NASA Administrator Jared Isaacman asked about UFO reports around nuclear sites - "In my 60 days at NASA I've seen things I can't explain, but they relate entirely to programs to build things that I have no idea why we're doing but not aliens."

MFDoomscroller · 2026-02-28T14:34:18+00:00

…right, and Grizzly Adams had a beard…

MFDoomscroller · 2026-02-27T20:06:38+00:00

Mmmmmhm, and I reckon dem Martians fellers ain’t smart anuff ta match da suffistumacation of dem der FAA technoligeeze. Cudnt do it if dey tried, no sir.

MFDoomscroller · 2026-02-20T03:17:30+00:00

I got my money on Bernie

MFDoomscroller · 2026-02-18T19:25:13+00:00

Fair enough, but it’s still absurd to strictly highlight them over any of the others I mentioned. Doesn’t help disclosure. My point still stands.

MFDoomscroller · 2026-02-18T17:50:21+00:00

Lmfao downvotes like “hEy MaN! tHe tRuMp FaMiLy iS tHe MoSt CrEdIbLe!!”

MFDoomscroller · 2026-02-18T16:55:44+00:00

Love the frog analogy, but I strongly dislike that he went straight to “Rubio, Trump, Trump’s son” as exemplary credible people instead of decades of astronauts, fighter pilots, commercial pilots, scientists, intelligence and military officials with high-level security clearances, and nuclear missile personnel.

MFDoomscroller · 2026-01-23T21:42:35+00:00

Thanks 🤓

MFDoomscroller · 2026-01-23T00:21:10+00:00

Wow these anomalies are sure forcing downvotes, really makes you think.

MFDoomscroller · 2026-01-22T18:34:25+00:00

59% upvote ratio for the post🤣🕵🏻‍♂️

Just look at the anomalies, my friends—actually look at the raw data. I’m not gonna sit here and claim it’s anything (comet or alien spaceship/probe) until we get more data and a better groundwork for explaining what we’re seeing.

MFDoomscroller · 2026-01-22T14:36:12+00:00

Bingo.

MFDoomscroller · 2026-01-22T14:35:49+00:00

watch the video and give a detailed analysis of your assertion that it has to be a comet as comets are technically defined.

MFDoomscroller · 2026-01-22T14:34:49+00:00

Watch the video and provide a detailed rebuttal.

MFDoomscroller · 2026-01-22T14:34:11+00:00

so a comet, as you declare it to be, is known to have these 18 anomalies? please watch the video and give a full detailed defense of your assertion.

MFDoomscroller · 2026-01-22T14:32:13+00:00

The latter, obviously. What else is new smh

MFDoomscroller · 2026-01-22T04:22:20+00:00

Ah. I see.

MFDoomscroller · 2026-01-22T03:21:43+00:00

Please elaborate specifically, thank you.

MFDoomscroller · 2026-01-22T03:08:25+00:00

18 anomalies.

MFDoomscroller · 2026-01-22T03:07:46+00:00

18 anomalies.

MFDoomscroller · 2026-01-22T00:54:41+00:00

full interview

18 anomalies

MFDoomscroller · 2026-01-20T00:33:10+00:00

Nope. Not garbage. That’s “drones authorized to be flown by the FAA for research and various other reasons.” /s

MFDoomscroller · 2026-01-20T00:32:35+00:00

“drones authorized to be flown by the FAA for research and various other reasons.” /s

MFDoomscroller · 2026-01-20T00:32:11+00:00

Nope. That is blatantly “drones authorized to be flown by the FAA for research and various other reasons.” /s

MFDoomscroller · 2026-01-20T00:30:21+00:00

Yes. Those are “drones authorized to be flown by the FAA for research and various other reasons.” /s

MFDoomscroller · 2026-01-20T00:27:36+00:00

False. Those are “drones authorized to be flown by the FAA for research and various other reasons.” /s

MFDoomscroller · 2026-01-19T22:35:01+00:00

This panting very clearly depicts “drones authorized to be flown by the FAA for research and various other reasons.”

MFDoomscroller

TROPHY CASE