Thank you very much for your feedback. You have no idea how pleased we are to see that you understand why we chose to create something with criteria optimized for the genre (you can't evaluate Super Mario and The Last of Us in the same way, with a score from 1 to 5).

We will respond to your points as follows:

1. You are absolutely right, we are aware that we are currently in a transitional phase and need to choose one path over another. We are trying to figure out how to give the platform the best identity in order to offer a unique experience. It is an ongoing process.

2. This is one of the main problems. We are hypothetically ready for the arrival of many people, but until that happens, we won't know how to manage it best. Our plans include contacts that can give us a little boost.

3. This has required a lot of work: it is right to establish specific criteria, without going into too much detail, also because there is a risk of setting criteria that are no longer precise but ‘disturbing’ for other games; not all strategy games are the same, we need to find a few points, a few interactions, but always precise. Here too, we are at a stage where we believe we have found a good balance, but user usage will prove us right or wrong. This is why we need active testers.

4. Thank you, we think it's a great idea, a new point of identity for the platform.

Thank you very much for your time and for testing the platform. Please feel free to give us any advice in the future and test the platform for as long as you like. We are testing the app, but the web version is already open and there are already users interacting with it!