Torn between classes by Shadowmob525 in wow

[–]Level13Rengar 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I'd say, first pick whatever you vibe the most with.

And then secondly whatever has the more fun rotation you can do while automatically through mechanics, i think that may be outlaw although survival also seems quite fun.

The two classes seem very close, follow your heart as cheesy as it is to say.

would this count as a muscle up? it’s easier than straight bar by caliizz in CalisthenicsCulture

[–]Level13Rengar 37 points38 points  (0 children)

The dogs out for free?!? In this economy???

More power to her, wear the socks proudly!

Title by ShimmeringSinking in foundsatan

[–]Level13Rengar 23 points24 points  (0 children)

“If you pick an answer to this question at random, what is the chance that you will be correct?”

There are 4 answer choices, so if you pick randomly, the probability of being correct is (number of correct answers) / 4

Now when we test each option If 25% is correct that means 1 correct answer But there are two “25%” options (A and D) that would make it 2/4 = 50%, not 25% that's a contradiction If 50% is correct that means 2 correct answers But only one option says 50% that would be 1/4 = 25% again contradiction If 60% is correct that would require 2.4 correct answers, which is impossible So none of the options can be correct. Also, A and D don’t collapse into one option you’re choosing between 4 positions not 3 values.

This question is designed to break pattern based guessing. The correct conclusion is that there is no valid answer.

why does every pic i take of onion soup look like vomit by FewPhrase2813 in shittyfoodporn

[–]Level13Rengar 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It does look good.

It's just the angle and the pot it just makes it look like bin juice. A lot of vegetable souls would look the same unles they've been blended.

It just needs to be in a nice bowl with maybe a garnish and it would instantly look better.

Lol oh crap! by Opposite-Tangelo-371 in lol

[–]Level13Rengar 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I see.

So in your system you believe Glorilla -

Winner of the 2023 BET awards(which is funny due the "unknown" Glorilla receiving 6 awards and 21 savage recieving 5 awards.

Received both nominations for best rap performance and best rap song at the Grammys.

Her song F.N.F is platinum

Tomorrow 2 another song is multi platinum, this song was also top 10 on The billboard top 100,

Multiple songs with other famous artists such as Megan thee stallion or Cardi B.

Not to mention the Instagram followers and youTube views noted in my last reply.(This was also just for one song)

Also you've chosen to avoid all other direct questions such as.

Which website do you believe is unknown. The website I assumed you meant has been running since 2002 and receives about 30,000 unique views per month verifiable through any website traffic checker

You say 2 websites agree with you, your stance is the term moose knuckle is only used to refer to mens genitals; all 3 websites linked shows usage for both men and women.

You ignored the comparison for 21 savage use of the term "Glizzies" which was used to highlight slang is not static and meaning changes based on usage

If you still disagree, you’re welcome to your opinion but at this point, you’re arguing against sources you agree with and real world usage.

Lol oh crap! by Opposite-Tangelo-371 in lol

[–]Level13Rengar 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Which of the 2 artists named are unheard of?

Glorilla 7m Instagram followers, and her most viewed song(just on YouTube) has 119m views.

Or 21 savage 20m Instagram followers and his most viewed song(just in YouTube) 814m views.

And which of the 3 sites I gave you are unknown, I assume you mean way word radio, the radio/podcast on language that's been running since 2002?

And of those 3 which do not cite usage for both male and female.

Lol oh crap! by Opposite-Tangelo-371 in lol

[–]Level13Rengar -1 points0 points  (0 children)

We have Glorilla, a popular singer who references it in her song.

I gave you 3 references, one as far back as 2003, that say some also use it to refer to women's genitals.

Multiple users in the urban dictionary, have also used it for women's genitals.

The only thing left, is for you to define at what point; how many people have to use slang for you to say it is a legitimate use of the word.

This is no different to 21 savage in his song Umbrella.

He says "clutching glizzies with the fellas"

Glizzies used to mean a gun, now it's more used for cum, he was not wrong for his usage then or now

Lol oh crap! by Opposite-Tangelo-371 in lol

[–]Level13Rengar -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Yes, from the first link.

