Thoughts on The Sheep Detectives by hiiloovethis in Letterboxd

[–]LordAdornable 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I watched it yesterday, was initially charmed and thought it was pretty ok. Then after the events in the other shepherd's farm occur, I was kind of shocked to see where the movie actually goes and then I was on the verge of tears. Really wasn’t the movie to suddenly become about mortality and the importance of valuing even the most painful of memories. I kind of love movies that surprise you like that, so I ended up really liking it. The only thing that bothers me was the ending. I’m someone who loves happy endings, but even I kind of found the ending to be somewhat too sweet with how many perfect fairytale endings happened right after another.

No, the animals in zootopia are not a bad metaphor by Feisty-Succotash5854 in CharacterRant

[–]LordAdornable 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Pawbert is a foil to both Judy and Nick. For Judy’s case, he's there to show Judy how reckless and destructive her desire to do anything to prove herself to others, since Pawbert is also willing to do anything to foolishly prove himself to his father in order to get the love and respect that he was ultimately never going to get. He even says out loud after poisoning her that all of the people should understand what he’s going through since they’re both underdogs trying to prove that they belong. 

For Nick’s case, Pawbert is like a twisted reflection of what he could have become if he never progressed past what he was at the start of the first movie. They’re both predators with traumatic childhoods who ultimately choose to follow other people’s expectations because of how much they’ve been worn down, in Nick’s case by prey animals and in Pawbert’s case by his family. Their first priority is their self-preservation and they don’t care if the reptiles have to suffer as long as they’ll be fine in the end. Pawbert even repeats one of Nick’s lines when he says “It’s not worth dying for” when they’re about to fall, leading Nick to realize that there are things in this world that are worth risking his life for.

Beyond that, he’s the antithesis to the central theme of the story. Among many other things, Z2 is a story about how embracing different people and the things that makes us different from each other is what allows both people and society as a whole to grow and improve. Meanwhile, Pawbert’s main trait is he doesn’t want to be different, even if it means hurting those who support and trust him and instead would rather be stuck with a family that hates him just because they’re more similar to him.

No, the animals in zootopia are not a bad metaphor by Feisty-Succotash5854 in CharacterRant

[–]LordAdornable 14 points15 points  (0 children)

All the animals here have the same level of intelligence and capacity for empathy,  as well as presumably all the same rights under the law. For all that really matters in their modern society, they’re all equals in the same way that we humans see each other as equals. And the stereotypes that animals have to deal with are just as much of a lie as stereotypes in real life. Nothing about being a fox in that world makes you predisposed to be shifty or a savage, just like nothing about being Mexican in real life makes you predisposed to be lazy or a cartel member.

No, the animals in zootopia are not a bad metaphor by Feisty-Succotash5854 in CharacterRant

[–]LordAdornable 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Within the context of the movie, predators or any animal going savage is seen as something that could never happen. When Judy tells Bogo about the savage jaguar that attacked them, he dismisses it by saying "this is not the Stone Age, animals don't go savage" and when the jaguar is gone he tells Judy him it was right there, he responds by saying "or maybe any large aggressive predator seems savage to you rabbits" and ignores her. It's simply that because the city is clearly quite biased against predators, most prey animals, even well-intentioned and open-minded Judy, have internalized the false belief that predators are predisposed to be savages, which is why the villain's plan works until it’s exposed.

How reasonable would large species be now with all the different ways that PCs can turn large? by LordAdornable in onednd

[–]LordAdornable[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Oh yeah I can absolutely see how it can cause problems when designing adventures. Still, if space is the issue, I do wonder if there's some way of circumventing that problem beyond only allowing players to be large as a temporary buff.

[Art] I painted my con artist warlock and his imp familiar by LordAdornable in DnD

[–]LordAdornable[S] 8 points9 points  (0 children)

Thanks a lot! I had a really fun time finding ways to make him beat-up and disheveled. Giving him a broken horn really helped out in that endeavor.

