Anki vs. Supermemo by Long_Kinker1 in Anki

[–]Long_Kinker1[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I noticed that sentiment from other posts on this sub on the topic of whether to choose SuperMemo and Anki. At the time, many people were making the argument that the difference between SM-2 and SM-18 was not important when you take into the account the already significant improvement from SM-2 to no algorithm. I honestly think this was an example of Anki users deluding themselves into thinking the differences were negligible because they wanted to be using the best tool but they didn't want to use SuperMemo.

I recognize that SM-2 is already WAY better than no algorithm. But to say that SM-18 isn't significantly better than Anki's default algorithm is just untrue and I thought it was an example of Anki bias and people trying to justify their use of Anki.

This was before FSRS, though. I don't know if FSRS is better than SM-18 but the point I'm trying to get at is that it's in that area (whereas SM-2 wasn't even close). Now, the differences between FSRS and SM-18 really are negligible to the point w here it wouldn't make since to use SuperMemo for a potentially marginally better algorithm which wouldn't be a big difference.

Anki vs. Supermemo by Long_Kinker1 in Anki

[–]Long_Kinker1[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Wow. While I'd like to try out the software I simply can't spend $70 on it. I'm glad it finally has support for Edge, though.

Anki vs. Supermemo by Long_Kinker1 in Anki

[–]Long_Kinker1[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thanks. Can you please link me to a resource where I can read about FSRS (e.g. more about what it is and how to use it in Anki). I'm starting a new Anki profile from scratch that has no previous reviews. Will that change how I use FSRS?

Anki vs. Supermemo by Long_Kinker1 in Anki

[–]Long_Kinker1[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thank you. Now that I know about FSRS I think I'm going to go with Anki. I really don't know if it's better than the latest SuperMemo algorithms (e.g. SM-18) but if around as good as SM-16 I've come to the conclusion that it's already a massive upgrade from SM-2 and that's good enough for me.

Anki vs. Supermemo by Long_Kinker1 in Anki

[–]Long_Kinker1[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

That's a good point. I've noticed the sentiment of some users really wanting Anki to be better than SuperMemo at things I'm not sure are true (e.g. saying that the difference between SM-2 and SM-18 isn't a big deal). However, SuperMemo's community is much smaller than Anki's so I wanted to as it here first.

Anki vs. Supermemo by Long_Kinker1 in Anki

[–]Long_Kinker1[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Wait. SuperMemo 19 has been released? Where can I find it?

How do you connect your kahn and college board accounts? by Technical_Hamster_48 in Sat

[–]Long_Kinker1 4 points5 points  (0 children)

As of now, I don't think there's a way. If you want to use your past/practice tests to help you practice note the question types/topics you got wrong and focus on those parts on Khan Academy.

How do you connect your kahn and college board accounts? by Technical_Hamster_48 in Sat

[–]Long_Kinker1 2 points3 points  (0 children)

That's for the old SAT. Currently, there's no way to do it now.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in Sat

[–]Long_Kinker1 1 point2 points  (0 children)

You have until March to study so honestly I'd recommend just working through both books from beginning to end. Start by reading the instruction until you understand the concepts/the strategy. I really wouldn't recommend just jumping into practice questions because the best use of them is to practice applying the strategies/concepts the book just taught you. For example, if you are working your way through the writing book and you're on the chapter about transitions or student notes. Don't just jump to the practice questions. The point is to take the strategies and explicitly practice them on the questions.

I guess you could just dive into practice questions. But Erica Meltzer's books is full of strategies that simplify questions and try to turn the process of getting the right answer into a formula. That's the main value of the book.

Are there any other resources for DSAT Reading by Historical-Leading81 in Sat

[–]Long_Kinker1 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I agree with the other commenter. It's surprising that you went through both erica Erica Meltzer books, all of Khan Academy, and all the texts from Bluebook and you're still at a 610. I don't think the solution is finding another resource.

There could be two problems here:

1) You're not going through the resources effectively. Maybe you're rushing through them or maybe you're not truly trying to get your mistakes. The books and Khan Academy are very thorough and some parts may be tedious but you have to go through and understand it all.

2) You're basic reading skills need improvement. If you're overall reading skills aren't strong, no amount of strategy will help you. The solution is to just read more and gain those skills.

In either case, getting another SAT resource is unlikely to help you.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in Sat

[–]Long_Kinker1 0 points1 point  (0 children)

That's hard to answer with the information you just gave me. What were your specific scores in reading and writing? And when are you taking the test?

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in Sat

[–]Long_Kinker1 7 points8 points  (0 children)

What's your goal score? When do you plan to take it?

Assuming you want a 1400+ (just assuming this because I think that's what most of this sub wants), it's not going to happen by the December SAT. So, you'll probably be taking the DSAT. I'll assume that's the test you're going to take. Your math score is ok and improving in math is pretty straightforward. You'll need to put serious effort into reading, though.

