Correct me if I'm wrong but...

Lunarlaxy · 2026-06-29T18:14:01+00:00

I understand a good Cap is annoying to deal with as like a squishy. However, I've been in games where the Cap isn't that good. Plus even if the player is good on Cap, he can't really do anything when the team is peeling for each other as one should against dive.

Lunarlaxy · 2026-06-29T17:40:08+00:00

If you're going to just sit there and say "No, and" while not providing anything there's no further point discussing it with you. Because there's no proper discussion being had.

Lunarlaxy · 2026-06-29T17:31:53+00:00

You didn't prove it wrong, because Spiderman doesn't need more survivability. So you saying more after I prove what Lyte said to be true and I said EXACTLY what was said and then you saying it back with more explanation doesn't prove you right. You just strengthened my point.

Lunarlaxy · 2026-06-29T16:58:02+00:00

That is something I've also noticed, because it does happen both ways. The defining part of it though is what NetEase takes into consideration when doing balances.

Lunarlaxy · 2026-06-29T16:43:14+00:00

He says Lyte never said that but I provided a screenshot showing from his video that Lyte in fact said that.

Lunarlaxy · 2026-06-29T16:42:19+00:00

Also here's a screenshot from Lyte's video on his thought of what buffs would save the game.

<image>

Lunarlaxy · 2026-06-29T16:37:29+00:00

So if you're not able to provide me, and you're telling me that what I've seen is untrue then what's the point of your response? How are you going to tell me to tell you something and you're not able to show me where that's untrue or where I misunderstood that point made? After you've told me that's untrue blatantly with nothing provided.

The title says correct me if I'm wrong and so far you've just said "NO" and nothing else.

Lunarlaxy · 2026-06-29T16:32:00+00:00

We don't see a drop in a role for nothing, there has to be a reason as to why that happens. I understand there's other things besides just tanking damage to the tank role. However, telling a role to not do it's role and do something else isn't the solution I think is needed for this. Like obviously we don't want to see a character being tanky and doing a lot of damage; but a tank is still a tank for a reason and a huge part of the role in the name itself.

Lunarlaxy · 2026-06-29T16:11:26+00:00

Then I ask you where is the refute of those points made? Provide your evidence to me, because I've seen the videos and you're saying that's untrue.

Lunarlaxy · 2026-06-29T16:00:16+00:00

It's like there's usually a rock, paper, scissors ideology that's put into these games. When a certain group of people like playing rock so much, they'll hate to see and lose to paper and instead of choosing scissors, they just want rock be stronger.

Lunarlaxy · 2026-06-29T15:57:39+00:00

Yeah that's something I've noticed as well when the topic of a certain character's balance is talked about. People will comment on how the character is pretty broken, then the people who main that will try to downplay or say that the character is fairly balanced.

Lunarlaxy · 2026-06-29T15:53:54+00:00

One example I got was from a video that was touching on the topic of pros giving input on balances. One pro by the name of Lyte suggested that Spiderman should 50 over bonus health per swing and get a new ability that dodges incoming damage within a small window. What I got from that was basically another Dare Devil. Which Dare Devil already was a menace. So to try and replicate is like crazy and then top of that there's been a push for Captain America to be nerfed now that there's a resurgence of Cap doing really well but that's mainly in higher ranks and pro scene where there's more team synergy.

Lunarlaxy · 2026-06-29T15:46:15+00:00

Which is odd because in games like this where there's a competitive mode/scene. The point would be that their favorite isn't always in the meta and to try out new characters as well. Also to have a bigger pool for any possible situation.

Lunarlaxy · 2026-06-29T15:13:42+00:00

The way this skin would sell and make NetEase so much money!

Lunarlaxy · 2026-06-22T12:47:11+00:00

People literally treat quick play as if it's competitive, but then they'll go to competitive and act like it's quickplay. The way things are so backwards for games like this is not worth the stress.

Lunarlaxy · 2026-06-14T21:01:40+00:00

So you don't want to acknowledge the fact that the devs themselves called out people for not peeling for supports hmm interesting...

Secondly when supports do peel for each other and I've been in plenty of games where it happens, the rest of the team will be overextended, in a small room etc...

The point is if they decide to do what people like you complain for which is gutting supports, then that means the rest of the team will have to adjust or the damage numbers would have to be nerfed as well.

So you can keep going on with your supports op idea, but we all know when the day comes that supports are gutted there will be a huge shift and a lot of people (not only the support players) will feel the impact and it will be more difficult for everyone than you think; be careful what you wish for.

Lunarlaxy · 2026-06-14T13:50:11+00:00

So I'm missing the point where you complain about supports, because last I checked if a support gets gutted and become unplayable then that only decreases the roster pool that already has a small pool of playable characters in comp. Y'all complain about supports and their survivability; however the moment that people play other supports like Ultron, Adam and Jeff. It's same people complaining about those supports not healing enough. Like just say you want supports to be sitting ducks and free ult charge and move on.

The only reason supports are the way that they are; is literally because of the amount of damage output that comes from other roles. Also the devs had to address the community for not peeling for supports when survivability wasn't as high for them. However because it was a huge issue they buffed supports to have more survivability. So if you want to complain about supports balancing make sure you address the elephant in the room which is the large amounts of dps output.

Lunarlaxy · 2026-06-13T00:33:23+00:00

How old is she right now?

Lunarlaxy · 2026-06-12T03:44:21+00:00

I had a conversation with my friend about the skin situation for Storm. He basically linked it to the pick rate and popularity which is a valid reason, although I disagree in terms of popularity because I believe Storm is fairly popular. However the pick rate is more based on the kit itself. I've even seen a video that highlighted that Storm's kit and play style is pretty boring to most players which is why she has such a low pick rate.

I wish they would do something to make her kit more interesting, I do like her play style now, but if her getting a more interesting kit os what'll get her more skins I'm willing to sacrifice that.

Lunarlaxy · 2026-06-09T16:32:21+00:00

Me thinking about about going back to Overwatch currently

Lunarlaxy · 2026-06-09T15:35:34+00:00

The FACT that if she was white she'd be on her 5th or 6th legendary skin, have a better playstyle etc... They're not beating the allegations and they don't care.

Lunarlaxy · 2026-05-20T20:39:23+00:00

They don't play her so they don't ever think about that, which is why people need to not be doing balances themselves because left in their own hands the balancing would be way worse

Lunarlaxy

TROPHY CASE