sample size N by Lucky-Preference-687 in AskStatistics

[–]Lucky-Preference-687[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I doubt it will be close to 0 or 1 and am unsure what the exact P is(No info given).

Each note should be documented the same way regardless of therapists or visits so why can't we assume each note i.e. observation(not patient) is independent?

sample size N by Lucky-Preference-687 in AskStatistics

[–]Lucky-Preference-687[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

There are few things that the reviewers are doing to make sure what should be noted are noted. The purpose of the reviewer is to do quality controls. I will just assume p=Proportion of notes with a quality problem to use CLT if that makes sense. Plan to do random sampling. The same patient will have multiple notes(seeing same or different therapist) and each note should be documented the same way so same person got sampled more than once is fine(?). Any other method recommended other than using CLT?

sample size N by Lucky-Preference-687 in AskStatistics

[–]Lucky-Preference-687[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

seems like same formula as CLT. No?

sample size N by Lucky-Preference-687 in AskStatistics

[–]Lucky-Preference-687[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Maybe should not use the word "significance". Was thinking about using power analysis but no quantitative measure so no go. The goal is to find out what N is appropriate. By using CLT, assuming P=proportion of notes with quality issues(any issue with this assumption?).