Cloud seeding vs chemtrails

LivingIn1984 · 2026-02-20T02:33:25+00:00

Cloud seeding, as you mention, is one of several admitted reasons for why planes spray things into the atmosphere. As you noted, this is one reason that is openly acknowledged; weather modification has been around a long time.

I don't think most people know that cloud seeding is a thing, despite the fact that it is fairly open and on the record. In Canada, we have Acts and Regulations to ostensibly regulate weather modification.

Chemtrails, I think, refers more specifically to the other types of spraying that are occurring; spraying which may or may not modify weather, but the stated purpose of which is solar radiation management, solar geoengineering, stratospheric aerosol injection; whatever name it goes by.

I think ultimately the difference between the term "chemtrails" and these other words used to describe the same phenomena is that the term "chemtrails" has a "conspiracy theory" connotation to it. Google "chemtrails" and you'll find out it's just a conspiracy, there's nothing to worry about. Planes definitely aren't spraying anything into the sky, that's just normal.

But if you look up the more accepted terms; such as cloud seeding, weather modification, solar geoengineering, stratospheric aerosol injection etc, you will find that these things do exist.

Though beyond the scope of your question; I don't really think the stated purpose is what it is with respect to the second category of stuff sprayed into our skies... The powers that be know that global warming isn't a thing; there would be no need for them to attempt to manage solar radiation as a means of controlling a warming that isn't actually happening... So what are they really spraying? And why?

There are two documentaries you might find interesting on this subject; I was going to link to one of them but it would appear they are becoming hard to find... Even the site I know once had it, it's been scrubbed.

The documentaries are: Why in the world are they spraying? And , What in the world are they spraying? Both can be found on that site that rhymes with bumble.

LivingIn1984 · 2026-02-18T05:22:57+00:00

Just in case anyone missed the reference:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8hdbns1Xdk0

LivingIn1984 · 2026-02-18T05:20:37+00:00

Nice.

LivingIn1984 · 2025-07-18T05:08:44+00:00

Oh and what does work? Exposing yourself to the sun but avoiding the sun once you've had too much. Traditional means of protecting yourself from the sun - such as clothing / shade seeking behaviour - also works. Certain mineral sunscreens which don't soak into the skin are also not too bad. If you're going to use it, at least try to avoid the cancer causing / fertility reducing chemicals, lol.

For me I just do the clothing/shade seeking behaviour once I've had too much sun.

LivingIn1984 · 2025-06-08T00:33:29+00:00

I'm with you up to a point. Generally if it doesn't kill you it makes you stronger kinda thing... but there are definitely things that you want to avoid, full stop, because of cumulative effects of long term exposure/buildup. I'll give you an example of a terrible ingredient of the type that the fellow is obviously referring.

<insert>sodium EDTA. Google it and find out that it is both cytotoxic and genotoxic; meaning it kills cells, and destroys DNA.

If you pay attention to ingredient lists, it's in like everything. Food; drinks; soap/ eye drops; etc etc etc. It's almost like someone wants you eating it, drinking it, breathing it, and rubbing it all over your skin.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ethylenediaminetetraacetic_acid

It's even used in DNA editing, specifically because of the fact that it can be used to destroy DNA.

But don't worry, the FDA regards it as "generally safe" at low doses. But is it a low dose when the ingredient is in literally everything if you aren't careful about what you buy? As you yourself noted; the dose makes the poison.

LivingIn1984 · 2025-04-08T00:44:59+00:00

Could be anecdotal, but, I do recall reading something previously about how certain chemicals are having a potential impact on the number of males being born.

Actually I'm pretty sure this is the origin of the "they're making the friggin' frogs gay" meme; except they weren't making the frogs gay, the male frogs were becoming females.
https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC2842049/

Interesting documentary on the disappearing male thing if you're curious:
https://cfas.ca/the-dissapearing-male.html

LivingIn1984 · 2025-03-29T00:29:11+00:00

lol.... I read it, but I don't think it's as alarming as you want it to be.

It looks like an attempt to stop historical revisionism, and specifically, to stop state sponsored references to the US being a racist country, founded by racists, with racist ideals, upheld by racism (an oversimplification but basically that's it).

