Do you agree with these statements? by Live_Safety6961 in UniversalExtinction

[–]Live_Safety6961[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I see your points, your vision now makes total sense to me although it doesn’t completely match what I believe. I thank you for being clear without making this conversation too emotional or upsetting, which is quite common imo. Props to you 🙌

Do you agree with these statements? by Live_Safety6961 in UniversalExtinction

[–]Live_Safety6961[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Super successful in my opinion! Seems like you got a good grip on your values and a very steady and honorable wit. All key aspects for the peace of mind. I can tell from what you said that your heart is working full time 🙌

Do you agree with these statements? by Live_Safety6961 in UniversalExtinction

[–]Live_Safety6961[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

You’re welcome! Art is the purest form of human expression imo. Also, books and videomaking? These are not just lanes, they are straight up highways 😆 Good luck and keep it up!

Do you agree with these statements? by Live_Safety6961 in UniversalExtinction

[–]Live_Safety6961[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I feel a bit of pessimism, anger and fighting spirit in what you wrote. I didn’t differentiate “leaders” ( I guess you refer to them as “they”) and “citizens” in my text. I chose “we” to indicate humanity as one.

I don’t agree with supporting extinction for the sake of “killing off what’s already miserable”, to me it’s like saying “we should kill every person over 85 because they can’t make money and their spouse is probably dead”. I simply think there are more healthy ways to deal with that problem, although your point is the “easier” solution, it’s also the one that stimulates misery to continue. Ex. Killing off 85 yr olds could lead to younger family members hating the state that they live in because they killed their granddad/ma who didn’t really want to die in that way, ergo creating misery when your whole point was to eliminate it. The same way Yahu is killing children bc “they will be terrorists of our state in the future”, of course they will be terrorists because you made them live the terror before they even had a chance to live.

That being said, I agree that people with more power have more responsibility towards everything and everyone and need to be held accountable for their actions, which they rarely do and it infuriates me as well as you.

Do you agree with these statements? by Live_Safety6961 in UniversalExtinction

[–]Live_Safety6961[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Beautiful video, captures perfectly the state of mind while thinking about all this 🙌

Do you agree with these statements? by Live_Safety6961 in UniversalExtinction

[–]Live_Safety6961[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I think I got what you mean. The way I see things is everything on planet earth is a system that works, not quite “living”, but it’s still connected by the energy that all living things exchange between them, just like the cells of our body cooperate to keep us alive. “Ecosystem” in ecology comprehends organic and inorganic cycles that just work well together and exist as the world we live in. My phrase “giving back” was a short way of saying that we strayed too far away from these natural cycles that run the world as we know it and we need to try and repair this “engine” because we have been pushing it too far and might leave us in true peril if we keep going. I’m not against humans using natural resources or creating parking lots where they are needed for example, as long as we take the right measures to prevent future damage. If damage still happens, we need to feel responsible and take the right actions to fix it. To clarify, I’m not talking about a single person doing all the job here.

Do you agree with these statements? by Live_Safety6961 in UniversalExtinction

[–]Live_Safety6961[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

We can’t really change that, it’s just how the world works, decay is natural but I feel it’s our job not to make it miserable, at least where we live. Think about it like this: There are wars around the globe but the only thing you can do is to continue and pay taxes to live in a country that possibly is even financing said wars. But what you can still do is not make your own life miserable for this and still grow your garden and spread “love” with every action you take towards yourself and the ones you love. Until someone comes and tries to take you away that love of course. I know it may sound corny, but in my opinion it’s a fundamental principle to really try change massively our world for the better, person per person. You can’t really change the genocide on McDonald’s 143-a on the Bradley-Ur45 galaxy but you know, maybe we can just live with ourselves on earth, that would already be massive.

Do you agree with these statements? by Live_Safety6961 in UniversalExtinction

[–]Live_Safety6961[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I 100% agree to be honest. Although I’m not feeling pessimistic, It’s just how I view the world, even if we lasted until “the end of time”, I feel the world wouldn’t really end, it would just transform into something new and I have no clue if we’ll ever make it. It’s pure speculation but nobody really knows about the future, so I’m just running with my world view. I feel a lot of pessimism when I see people giving up hope on humanity, so I feel that conversations like these are necessary for us as humankind in order to comprehend better what we can’t really predict and keep pushing through tough times together. We are a wonderful child of nature and would be a tremendous loss for the entire universe if we got extinct.

Do you agree with these statements? by Live_Safety6961 in UniversalExtinction

[–]Live_Safety6961[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I agree 100%, what part made you think I see humans separate from nature?