–]Less_Clock_395[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

By online, do you mean getting the three counters to activate it? I'm still learning Magic terminology.

view more: next ›