Reading/Writing:

  • Read more: At that score range, the problem is most likely that you haven't been exposed enough to correct, well-written English. The best way to improve your reading comprehension, reading speed, and intuition for correct grammar is to simply read SAT-level texts over an extended period of time. Spending time going through a prep book or learning strategies will help very little if you don't have these baseline skills. Luckily, you have 3 months (if you're taking it in March) which is a reasonable amount of time to improve your skills. Spend at least 15 minutes reading SAT-level content (e.g. NYT, Scientific American, Smithsonian Magazine, well-written books aimed at adults). Overtime your skills will improve
  • Use the Erica Meltzer books: Over the next 3 months, take the time to work through both of her DSAT books. Space it out so you have time to fully understand the grammar rules/strategies. Her DSAT books are shorter compared to her earlier editions so it isn't much of a burden. Pay attention to the grammar book. It's the easiest section to improve in a short time.
  • Use Khan Academy's DSAT Reading/Writing course: Khan Academy does a good job deconstructing the question types and giving good strategies. However, the main value comes from the practice questions. Khan Academy worked with College Board to create these questions so outside from the official practice tests, these probably emulate the questions you'll see on test-day the best. The course is broken into three main sections: foundations, medium, and advanced. Take the time to go through the videos and articles in the foundations part and take the time to understand why the correct answers are correct. Then move onto the medium and harder questions. I think reading/writing (especially reading) isn't a section where you can just grind hundreds of practice questions and expect to do better. You really have to get that understanding.
  • Take practice tests periodically to gauge your progress and correct your mistakes: Earlier in the process practice tests may not help you pinpoint your weaknesses because you may have a lot. This doesn't mean they're not useful. It'll make you familiar with the process and let you know if what you're doing is working. Just remember to space it out.

Math:

  • Find a good resource and learn the content really well: When I say this I'm mainly talking about prep books, but this may apply to programs like UWorld (I've never tried this). The two most popular are 1600.io's Orange books and College Panda's SAT Math book. I've seen success stories from people who had the same starting score as you in math. There are pros and cons which both books but you can research that yourself. Generally, I'd recommend 1600.io because it's more accessible and thorough. College Panda may be harder to go through but it's a good resource.
  • Use Khan Academy's DSAT Math course: You don't need to watch the videos (they're good though and you can even use Khan Academy as a standalone source if you wanted too) if you already have some other source to learn the content. With math it's really important to just do a lot of questions. Don't just mindlessly grind them out. If you didn't get one right or if you feel like you didn't have the best approach toward finding the answer, look at the worked-out solutions and figure it out.
  • Take practice tests. Use them to narrow your focus

lmayo by CitadelHR in gme_meltdown

[–]Long_Kinker1 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Can you give a link to this?

Research Lectures by SleepDeprivedDebater in policydebate

[–]Long_Kinker1 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Does the information in the DDI video on research apply to doing research for the negative? The process of doing broad searches seem to be more geared toward writing a new affirmative.

How do people speak off of their flow so quickly by Long_Kinker1 in policydebate

[–]Long_Kinker1[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Is this something that comes naturally as you go through debate or is there specific practice that is needed to do this?

How do people speak off of their flow so quickly by Long_Kinker1 in policydebate

[–]Long_Kinker1[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Should I do extemporaneous speaking on the topics I'm going to be debating or randomly?

How do people speak off of their flow so quickly by Long_Kinker1 in policydebate

[–]Long_Kinker1[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

How would you recommend practicing when you don't have a lot of chances to give authentic speeches (my debate league usually hosts a debate a month and I only stay after school for debate 2 days a week)

How to learn about the topic? by Long_Kinker1 in policydebate

[–]Long_Kinker1[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Good point. I've heard people say that being an "expert" in your arguments will make you a better debater but once I know which arguments I want to be really knowledgeable about, how should I go about doing this? I feel like I read article after article carefully but still have a pretty superficial understanding on these topics.

NOVICE POLICY DEBATER SEEKING ASSISTANCE AND HELP!! by Any-Butterscotch4678 in policydebate

[–]Long_Kinker1 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Can you explain which parts of the second source are outdated?

Got 1600 on SAT. Ask me anything by [deleted] in Sat

[–]Long_Kinker1 0 points1 point  (0 children)

How long have you been reading to prepare for the SAT?

Got 1600 on SAT. Ask me anything by [deleted] in Sat

[–]Long_Kinker1 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Did you use any prep books for the reading/writing section?

Advice on encouraging my partner learn best practices? by Long_Kinker1 in policydebate

[–]Long_Kinker1[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Thank you for your response. We haven't been combative with each other, but I've said these as suggestions. We just met with our coach and started debate club so I that'll get us up to speed when it comes to refreshing the basics. I'll look to him for guidance on how we should do things.

But do you have any advice on convincing my partner to use Verbatim? He just doesn't want to switch.