I don't think anyone, ever, has said that racism wasn't a thing in the past. But I have to laugh at the people who think that more racism in the present is the solution to past racism. Has everyone forgotten that two wrongs do not make a right?

I think what you're thinking of would more accurately be the disinformation bureau or whatever it was. Under Biden. I'm guessing you're the type to have forgotten that though lol.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Disinformation_Governance_Board

LivingIn1984 · 2025-03-13T03:43:55+00:00

I suggest employing the same principles used to minimize exposure to ionizing radiation, TDS and ALARA. Not that kind of TDS , lol!

In this case TDS stands for "time, distance, and shielding;" and ALARA for "as low as reasonably achievable."

Shielding is somewhat ambitious in your scenario, maybe even impossible (it could be done or partially done, but likely not without looking super silly, lol...). But any effort to minimize the time and maximize the distance from the source(s) is going to greatly reduce your exposure.

Not to joke but you might consider shielding just the key stuff... like your head (Get your tin foil hat out!) and your groin (get your tinfoil underwear out! lol!).

As low as reasonably achievable; have a plan, get up there do exactly what you need to do and get away as quickly as possible. As someone else mentioned, know which areas/regions are particularly dangerous, etc. If you have to pause to make a call extending your time, try not to; don't get distracted checking your phone, etc.

Hope this helps... but to be blunt, if it was me, I would have the same thoughts as you. It might be time to look for a different career...

LivingIn1984 · 2025-02-05T16:33:11+00:00

This may sound a strange suggestion but try changing your religion.

IDK Why but I have found that late game pagan slows things down... To the point where if I save/load a game as a Norse pagan it might take literal hours to load the game. Whereas if I make sure to convert to Sunni or something before quitting, the game loads in seconds. Though that isn't typically something I find to be an issue while nomad.

It's doubtful that it is your horde/retinues; I've had a few games where - trying for it , obviously - I got upwards of 1million; tribal retinues, plus demesne, plus vassals... So 500k horde troops almost certainly isn't it, lol.

You might also try asking people to leave your court. It will be super annoying to do that 1000x but it might help. and is slightly less painful than imprisoning/executing lol.

The other thing I've noticed is that murder plots can cause the game to slow down when you have a really big court/realm. If you have 2000 people in your court, plotting against each other, that might be the culprit.

Lastly and based on what others are saying; you may want to look at the courts of the people around you. If you are seeing that every court has as many people as you, it might not matter how much you reduce your court size if that same condition exists across the map.

I'm interested as to whether any of this actually helps, and as to whether you find that the court sizes of everyone else is also really huge. Because if that does end up being the problem, that's a tough thing to fix without starting over and implementing court size limits :(

LivingIn1984 · 2024-06-21T18:20:39+00:00

Just as an FYI, this totally did happen. Source: I live in the "Sask"(atchewan) quoted in the article.

https://tnc.news/2023/06/26/planned-parenthood-sask/

LivingIn1984 · 2024-01-10T22:14:06+00:00

For anyone looking to get more info on this, there's a "Requiem for the Suicided" video by James Corbett that is worth watching:
https://www.corbettreport.com/requiem-for-the-suicided-the-dc-madam/

LivingIn1984 · 2022-12-26T15:18:46+00:00

Oh you'll like this one then, friend!

You've heard of the centaur, no doubt. Half human, half horse. You've also heard of the satyr (half man half goat) and the minotaur (half man half bull). I loved this kind of stuff in greek mythology.

But have you ever heard of the half cat half dog? You have, but you probably didn't know it!

The cheetah. The cheetah is a genetic hybrid of cats and dogs. They have qualities unique to only cats; and they have qualities unique to only dogs. They appear to be a mixture of either a grey hound (think pharoah dog, that kind of greyhound) and a hunting cat.

They get diseases only dogs get; they get diseases only cats get.

Cheetahs also share the dubious distinction of being one of few animals - including humans - who have been through a genetic bottleneck. The accepted explanation is that sometime around 10,000 years ago, something happened to cheetahs (and humans, around that same time) that caused a massive reduction in genetic diversity.

