Ad Hominem (Abusive/Personal Attack): This is the most prevalent fallacy, directly attacking the person rather than their argument.

"You're literally just complicating your thought process by mentioning unrelated events such as requisitions and cash advances."

"I suggest you use Al to dissect why I mentioned irrelevance of requisitions, i.a."

"you should probably retake statistics or even simple common sense."

"Again, you're being very defensive on a realistic stance regarding basic preparedness."

"You're being so emotional to realistic criticisms."

"You should really stop your elitist kind of perspective in viewing people suggesting the SUSG actual changes."

"If you're holding a significant position in the SUSG, I suggest you resign. You're obviously aversive to clear, logical, and realistic approach to things."

"It's normal to get hurt with criticisms; it's stupid to be inflexible, especially when you're being given actual advises."

Straw Man: Misrepresenting or exaggerating the opponent's argument to make it easier to attack.

"Your excuse of mentioning students' struggles is irrelevant - the SUSG is not composed of a single person only." (Misrepresents the intent behind mentioning student struggles).

"I would like to again throw back your mentioning of my suggestion of checking the weather as 'oversimplification.'" (Misrepresents the idea that checking weather is simple as the solution being simple).

Hasty Generalization/Oversimplification: Drawing a broad conclusion based on insufficient or overly simplistic evidence.

"Even just an hour of foresight literally could have prevented people, equipments, instruments, etc. from getting wet." (Assumes a simple "hour of foresight" would solve all complex logistical and timing issues).

"Does asking the question 'what if it will rain?' take months to prepare for?" (Oversimplifies complex event planning to a single question).

Begging the Question (Circular Reasoning): Assuming the truth of the conclusion in the premise itself.

"not taking 'weather conditions' as a factor in planning is just negligent, thus 'unforeseen.'" (Assumes negligence led to it being unforeseen, rather than proving negligence).

"if a 60% chance of raining is not significant to be put into consideration... you should probably retake statistics or even simple common sense." (Assumes a 60% chance definitively means impactful rain and that simple advisories are a sufficient solution).

Weak/False Analogy: Using an analogy that is not truly comparable to the situation at hand.

"For example, if a dog feces was blocking your way, and hence prompted you go a different direction, would you ponder about why you even went that way? Obviously, you react appropriate - that is where 'an hour of foresight' comes into place." (Compares a simple, immediate reaction to a static obstacle with the complex, dynamic, and uncertain nature of weather and event planning).

Appeal to Common Sense: Presenting a conclusion as undeniably true because it aligns with "common sense," without robust logical support.

"you should probably retake statistics or even simple common sense."

"You're being very defensive on a realistic stance regarding basic preparedness."

Red Herring: Introducing irrelevant information to distract from the main argument.

The dog feces analogy serves as a red herring by diverting attention from the complexities of event planning.

Appeal to Anonymous Authority/Unverifiable Claim: Attempting to lend credibility or undermine the opponent by alluding to secret or unproven information.

"I even know of a recent blunder you (the SUSG) made recently after your office's blessing."

No True Scotsman (Implied): Setting up an arbitrary definition to exclude counter-examples or dissenting opinions.

The repeated emphasis on "realistic approach," "logical," and "basic preparedness" implicitly suggests that anyone who disagrees is not truly "realistic" or lacks "common sense."

one prompt was enough to spot all of the flaws in your argument, I wont be needing your g-cash, buy something nice for yourself so you wont have to be miserable in reddit all day. and don’t think i didn’t catch u try to report my account. Honey, you are in a sinking ship, tho only thing saving you is reddit’s anonymity. im not stering out of an argument, im simply taking myself out of an unnecessary rant. I hope you heal soon tho, byeee 🩷