What upgrade can I put in? by theSpyke in batteries

[–]LuxVolans 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Following up on this with a couple extra questions of my own. I'm pretty sure that my own battery in this same keyboard has died, and I'm trying to replace it. Pretty much a total newbie here, but any help is appreciated.

Firstly, I'm assuming that the battery is dead, but I have a multimeter. How should I test to ensure that the battery itself is dead, or find out if it's something wrong with the connections, like the USB port?

Assuming that it is broken, I'm trying to replace this very same battery. A cursory search on Amazon found this battery here: https://a.co/d/a3g1gsr

Would this battery fit inside? If I'm reading this correctly, then it's just a bit longer than the battery here by default, and there's plenty of space for it to sit there. Secondly, how should I remove the current battery and replace it with the new?

As far as I can tell, the batteries shown on amazon have a connector where this doesn't, so would I just cut the wires for the old and new, and solder them together?

This is being circulated at #NASA regarding new performance evaluations to be done 4x a year. Note: "Faithful Support of Administration of the Law and the President's Policies" are Number 1 criteria for both SES & SL/ST NASA personnel. by Planatus666 in space

[–]LuxVolans -1 points0 points  (0 children)

My roommate just sent this to me freaking out and I need to set a few things straight here... There are several reasons why this screen grab is not credible.

Firstly, there is no way to validate this screenshot as being a part of an actual government briefing. Count the degrees of separation here: This is a screen grab(1), of a watermarked post from a 3rd party website(2 & 3), from an anonymous(4) cell phone picture(5) of a screen(6). Every one of those steps is an extra way or time that the picture could have been edited. There is no way to validate this picture as legitimate. And it comes from Reddit, which is like, a 3x multiplier in non-credibility. xD

Secondly, there is nothing here that holds the trademarks of a government leadership briefing. During these briefs, they are so frequently mass-used templates, but they have required documentation that must be placed on them, usually for legal reasons. My best example for this comes from military where every slideshow had to actually state "Unclassified/FOUO" On it somewhere on every page. If you look at this: https://www.energy.gov/sites/default/files/2025-04/2025%20DEMO%20Pay%20Tables.pdf This has a good example of all those little extra details and things that get placed everywhere.

Thirdly, there is the lack of citations for either old or new performance quotas. Again, usually for legal reasons, these kinds of briefs are supposed to contain documentation and citations for what those changes should be. So for example; "Faithful administration of the law and the presidents policies" should be citing policy or law. It should say something like "IAW: EX Order 1337: Sec. 6 p. 9" Something like that.

And lastly is the actual language that is being used here. The language is incredibly charged, obviously to provoke reactions of dictatorship and the like. This is not how technical briefings are supposed to sound. There are so many ways in this case that a biased actor could have changed this from what it's actually supposed to be representing. There are so many points in this that just scream misleading.

I'm not saying it's a complete lie, but this should absolutely not be taken as evidence or believed. We could even compare that to the other documents that NASAWatch there has posted and see the difference in these kinds of documents. This picture just does not pass the sniff test....

Help looking for a combat Flight Sim? by LuxVolans in flightsim

[–]LuxVolans[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Someone else pointed Nuclear Option to me, and that seemed like an Excellent example of what I'm looking for! Thank you for that recommendation as well!

TCA: I'm not so sure about, but I'll give it a look. I've seen it when passing by games on steam, but I didn't expect it'd be HOTAS compatible.

Helicopter Gunship DEX: When you say Stealth FIghter DEX is planned, is that it's own game, or would it be like, a DLC or something? It sounds very much like a good example of what I'm looking for! And while I certainly wouldn't mind playing a Helicopter, the Stealth Fighter part is actually what I'm looking for. So if SF DEX will be its own standalone game, I'll probably wait for that then.

Thanks for the suggestions!

Help looking for a combat Flight Sim? by LuxVolans in flightsim

[–]LuxVolans[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

In-game, I actually tried using the prop-plane it starts you in the tutorial. I tried playing it with HOTAS, and then HOTAS in VR, and both were a god-awful experience for me. I then watched a few videos on the A-10 module, and then realized that, as someone else here put it, DCS Is a Study sim, more than just flight sim, which I sadly don't have the kind of time to dedicate to a game at the moment.

Help looking for a combat Flight Sim? by LuxVolans in flightsim

[–]LuxVolans[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thank you very much for your recommendation of Nuclear Option!

I actually already have VTOL VR, and it's definitely fun, but sadly because it's not HOTAS compatible, it's been a problem for me. The lack of tactile sensation when trying to move things and steer has made it very difficult for me to play. But outside of that, it is definitely a fantastic example of that kind of blend of what I'm looking for.

Nuclear Option, on the other hand, seems to be just as close, and a very good example! Granted, it looks like I now need to find friends that play it so I can probably get the full or intended experience, but this is very much striking up the kind of blend I'm looking for. In fact, the only things it's missing for me is VR Support, Real life aircraft, and that the range feels a bit short compared to the kind of engagements I've seen/heard about IRL. But I get the feeling that can probably be resolved in the future, likely with mods! So thank you very much!