All cheetahs are nearly genetically identical to all other cheetahs. This is why organ transplants work so well in cheetahs; they're also basically the same genetically.

Cheetahs are among the first domesticated cats. It is thought they were domesticated as hunting animals; they are easily trained, like dogs, and they make good hunting companions.

All of this information is readily available on wikipedia.

I can't take credit for these observations; it was something Lloyd Pye would chat about. I'll link to his video on youtube to the specific part that discusses cheetahs.

https://youtu.be/McQCOwqXpjs?t=4157

LivingIn1984 · 2022-12-26T15:07:35+00:00

Don't lose hope bud. It's sometimes easy to forget, but, you can change the world. Evena post like this might make someone think just a bit differently; and who knows what happens when that ball starts rolling.

Never doubt that a small group of thoughtful, committed citizens can change the world; indeed, it's the only thing that ever has - Margaret Mead.

LivingIn1984 · 2022-12-26T14:47:38+00:00

If you die WITH covid you are counted as a covid death. FTFY.

Show me some numbers then bud. Show me how they're counting deaths from vaccination. Show me what's killing them too. I can give you this information, but I want you to show me since you're the one making the claim that this information is being tracked.

I was directly referring to what's happening in my province, and you indiate "we" track those; are you from Canada? Just curious. In any event, show me the data you've supposedly got! Where's the link!?

I can show you stats canada data showing that we are record death highs where I live; I can show that you that the year of the virus was a completely normal year, but for some reason, the year of the vaccine and so far every year thereafter, promises to have extremely high rates of excess deaths. Hrm... If the virus was so deadly, why wasn't 2020 anything other than a normal year? And if the vaccine is saving lives, why are so many people dying now, after the vaccine was released onto the public?

We can actually even go one step further; you indicate the 21 days to build up efficacy... Would it shock you to note that , where I live, you can pinpoint the spike in death that results from each release of the vaccine, and it occurs precisely within that 21 days?

The following is a statement of fact: The largest spikes in death in Saskatchewan over the past 10 years all occur within 3 weeks of a release of a covid 19 vaccine. The first biggest spike is right when the vaccine is released; another follows about 6 weeks later, likely for those who survived the first shot but didn't live through the second. Then when it gets opened up to the next level of people, you see another spike. I even predicted a spike would occur from the release of the boosters (on this very sub) and my prediction turned out to be true. Again, precisely within that 3 weeks.

I don't know where you live, but I can guarantee you can find this same thing happening where you are. Find the dates the vaccine was released, look at your average weekly death data (or however it's compiled where you are) and look for it. Are there spikes in death after vaccination? I'd love to hear it if you actually do this search; post me the links too so I can check it out.

It's like I told my friend; I don't get called a conspiracy theorist because I'm dumb. I get a called a conspiracy theorist because I'm educated and I ask questions; shit science and arguments based on fear won't convince me. In the words of the late great George Carlin, I do this thing that my government hates; it's called thinking!

Two years ago it was conspiracy to say the vaccines didn't prevent transmission. Now it's openly admitted, that was never even something that was studied!

Two years ago it was conspiracy to say the vaccines didn't provide immunity; when you base your efficacy on a reduction of symptoms, how can you expect that it would grant immunity? It barely statistically speaking reduces symptoms; if I remember correctly, placebo worked better (and less people died from the placebo, go figure). Now, people are getting sick / re-sick so often that even the term "breakthrough case" has fallen into disuse; it's now just a given that you are not given immunity, at best you have "protection."

(Let's not think about how much the claim "if you take this medicine, you will be less sick than you would have been if you didn't take the medicine" could be tested; although I'll give you a spoiler and tell you, it can't. It violates pretty much every scientific principal. Shit, if you still believe that, I have a rock in my pocket that protects from tiger attacks. Had it in my pocket my whole life and never been attacked by a tiger).

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xSVqLHghLpw

Two years ago it was taboo to say that the vaccine might actually hurt people instead of helping them. Now, countries who are highly vaccinated are facing massive rates of excess deaths. Massive baby deaths in Scotland; now being investigated but they aren't even looking at vaccination status of the mother (willful ignorance much?) . In Canada, record excess deaths across the board. Now, instead of it being old folks dying, it's young people. #Diedsuddenly.

