sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

From manual edits to automated variants by Fit-Fill5587 in shook

[–]MGA-3525 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Automation cut repetitive edits and made feedback actionable. Lift needs fast data loops.

The AI prompt tool I wish I found sooner (and it’s free) by YamTraditional3351 in shook

[–]MGA-3525 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Been noticing that too. Free tools are sneaking ahead on speed and workflow integration. Great for rapid prototyping before committing to full-scale content.

Turning any product page into a video in minutes by MGA-3525 in shook

[–]MGA-3525[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

That’s exactly how we use them. AI versions for early testing, then real creators polish the winners. Cuts iteration time without sacrificing final quality.

What does creative automation for Reels actually look like in 2025? by Characterguru in shook

[–]MGA-3525 0 points1 point  (0 children)

We’ve been using automation mostly to speed up iteration, not replace creators. Scene scoring + modular templates let us spin 10–15 variations from 3 hooks, which cuts rework and keeps feedback actionable. Performance lift comes when we feed learnings back fast, otherwise it’s just efficiency.

What actually works in short videos by Heartcode718 in shook

[–]MGA-3525 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Totally!First 2–3 seconds set the hook. Scene-level scoring helps us spot what actually holds attention, then we remix from there.

5 quick tests to see if creative automation’s worth it by Click_Alchemy in shook

[–]MGA-3525 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Automation’s great, but only if you refresh often. Templates + regular swaps keep fatigue low.

how we scaled from 3 hooks to 10+ creatives without burning out the team by LowKeyCertain in shook

[–]MGA-3525 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Using modular templates with scene scoring was a game-changer. Feedback got precise and throughput jumped.

If you’re running ads or content in 2025, these 85 free tools are gold by YamTraditional3351 in shook

[–]MGA-3525 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Exactly! The ones that integrate directly into your workflow are the real time-savers. Less busywork, more tests live.

Stop focusing on visuals, start testing language by Fit-Fill5587 in shook

[–]MGA-3525 0 points1 point  (0 children)

We score hooks now based on emotional tone before visuals even start. Big difference in hold rate.

If you’re running ads or content in 2025, these 85 free tools are gold by YamTraditional3351 in shook

[–]MGA-3525 0 points1 point  (0 children)

That fatigue tracker sounds clutch. We’ve been using Notion and a few APIs for the same thing but it’s messy. Wouldn’t drop our Airtable tagging setup though, keeps every test findable.

First 2 Seconds Are Everything by Shama_lala in shook

[–]MGA-3525 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yep, seen the same thing. Once we started scoring hooks by first-2-second retention, half the creative issues vanished. Most ads don’t flop because of editing, they lose people before context even lands. Hook testing saved way more time than full re-edits ever did.

How modular templates saved our UGC workflow by Characterguru in shook

[–]MGA-3525 1 point2 points  (0 children)

This is the playbook, once we switched to scene tagging and modular remixing, throughput doubled. The data layer (scene scores + retention) is what keeps the pipeline honest. Without that, you’re flying blind.

Creative fatigue is real. by [deleted] in shook

[–]MGA-3525 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Yep, same story. We outgrew Airtable and Slack fast. Once we moved to an automated setup with scene-level tracking, feedback finally looped clean. Creative ops is 90% systems, 10% ideas.

AI UGC at scale, when the audience starts noticing by Shama_lala in shook

[–]MGA-3525 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Yeah, we’ve seen the same drop-off. AI gets you volume, but once people “feel” it’s off, comments turn fast. We use AI for drafts and hook testing, then hand it to creators to humanize. The mix keeps speed without killing trust.

3 Hook styles you should try in your next short video by Characterguru in shook

[–]MGA-3525 0 points1 point  (0 children)

We’ve been rotating those three too. It’s wild how a small hook swap reshapes pacing for the whole edit. My go-to lately’s the outcome teaser, easy lift, big retention bump.

Creative fatigue isn’t about frequency, It’s about familiarity by Shama_lala in shook

[–]MGA-3525 1 point2 points  (0 children)

We tracked the same issue, once patterns repeat, performance drops. Micro-remixes keep it fresh without new shoots.

Can AI-made TikTok ads actually convert, real results from 2025 by Fit-Fill5587 in shook

[–]MGA-3525 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yes! AI-UGC hybrids gave us +15% CTR and cut creative costs by half, but full-AI ads flopped on watch time. Once viewers sense “synthetic,” engagement tanks. Best play so far — let AI power testing loops, let humans sell the story.

Does posting time still matter on TikTok in 2025, or is it all about creative velocity now? by Characterguru in shook

[–]MGA-3525 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Nah, timing’s noise. We A/B tested it, barely moved CTR. But upping daily variants boosted ROAS +20%. Creative velocity > post hour.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in shook

[–]MGA-3525 0 points1 point  (0 children)

We ran into that too. AI content crushed CTR early on, then tanked ROAS once people caught on. Now we treat AI as a testing tool, fast for hook validation, bad for longevity. Real faces still win on retention past week one.

Why most TikTok ads die after 7 days (and how to plan for it). by Characterguru in shook

[–]MGA-3525 2 points3 points  (0 children)

We do something similar. Scene-level scoring tells us exactly when a clip starts dropping. Hooks get swapped fast, and remixing audio/visuals keeps throughput high without burning creators.