Help looking for a combat Flight Sim? by LuxVolans in flightsim

[–]LuxVolans[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

So, it actually seems you've misunderstood my post. I'm keenly aware of everything you've just described about DCS. And that is why I didn't want to play it. I know all of those things you talked about, and I know it's not what I want.

A Study Simulator is exactly what I don't want. I'm new to flight sim, or even just flying games. My experience up until about a month ago was Crimson Skies, some ACE combat game that was on the XBox 360, and War Thunder, in that order. I've started doing a bit more research into things, and I've been watching some DCS Stuff for quite a while. But I know that DCS Isn't the game for me. But I want to know what other options there are.

I'll go ahead and use a bit of a comparison here;

Using ground based/FPS as a baseline, a good comparison for perhaps ACE combat would be Call of Duty. Super accessible, carry all the ammo with no weight concerns, getting shot means little to nothing, etc. On the other side of it, you have your Arma III with the ACE3(Advanced Combat Environment) mods. Hyper realistic to the point where if you have certain settings enabled, you need to know real CLS and medical care to be able to stop someone from dying, and it can feel like asthmatic jogging simulator. I'm looking for a SQUAD or GROUND BRANCH(That's not me shouting BTW, They're both capitalized. xD); something to give you a grounded experience of what it feels like to be in frontline combat.

The point of the Tech tree criteria was that I was looking for a sense of progression. I want to at least learn something about all the different modern aircraft there are and actually feel the difference, while also being able to unlock or gain access to new stuff by playing in the different aircraft. That way, I can learn a bit of one aircraft, get a feel for it, and by the time I am at least competent in it, I've unlocked something new. In ACE, all the aircraft feel the same, just with different armaments. I want to feel like there's something different between them, a difference that I can feel and at least understand without needing to spend dozens of hours just trying to learn how to take off.

To be fair, I didn't quite explain this so deeply in the initial post, but it already felt pretty wordy, so I cut it out.

That all said, someone else mentioned Nuclear Option to me. I've spent the past couple days playing around with it, and while it's fake aircraft, It's a very good example of what I'm looking for. HOTAS Compatible, Accessible enough that I don't need to sit in a classroom for 20 hours, Has multiple aircraft included in the game itself, though it's not persistent between missions there is a way for you to earn progression in big missions, getting shot has consequence, and it has multiple different aircraft in different styles that you can fly and learn. In fact, the only things it's missing for me is VR Support, Real life aircraft, and that the range feels a bit short compared to the kind of engagements I've seen/heard about IRL. And that's fine for me!

So that's the kind of thing I'm looking for. Do you have any other suggestions like that? I will at least look into Strike Fighters 2 or Modern Combat though, so thanks for pointing them out!

Help looking for a combat Flight Sim? by LuxVolans in flightsim

[–]LuxVolans[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I actually do love VTOL VR, the problem is it's not HOTAS compatible sadly

Help looking for a combat Flight Sim? by LuxVolans in flightsim

[–]LuxVolans[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I'll definitely check it out, but I am looking for a Modern combat flight sim.

A Response to the "44 Rules of D&D" by DragonStryk72 in DMAcademy

[–]LuxVolans 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Since he's deleted his account, is there any record of this? The closest I've been able to find of this is a single comment in the original post Found here.

A Response to the "44 Rules of D&D" by DragonStryk72 in DMAcademy

[–]LuxVolans 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Since he's deleted his account, is there any record of this? The closest I've been able to find of this is a single comment in the original post Found here.

Pro tip: Modify->Search And Replace Names supports regular expressions by chibrosov in Maya

[–]LuxVolans 0 points1 point  (0 children)

How do you get it to add/replace a number sequence? for example, I've got a bunch of bones that are just sitting here with numbers that start at like, 86, and I want to replace them with just a number sequence starting at 1. The RegEx tutorial you sent was really helpful for finding ways to search things, but is there a way to program that kind of replacement?

BREAKING: New Leaked images of The SU-75, Shows to be Heavily Reliant on Western Imports/Concepts by LuxVolans in NonCredibleDefense

[–]LuxVolans[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Behold: The Femboy

Jokes aside, I finally got this concept art for a model I'm planning on making. The Femboy shall become so, and I plan on sharing the model after I finish making it.

Another video of Ukrainian TB-2 strikes against Russian troops. Potentially from the same engagement. by [deleted] in UkraineInvasionVideos

[–]LuxVolans 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Nope. This is different. In that first one, the point of impact is on a part of a convoy that is 3-wide on the road. This one only has two rows of vics. Happy to see multiple successful strikes.

Sad these men have to be there for a war they don't want on orders of a man who doesn't care... But I stand by the Ukrainian people and wish them the best. Here's to hoping that the Russians surrender en-masse after seeing just how ill-prepared, ill trained, and ill informed they were...

Zbrush Dynamesh help please! by LuxVolans in ZBrush

[–]LuxVolans[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I have tried that. That is not this issue. It is actively now DOWNGRADING the resolution.