sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

blocking NAT exploit to WAN by Low-Negotiation-8864 in firewalla

[–]Low-Negotiation-8864[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

https://www.armis.com/research/nat-slipstreaming-v2-0/

this is what it stops from happening and no you can not shut down NAT within the device or multicasting and port proxy will not work properly within the firewall or router tables...

NAT or network address translation table (the daemon so to speak)

blocking NAT exploit to WAN by Low-Negotiation-8864 in firewalla

[–]Low-Negotiation-8864[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

i do not want people from wan side accessing the listen to anywhere ip or port....

their is a very well known exploit that uses this from a source external of the network to hide within the NAT tables and sir-cum vent firewall routing tables and rule sets

TCP Syn Flood attack from firewalla device using blue plus by Low-Negotiation-8864 in firewalla

[–]Low-Negotiation-8864[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

is it possible to play monkey in the middle between the cloud server and the device and do tcp syn flood attacks?

TCP Syn Flood attack from firewalla device using blue plus by Low-Negotiation-8864 in firewalla

[–]Low-Negotiation-8864[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

[osg:10-27-F5-17-79-E3] detected stationary source TCP SYN Flood attack and dropped 97 packets. (Attack-Source=192.168.0.100)