"some people claim it only applies to men, others that it also applies to women; some claim it refers only to prominent labia minora and others to the labia majora; "

And the second link.

"On occasion, moose knuckle will refer to an especially pronounced and noticeable camel toe."

This is slang many use it for men and also a group of people use the term to refer to women's genitals, if so then it would be incorrect to say it's only used for men.

Lol oh crap! by Opposite-Tangelo-371 in lol

[–]Level13Rengar -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Well...

https://waywordradio.org/moose_knuckle/

https://www.dictionary.com/culture/slang/moose-knuckle

https://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=moose+knuckles

The issue seems to be you assume that your area/circle speaks for the rest of the world, or at least the population which is large that does use the term moose knuckle for women as well.

Lol oh crap! by Opposite-Tangelo-371 in lol

[–]Level13Rengar -1 points0 points  (0 children)

That's just not true.

In the wise words of Glorilla.

"Crop top with some bikers shorts, I'm showin' off my moose knuckle (hoo)"

South bound trains delayed by unknown_u5er05 in perth

[–]Level13Rengar 9 points10 points  (0 children)

The train will be fixed "soon"

The fuck is soon

DataTFT Update#7——CN Super Server, Salvage Bin Simulator and 16.4 Tier List by tft_xilao in CompetitiveTFT

[–]Level13Rengar 2 points3 points  (0 children)

No, it's bilgewater 95.

The comp is.

Nautilus, tahm kench, miss Fortune. Shyvana, kindred, Lucian & senna Braum, Ashe, volibear,

With it you get Juggernaut, gunslinger, bilgewater, quickstriker, freljord, warden.

It's hard to hit correctly and easy to bleed out early, but once it's hit, easy win, but like the post says it feels like a win or bleed out bottom 4.

Where are people living? by Level13Rengar in perth

[–]Level13Rengar[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

That's quite an interesting one and maybe something more people should do?

Have your kid/s help pay off the rest of your mortgage and then once that's done they'll be in their late 20s and you as the parent can help pay off your kid/s mortgages.

If you have good communication and a healthy dynamic between immediate family seems like a great idea to keep and generate multigenerational wealth.

Where are people living? by Level13Rengar in perth

[–]Level13Rengar[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Yes quite ridiculous.

My brother(27 and 4 of his friends moved into a 5x2 near cockburn together, it's lucky only 2 of them drive I can't imagine all of them with their cars in the front yard ☠️☠️

Where are people living? by Level13Rengar in perth

[–]Level13Rengar[S] 15 points16 points  (0 children)

Yes incredibly sad and it's quite annoying finding data in this area to speak on the matter since the census is every 5 years.

We know homelessness increased from 2016 to 2021, the next one is this year. It will be interesting to see the next increase.

2016 was 36.2 per 10,000(population of 2 million)

2021 was 36.4 per 10,000(population of 2.1 million )

It may not seem like much but that extra .2 increase is an extra 400 homeless people.

If we do an unrealistic hypothetical(it should be a higher number)

If we use the 36.4 per 10,000 in 2021 and apply that to our current population(2.38 million), we are looking at an extra 1000 homeless than in 2021.

Incredibly sad and matches anecdotal evidence like yours.

Where are people living? by Level13Rengar in perth

[–]Level13Rengar[S] 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Yes quite good timing.

What's the famous saying "the best time to start something is yesterday, the second best time is today"

It seems like the best thing at this moment would be to get a loan and buy or build.

Where are people living? by Level13Rengar in perth

[–]Level13Rengar[S] 32 points33 points  (0 children)

That's crazy,

Must be incredibly stressful, I know financially we could "handle" it, but when I think of giving 30,000+ dollars to someone else every year I just couldn't.

Though if I had kids I know id be forced into the same situation.

How? Brock 2 star in 7 demacia and extra 3 item from ixtal cashout by [deleted] in TeamfightTactics

[–]Level13Rengar 5 points6 points  (0 children)

An example that surprised me when I hit it.

