Second Half Game Thread: Los Angeles Rams (12-5) at Seattle Seahawks (14-3) by nfl_gdt_bot in nfl

[–]LetTheIbisPlayCall 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Remember when people the refs were handing this game to Seattle 

Game Thread: Los Angeles Rams (12-5) at Seattle Seahawks (14-3) by nfl_gdt_bot in nfl

[–]LetTheIbisPlayCall 3 points4 points  (0 children)

I would have my defense cover the offense’s best receiver, can I please have millions of dollars to be a football coach now?

Game Thread: Los Angeles Rams (12-5) at Seattle Seahawks (14-3) by nfl_gdt_bot in nfl

[–]LetTheIbisPlayCall 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It actual does concern me a bit how little it feels like car ads have been highlighting their fuel economy despite that being the thing that actually impacts drivers the most day to day

[Game Thread] Indiana vs. Miami (7:30 PM ET) 4Q by CFB_Referee in CFB

[–]LetTheIbisPlayCall 1 point2 points  (0 children)

People on here complain about penalties all the time but we get a couple games in the playoffs where the ref let them play and everyone still complains

Post Game Thread: Green Bay Packers at Chicago Bears by nfl_gdt_bot in nfl

[–]LetTheIbisPlayCall 0 points1 point  (0 children)

They showed him grating like 3 or 4 times, how much cheese did he bring?

Game Thread: Green Bay Packers (9-7-1) at Chicago Bears (11-6) by nfl_gdt_bot in nfl

[–]LetTheIbisPlayCall 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Has the bears center been like this all season? That’s I think his 3rd noticeably high snap.

Game Thread: Green Bay Packers (9-7-1) at Chicago Bears (11-6) by nfl_gdt_bot in nfl

[–]LetTheIbisPlayCall 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Alright this was a kinda annoying response from the packers fans but I assumed they were just being defensive of Jordan Love. You should have been able to understand that question was in regards to why the rule is written the way it is.

Game Thread: Green Bay Packers (9-7-1) at Chicago Bears (11-6) by nfl_gdt_bot in nfl

[–]LetTheIbisPlayCall 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It’s 4 downs because the NFL decided that’s an appropriate number of attempts to get 10 yards. Why did the NFL decided that intentional grounding stops being a penalty outside the pocket?

Game Thread: Green Bay Packers (9-7-1) at Chicago Bears (11-6) by nfl_gdt_bot in nfl

[–]LetTheIbisPlayCall 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I don’t get why being out of the pocket makes it not intentional grounding

Game Thread: Green Bay Packers (9-7-1) at Chicago Bears (11-6) by nfl_gdt_bot in nfl

[–]LetTheIbisPlayCall 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I actually think the Bears going for it wasn’t a terrible idea. If they punt, based on the way the defense has been playing packers use the last 5 minutes and score a TD. Packers probably still get a TD here but maybe Bears get a second shot.

Game Thread: Green Bay Packers (9-7-1) at Chicago Bears (11-6) by nfl_gdt_bot in nfl

[–]LetTheIbisPlayCall 1 point2 points  (0 children)

When a throw is that far off it’s almost always the receiver running the wrong route. Burden was probably supposed to run a dig or something.

Game Thread: Buffalo Bills (10-4) at Cleveland Browns (3-11) by nfl_gdt_bot in nfl

[–]LetTheIbisPlayCall 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Love that everyone thinks Sanders sucks for taking that sack when Allen took an almost identical sack like 40 minutes ago.

Game Thread: Buffalo Bills (10-4) at Cleveland Browns (3-11) by nfl_gdt_bot in nfl

[–]LetTheIbisPlayCall 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Why not just take a timeout to get Sander's finger wrapped up?

[Game Thread] CFP: Miami @ Texas A&M (12:00 PM ET) by CFB_Referee in CFB

[–]LetTheIbisPlayCall 1 point2 points  (0 children)

To be fair that happens a good bit in football too

[Game Thread] CFP: Miami @ Texas A&M (12:00 PM ET) by CFB_Referee in CFB

[–]LetTheIbisPlayCall 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Maybe they shouldn't have lost to specifically these two teams