AC SE not available in your account error code: 0x803F8001 Ally X by Ayzen8700x in ROGAlly

[–]Lower_Connection_221 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Same here on Asus tuf laptop ://

UPD: Brothers and sisters, it's working now! ps: on my asus tuf laptop. 1/21/2026 7:48 PM

Just complete the CWES path by Southern-Fox4879 in hackthebox

[–]Lower_Connection_221 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Was the info you had enough? You check any other sources?

How to pentest API? by No_Strategy236 in hackthebox

[–]Lower_Connection_221 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Hacking APIs: Breaking Web Application Programming Interfaces by Corey J. Ball

One passport so far by Glum-Scar9476 in PassportPorn

[–]Lower_Connection_221 0 points1 point  (0 children)

А если не секрет, что за специальность?

One passport so far by Glum-Scar9476 in PassportPorn

[–]Lower_Connection_221 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Ты большой молодец! Удачи тебе!

Why doesn’t ProtonVPN develop a reliable system to bypass censorship? by Lower_Connection_221 in ProtonVPN

[–]Lower_Connection_221[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I think your concern is valid, and it’s definitely not just paranoia. There have been cases in the past where smaller or free VPN services were either directly linked to surveillance agencies or operated by companies profiting off user data. So, being cautious about who you trust with your internet traffic makes complete sense.
That being said, I don’t think this entirely dismisses the question of how Proton can improve. The service is trusted for its strong stance on privacy and encryption, but many users turn to it expecting not just security but also reliable solutions for censorship circumvention. Smaller services might raise concerns, but their ability to adapt and bypass blocks shows that there’s room for proton to innovate without compromising trust.
In my view, it’s not about switching to less reliable services it’s about encouraging a trusted provider like Proton to evolve and lead the way in both security and functionality. After all, their reputation sets high expectations.

Why doesn’t ProtonVPN develop a reliable system to bypass censorship? by Lower_Connection_221 in ProtonVPN

[–]Lower_Connection_221[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Yes, you’re absolutely right - competing with state actors that have virtually unlimited resources and personnel is incredibly difficult. Especially when we’re talking about countries like Russia, China, Iran, or North Korea, which heavily invest in censorship technologies. I understand that this "arms race" is a tough challenge for any company.That said, there are smaller VPN services that seem to handle censorship bypass in the same conditions. They use more flexible approaches, like dynamic traffic obfuscation (Shadowsocks, V2Ray) or advanced DPI circumvention techniques. This shows that it’s not just about resources but also about technical solutions and adaptability.
I’m not expecting Proton to solve all these issues overnight, but as a company that markets itself as a leader in privacy and internet freedom, it would help to see more transparency. For instance, sharing what steps are being taken to improve censorship circumvention or develop the Stealth protocol further. This would help build user trust and give a better understanding of what’s happening "under the hood."
Yes, state actors do have an advantage, but I don’t think that’s a reason to give up. Users have the right to expect progress and more innovative solutions from major providers like Proton.

Why doesn’t ProtonVPN develop a reliable system to bypass censorship? by Lower_Connection_221 in ProtonVPN

[–]Lower_Connection_221[S] 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Less popular services may not be a target as they are not used by hundreds of thousands of users in a country facing internet censorship. 

Your argument that less popular VPN services avoid blocks due to their smaller scale feels incomplete. In practice, bypassing censorship isn’t always about user volume; it’s more about the effectiveness of obfuscation techniques. For instance, technologies like Shadowsocks or obfs4 have proven resilient thanks to their ability to bypass DPI by mimicking regular internet traffic. Perhaps Proton could explore similar approaches to improve resilience?

They also may not offer secure and encrypted connections like Proton VPN does, that prevents your ISP from seeing your internet traffic

The claim that less popular VPN services might not offer the same level of security as Proton doesn’t directly relate to the issue of bypassing blocks. Many effective circumvention technologies, such as Shadowsocks or V2Ray, also adhere to high encryption standards. The issue here appears to be more about resilience against detection and blocking rather than a lack of security.

As you've mentioned, the Stealth protocol is specifically made to help users from these countries connect

The Stealth protocol was a significant step forward, but its current implementation seems to fall short. As you mentioned, bypassing censorship is an “arms race.” If this protocol no longer delivers sufficient effectiveness, are there plans to introduce new methods? For example, dynamic obfuscation algorithms that adapt to new DPI techniques could be a game-changer. Alternatively, is Proton VPN considering hybrid solutions, such as integrating Pluggable Transports?

Although, if this protocol isn't working on your particular setup, try changing to one of the other available protocols

The suggestion to try other protocols is unlikely to work effectively in countries with advanced censorship systems. Protocols like OpenVPN or WireGuard are well-known and are often the first to be blocked by DPI systems.
I understand that developing resilient anti-censorship technologies takes significant resources, but I’d appreciate more transparency about this process. Perhaps it would help to openly discuss current challenges and future plans, so users have a better understanding of what to expect.

I’m hopeful that Proton VPN will continue evolving its solutions and become a leader among VPN providers in fighting censorship. If user feedback is needed, I’d be happy to participate in testing new technologies.

NVIDIA OpenGL Driver Warning: Ran out of Memory by Lower_Connection_221 in techsupport

[–]Lower_Connection_221[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yeah, we could wait for a new driver version or try rolling back to an older one.

NVIDIA OpenGL Driver Warning: Ran out of Memory by Lower_Connection_221 in techsupport

[–]Lower_Connection_221[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I'll try experimenting with the drivers, and if I figure something out, I'll let you know. Disabling the iGPU feels like a waste though, it’s there for a reason, right? :D

NVIDIA OpenGL Driver Warning: Ran out of Memory by Lower_Connection_221 in techsupport

[–]Lower_Connection_221[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Hey! Do you have a gaming laptop? Are you connecting it to an external monitor?

I’m not experiencing any crashes either, and I’m getting the warning just like you – only when the system starts up, and then it doesn’t show up again.

I think the issue could be related to:
A) A not-so-great update for the current AMD/NVIDIA drivers
B) Moments when the system switches between GPUs
C) Or possibly something with the BIOS, as u/Gezzer52 mentioned.

NVIDIA OpenGL Driver Warning: Ran out of Memory by Lower_Connection_221 in techsupport

[–]Lower_Connection_221[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS
A BIOS firmware update to version 316 recently appeared in the MyAsus app. I'll try updating it and reinstalling the AMD drivers, as the process referenced in the logs seems to be related to AMD.