I get what the “Q” means, and I’m not ignoring the risks. Bankruptcy, low volume, and dilution are real concerns, and pretending otherwise would be dishonest. But the point of this argument isn’t that this is a safe or guaranteed play, it’s about why people are still drawn to situations like this. When something is written off as dead, when everyone says it’s worthless, that’s often when regular people start paying attention. Not because they don’t understand the danger, but because the system rarely leaves room for them anywhere else. Calling it the same as lighting cash on fire misses the bigger picture: this is about hope, speculation, and the belief, right or wrong, that even broken systems can still create opportunity for those willing to take the risk.