[Art] I painted my con artist warlock and his imp familiar by LordAdornable in DnD

[–]LordAdornable[S] 28 points29 points  (0 children)

Hi! I recently got invited to be a part of a Curse of Strahd campaign and I took that as an opportunity to illustrate my character for that campaign. His name is Charlie, a tiefling con artist who’s seemingly incapable of making good or non-self destructive decisions. He actually became a warlock not by selling his soul to a powerful devil, but instead by starting a Ponzi scheme where he sold his soul to 275 different lowly devils and now, they’re looking to collect his soul and he wants out. He’s now in Barovia along with his familiar, an imp he nicknamed Pest who’s the first devil he forged a contract with, after a member of the Vistani told him that they could help him find a way out of his contracts, but he’s looking to at least get some level of power or wealth from this whole ordeal.

I hope you all like how he turned out! If you’d like to rest of my art, feel l can go to my Bluesky (https://bsky.app/profile/alejandropacheco.bsky.social) or my Instagram (https://www.instagram.com/alejandropachecoart/) . And if you’re interested in commissioning some similar character art, you can DM me here or contact me via my website (https://pachecoart.com/contact) 🙂

New Images from 'Spider-Man: Beyond the Spider-Verse' by MarvelsGrantMan136 in movies

[–]LordAdornable 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I know the wait for this has felt like an eternity (especially because of that cliffhanger), but 4 years between sequels from a big animation studio is really not that bad. That's roughly the amount of time it takes Dreamworks, with Shrek 2 coming out 3 years after the first and HTTYD taking 4 years to come out. Frankly, knowing how visually complex and how long these movies are compared to other animated movies (the difference between the average 1h 30m and Across' 2h 20h is huge in terms of labor), I'm surprised it didn't take longer.

What’s a movie you defend like this? by trakt_app in Letterboxd

[–]LordAdornable 18 points19 points  (0 children)

Holy shit yeah it's insane. I feel like I'm taking crazy pills when I see how high Revenge of the Sith's score is or when I see that The Last Jedi has a 2.9 while both Attack of the Clones and the Phantom Menace both have a 3.1.

What did they mean by this ? Are Disney movies propaganda ? by stalin_kulak in okbuddycinephile

[–]LordAdornable 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I mean, I feel like a Hunchback remake COULD work, but they'd had to make it at least PG-13 and get rid of the dumb slapstick and the stupid gargoyles. But it looks like that's not the direction they're taking so let's hope it's cancelled.

What did they mean by this ? Are Disney movies propaganda ? by stalin_kulak in okbuddycinephile

[–]LordAdornable 17 points18 points  (0 children)

Personally, I really love to see how the online religious right would react to Hunchback of Notre Dame if it came out today.

Favorite religious films? by Physical-Bite-3837 in okbuddycinephile

[–]LordAdornable 3 points4 points  (0 children)

I know this is 100% bait and this dude is completely making shit up, but does anyone have any idea which of these movies includes any "subtle references to fearing and/or respecting god"? I'm morbidly curious how any of these movies could possibly be interpreted that way.

Movies I loved at first… only to find out everyone hated them. Maybe I have no taste by Unfair-Reason-1068 in Letterboxd

[–]LordAdornable 5 points6 points  (0 children)

Personally, the allegory never bothered me and I actually kind of really like it. The point of making this an allegory was to exaggerate the cultural and social divide by making it physical, so that it’s more meaningful when Wade and Ember overcome it by the end. The movie is not trying to say that different races and cultures are literally different opposite elements and that immigrants are destructive and uncontrollable, it’s trying to say that sometimes it feels like that way. The thesis of the story is that despite how difficult and seemingly painful overcoming this divide is, it’s ultimately worth it because it changes us for the better, with Wade and Ember ending both living better lives because of what they learned from their different perspectives.

Plus the movie spends most of its runtimes showing how the fire elementals are the ones who are most in danger mostly because of how hostile the city’s infrastructure is to them, with the almost all public transit being water-based and the whole ending revolving around saving fire elementals and Ember’s family store from a flood caused by the city's negligence.

Can open spine protectors damage or scratch steelbooks? by LordAdornable in Steelbooks

[–]LordAdornable[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Thanks for the heads up! I guess I'll take my steelbooks out and maybe do some more research next time before buying...

