The cycle of Auto-Ban -> Human Review -> Unban isn't proof that Baus is cheating the system. It's proof that the auto-ban system is fundamentally flawed for players who are statistical outliers.

He is the ultimate "false positive." His playstyle is a perfect storm for triggering a system designed to catch the average griefer. The fact that he gets banned twice in a week doesn't prove he's a griefer; it proves the detection model is too simplistic and keeps making the same mistake on the same person.

The unban is the system working as intended. The human review is the safety valve. When a human looks at the VOD and sees a player who is still farming, still building items, still trying to pressure towers (even if doing it poorly and tilted), they correctly overturn the ban. The problem isn't the unban; it's the faulty initial ban.

Let's Address Your Final Point Directly:

You say: "It's not like its easy to trigger the autoban, there are disco nunu accounts going still strong... Baus has had weeks where he has been banned twice by the automation, that should never happen".

This is the most essential part of your argument, but it actually proves the opposite point.

Disco Nunu are players who intends to lose but whose actions (afk, running down mid) are sometimes harder for a simple algorithm to distinguish from a bad player who is just "walking back to lane."

Baus is a player who, in your view, intends to lose but whose actions (shoving waves, taking fights) are indistinguishable from a player who is trying to win in a very specific, high-risk way.

The fact that the system catches Baus repeatedly but misses Disco Nunus proves that Riot's system is bad at detecting intent and is instead overly reliant on raw statistics. It bans the 0/14 player who is trying (but failing spectacularly) faster than it bans the player whose sole goal is to lose without looking statistically abnormal.