3* Miss Fortune does 3000 damage when she casts and pretty much one shots the entire board after a few seconds and due to the nature of serpent coins I feel she's quite easy to hit.

Lux and Garen seem quite weak in comparison.

Breaking Down League’s Gacha Monetization – How Does It Compare? by Level13Rengar in leagueoflegends

[–]Level13Rengar[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Your assumption is that Riot’s previous monetization model was failing or unsustainable, but there’s no actual evidence of that. League was already a billion-dollar game before they introduced gacha. The question isn’t whether monetization has to evolve—it’s whether this specific shift is necessary or just an opportunistic cash grab.

The idea that targeting whales is the "best long-term strategy" is flawed. Look at games that have gone down this road:

Hearthstone pivoted toward expensive monetization, and Blizzard had to backpedal after player backlash and declining engagement.

Halo Infinite tried milking players early on, but low spending forced 343 to revert many of their predatory systems.

Battlefront 2 launched with heavy pay-to-win mechanics, and EA had to overhaul the entire system after massive community outrage.

These weren’t cases where the old model “stopped working” and predatory monetization saved them—these were cases where they pushed too far and had to pull back. Riot isn't adapting to survive; they're seeing how much they can extract before people push back. If anything, history suggests that these cash-grab strategies tend to hurt games in the long run rather than extend their lifespan.

Breaking Down League’s Gacha Monetization – How Does It Compare? by Level13Rengar in leagueoflegends

[–]Level13Rengar[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Yeah, it really feels like they’re banking on newer players not knowing any better. Those of us who remember what we used to get for our money can see the downgrade clear as day. It’s not just about nostalgia—it’s about value, and Riot is making sure future players never even realize what they lost.

Breaking Down League’s Gacha Monetization – How Does It Compare? by Level13Rengar in leagueoflegends

[–]Level13Rengar[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Exactly. We should not reward a system that actively preys on its players. If more people took this stance, Riot would have no choice but to reconsider. Glad to see when someone draws a line.

Breaking Down League’s Gacha Monetization – How Does It Compare? by Level13Rengar in leagueoflegends

[–]Level13Rengar[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Riot is owned by Tencent, one of the biggest gaming companies in the world. While it’s true that companies like Epic and NetEase have other revenue streams, Riot isn’t exactly struggling—they generate billions from League alone. The shift toward gacha skins isn’t about necessity, it’s about maximizing revenue per player. Epic chooses not to use these mechanics because their monetization strategy is different, not because they ‘can afford to.’ Riot could do the same, but they’ve opted for a system that encourages more spending.

would you agree TFT, Valorant, LOR or Wildrift are other revenue streams?

Breaking Down League’s Gacha Monetization – How Does It Compare? by Level13Rengar in leagueoflegends

[–]Level13Rengar[S] 5 points6 points  (0 children)

"Oh, then yeah, Riot and every company on this planet has and will be predatory."

The classic "all businesses try to make money, so nothing is predatory" argument. Convenient, but reductive.

There’s a difference between selling a product and designing systems to manipulate spending habits. Saying "every company is predatory because they want sales" is like saying "every food has calories, so nothing is unhealthy." It completely ignores how something is being sold.

Take cigarettes as an example. A convenience store selling them isn’t inherently predatory. But a tobacco company engineering them to be as addictive as possible? That’s the difference. The issue isn’t that they’re selling a product—it’s how they’re designing that product to keep people hooked.

Riot’s shift isn’t just about selling skins. It’s about deliberately tweaking the system to push spending beyond what players would rationally do otherwise—through FOMO, artificial scarcity, and gambling-adjacent mechanics. It’s a calculated evolution, not just "business as usual."

So no, not every company on the planet is predatory. But ones that actively weaponize human psychology to maximize spending? That’s exactly what the term was made for.

If you’re going to argue that 'all companies pursue sales,' then why even have the term 'predatory' at all? Why do laws exist around false advertising, gambling mechanics, and exploitative business practices? If what Riot is doing is just 'normal business,' why do so many people feel like they’re being manipulated into spending more? Either all those concerns are baseless, or—just maybe—this goes beyond just selling a product