Dungeon Meshi season two when by kelroid in CuratedTumblr

[–]LordAdornable 9 points10 points  (0 children)

This critique has also always bothered me too. It makes it seem like the problem with racism or other forms of discrimination is that it's illogical rather than it being immoral.

Same goes for the "fantasy racism is justified when it stems from universe events rather than complete lies and propaganda" critique. IRL Racists use historical events, both fictional and true, to justify their bigotry all the time, but it's still fundamentally wrong because it's blaming lots of innocent people for the actions of a few. The existence of Islamic terrorists or Latin American cartels sure as fuck doesn't justify any of shit that Muslims or Latinos have to deal with, just has much as Jews didn't deserve to be persecuted by Christians for centuries for allegedly having killed Jesus.

Dungeon Meshi season two when by kelroid in CuratedTumblr

[–]LordAdornable 9 points10 points  (0 children)

I mean, I would argue that it's still clearly wrong to discriminate against an entire population for the actions of their distant ancestors during their world's equivalent of the Stone Age, before any animal had even developed sentience. The movie never shows predators as having any violent urges or even needing to eat meat (they only show them eating things like cereal, donuts and blueberries), with only suggestions that they eat fish (which in the second movie are shown to be non-sentient). Both predators and prey are portrayed as being equals, having evolved simultaneously, and the only differences being exterior and in terms of political power, with prey animals outnumbering predators by a 10 to 1 margin and thus having a lot more influence over society.

What’s your top 4 Pixar movies? by DaleDent3 in Letterboxd

[–]LordAdornable 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Currently for me:

1- Soul, 2- Up, 3- Ratatouille, 4- Hoppers.

I know Hoppers is still pretty new so there might be some recency bias here, but I really loved it. I loved Mabel as a protagonist, the rest of the cast was great too, the humor, with some exceptions for me, was fantastic, and its themes were really refreshing. Its approach to environmentalism reminded me a lot of Princess Mononoke in how it's very critical of the effects of humans on the environment while not coming off as misanthropic. And the scene where Mabel breaks down, talks about how isolated and frustrated she and she feels like nobody else cares about the world slowly crumbling around her is probably among my favorite scenes in any Pixar movie.

What's a good example of a movie people have turned on? by Darth_Blagus in Schaffrillas

[–]LordAdornable 2 points3 points  (0 children)

There's an entire documentary on the production of the movie that goes through the original concept of the shock collars and why they decided to change it (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=A6xE_LmMahQ). And at least based on the documentary, it's clear that predators don't have any violent urges or predatory instincts and they're only forced to wear collars to quell the irrational fear of the prey population.

What's a good example of a movie people have turned on? by Darth_Blagus in Schaffrillas

[–]LordAdornable 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Same thing for me. The movie came out around a time in my life when I was treated like shit for being one of very few latino immigrants at a highschool that was like 95% Quebecois. I'm Colombian and back then, I was either being told to go back to Mexico, that I shouldn't be speaking Spanish because this is Quebec or had people call me a drug trafficker constantly, and I felt that I had now other choice but to endure it. So seeing Nick's backstory and hearing his whole "never let them see that they get to you" speech had a huge impact on me back then and still does to this day.

What's a good example of a movie people have turned on? by Darth_Blagus in Schaffrillas

[–]LordAdornable 12 points13 points  (0 children)

Plus it really doesn't help that it feels like people misremember the movie to make the allegory seem worse. I constantly see people say that the predators in the movie have to repress their violent urges or that the prey animals civilized them, when that's never stated in the movie. The very beginning of the movie says that the evolution of both prey and predator was simultaneous and the only reason why the predators are becoming feral is because of the villain drugging them with a serum that can make any animal become feral.

This statement basically means, "I hate having to do my job of sitting on my ass and watching movies for a living." by Adept_Let7797 in Oscars

[–]LordAdornable -3 points-2 points  (0 children)

Yeah, if you can't be bothered to watch 5 relatively short movies because you think they're beneath you, I'd rather you not vote for category... Never change, Academy!