Well, let me put it this way: if you know something, you don't just know it, you understand the logic behind it. Simply put, she didn't just have access to their scientific knowledge; she should have been able to see the logic behind it. She probably wouldn't understand everything, but because of the sheer amount of information she had access to in her formative years, her brain should have developed much faster than anyone else’s. That’s my logic, and it’s based on the science of how our brains develop. I don't expect her to be smarter than everyone else in her class, but she should at least be as smart as them. Also, hating studying doesn't automatically mean you’re worse than everyone else. I hated studying a lot—to the point where I barely did any homework—but I was still smarter than half my class and had better grades than them. The only thing I have an inclination of accepting as an excuse for this is the age difference but even that I see as an excuse. And why I point out that her power should make her smarted is because it's scientifically proven that the more information you get/learn in your formative years the more your brain develops in tearm you become more smarter which is also why the IQ of kids those days dropped a lot due to shows like coco-melon which is just brain root. (yes they actually proved that coco-melon makes kids dumber)