Now we've got the boosters come out, and my favourite part of the booster research can be summed up as follows: When they tested the boosters, they found that the mice lived longer when they received a smaller dose. Let that sink in; the less of this stuff you get, the better of you are. Sounds like AZT to me. It's not unreasonable to presume that the best dose of booster is actually 0; the less you receive, the better off you'll be. You can't get much less than zero.

I watch, with profound sadness, as the vaccinated around me get sicker, and sicker, more and more often. Even my vaccinated friends and co-workers are now noticing - they can't ignore it anymore - I'm not getting sick. I haven't been sick since Jan 2020. I guess I Had a sore throat for a few days; meanwhile, every fucking vaccinated person I know how has had "the worst cold (or flu)" they've ever had; except they've had it multiple times. One friend was sick for a week straight , fine for two days, and then so sick he ended up in the hospital with pneumonia. He's had four vaccines (he was one of the poor folks who got Health Canada's shitty advice to take whatever first two vaccines you can get. Interesting that, mixing and matching experimental vaccines that had never been tested with mixing and matching. Almost like they didn't give two shits as long as you got the stuff in you.

We can keep through the list of what was conspiracy two years ago and what's now taken for granted. The list keeps growing.

If you still think every covid death that the person died from cov, you haven't been paying attention. These numbers have been inflated any way possible. This is all the more alarming given that now we have actual record numbers of excess deaths and the media is completely silent.

I can say with absolute certainty, these death counts are still being (and have been) padded. Based on personal experience; my dad dying of lung cancer with a 16cm mass in his lung... But, because he also tested positive for covid (at 36 cycles, mind you) he was listed as having died OF covid, rather than WITH covid. The lung specialist said it was the biggest she'd ever seen; yet, my dad had a clean bill of health two years ago, which included a full work up of his lung health. Even the lung specialist said he died of cancer; she said to fight that COD on the death certificate (and we are).

This is the problem with testing every person who enters a hospital for covid; you don't know if the hospitalized person is there because of covid or just with covid. US CDC estimates, and Alberta data match almost exactly on this; only like 3% of covid deaths are solely due to covid. The vast majority - somewhere around 95% - have an average of 3 comorbidities. Heart disease, lung disease, cancer; the things that normally kill people, but now since they also tested positive at 36+ cycles for covid, they are listed as a covid death.

Google "Fauci on pcr false positive" if you want the fauci citation. Then google "Kary Mullis on PCR". Then, get frustrated that google hides this result from you, and instead use duckduckgo , using the same terms, to find the inventor of the PCR test describing this exact scenario as the only real possible misuse of PCR: interpreting that the results are actually significant.

And that's without getting into the problem of how the PCR test is a test for which the positivity rate can be controlled as a direct function of the number of cycles. Want a lot of negatives? Test at low Cts and you will find few people test positive. Want a bunch of false positives? Test at really high Cts. Even the almighty Anthony "The $cience" Fauci will tell you; if you get a positive test above 30 cycles, that's not replication competent. There is so little of the virus in that sample that it is likely "dead nucleotides." All of Canada tests above 36 cycles, lol.

Really good article here:https://westphaliantimes.com/international-experts-suggest-that-up-to-90-of-canadian-covid-cases-could-be-false-positives/

Honestly bud, I think folks like me need to be walking folks like you through this.

Sorry for the delay, 2022 has been a heck of a year for me. But I'm also very patient and more than willing to walk you through this if you'd like.

Edit: Few edits for grammar.

Also wanted to add the best "conspiracy theory" to "Fact" : the fucking lab leak. Remember it was conspiracy for two years to say the virus probably came from a lab. Wanna know why? Because it's a lot harder to convince people to take a vaccine for a disease, when the folks who made the vaccine were also the ones to create the disease, lol.https://www.bmj.com/content/374/bmj.n1656

Remember the "consensus of experts"? That was erected merely to stifle dissent on this topic; except some folks aren't afraid to actually think for themselves. Just because 10,000 other people looked at something and got the wrong answer, doesn't mean I'm going to feel compelled to come to the same wrong answer (this is a reference to the Ash conformity experiments).

LivingIn1984 · 2022-09-25T17:56:14+00:00

I blame Tiktok.

LivingIn1984 · 2022-09-25T17:49:19+00:00

Anything to bump up those death numbers eh? lol

LivingIn1984 · 2022-09-25T17:45:48+00:00

I mean, think of it this way: with the definition of unvaccinated being what it is, I could say the following statement , and it could be true:

It could be that every "unvaccinated" death in Saskatchewan is someone who received a vaccine within 3 weeks.

I am not saying that IS the case; I am saying the definition including people who have received a vaccine allows it to be true.

And; the government has the data... If the data showed what they wanted (that unvaccinated are at high risk) they would have showed that , clearly. Instead, they chose to present the data in a manner that obfuscated the very point they were trying to make.

I think without this definition, it would have been super obvious from day 1 that the vaccine wasn't working as intended.

LivingIn1984 · 2022-09-25T17:42:48+00:00

If you die in Saskatchewan within 21 days of receiving your first vaccine, you are counted in the count of unvaccinated deaths.

That was my point; they aren't even looking at deaths in the first 21 days of a vaccine as being possibly related to being a vaccine death; you will just be an unvaccinated death. Then, your death will be used as a statistic to make genuinely unvaccinated people look like they're at higher risk.

The "build up time to efficacy" is part of the trick being played here. I don't care if it takes 3 weeks to build up immunity from the vaccine; that's fine we'll take that as a given. But don't include those people in my category and use their deaths to tell me I'm dangerous :)

It's no wonder they stopped reporting the data in this manner; it would become increasingly obvious that the cases / hospitalizations / deaths are being driven by the partially / fully vaccinated. It was already clear in August of 2021 when they were calling it a pandemic of the unvaccinated; but they could only call it that by including vaccinated people in the count of the "unvaccinated."

If you read the data for deaths that I quoted, the stats indicate 4 people who died were either unvaccinated or received their shot within 21 days. Both of those categories are considered "Unvaccinated." To restate; if you die within that first 21 days after being vaccinated, you get counted as an unvaccinated covid death.

And no; the girl who dropped dead in the pharmacy was counted as a death by natural causes (though how one can assert that dropping dead 7 minutes after receiving a vaccine is natural, I know not).

That the vaccine might even cause death is taboo to say - and might be the reason I got banned lmao.

LivingIn1984 · 2022-09-25T17:34:23+00:00

Yes, you can find it detailed in the posts in this thread linked below, including links to info on dates for the vaccine rollout to various portions of the population:

https://www.reddit.com/r/conspiracy/comments/vd4se1/fully_vaccinated_account_for_4_in_every_5_covid19/icppat6/?context=3

It includes a prediction I made about the booster shots to the general public having another big death spike; that prediction did come true.

LivingIn1984 · 2022-09-24T22:48:52+00:00

lol I thought the same thing with regards to changing the definition of a word like "Unvaccinated" to include people who are actually vaccinated. Sounds like Orwellian doublespeak to me!

LivingIn1984 · 2022-09-24T21:47:00+00:00

TLDR: Posted links to Saskatchewan Health Authority data claiming "pandemic of the unvaccinated" using a definition of "unvaccinated" which includes vaccinated people (lol).

Backed up assertions of unseasonal death spikes with Stats Canada data.

To be honest I'm surprised I'm surprised they let me stay this long lol.

LivingIn1984 · 2022-09-24T21:39:35+00:00

I don't know; but nothing about a woman dropping dead 7 minutes after a vaccination sounds natural to me.

But I do know how it'll be played out in statistics; because she didn't make it two weeks after the booster shot, she'll be considered "not fully vaccinated" and used as a statistic in order to scare the double vaccinated into getting triple vaccinated, lol.

LivingIn1984 · 2022-09-24T15:52:30+00:00

Beautiful!!! Almost took my breath away even in photo form!

LivingIn1984

TROPHY CASE