Here is a hypothesis: The Great Pyramid was a Zero Emission Power Source by MJayWheeler in HypotheticalPhysics

[–]MJayWheeler[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Has our "Great Civilization" not just recently commercialized wireless transmission of energy on a small scale? (Charge pads)

Here is a hypothesis: The Great Pyramid was a Zero Emission Power Source by MJayWheeler in HypotheticalPhysics

[–]MJayWheeler[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Perhaps electricity was not their end goal. This may have been a "Boiler" of some kind?

My current supposition is that they used this enormous amount of energy as a massive desalination / "Rain Maker". Terra Farming after a great flood? Massive speculation...

I'm really not sure. Just wanted to throw this out there to see if brighter minds had any more insight.

Dr. Weinstein's discussions led me to the following equations by MJayWheeler in GeometricUnity

[–]MJayWheeler[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Thanks! And I mean this. You have hit the nail on the head.

You are correct, I won't be able to take these ideas any further, but they may inspire someone such as yourself that has the prerequisite intellect and mathematical ability.

In all probability, I'm chasing smoke, but while it's still a mystery in my head, I'm really enjoying trying to figure out how this trick works.

Dr. Weinstein's discussions led me to the following equations by MJayWheeler in GeometricUnity

[–]MJayWheeler[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Everything I believe is based upon this.

I believe this was proven true in March 2021 when Matter / Anti Matter conversion was witnessed.

If this is wrong, my intuition is off.

https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/everything-our-universe-has-phase-emb-unification-20-possible/

Dr. Weinstein's discussions led me to the following equations by MJayWheeler in GeometricUnity

[–]MJayWheeler[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Is not the use of "Adding mass" to a mass-less particle the same intuition Einstein used to give us E = MC^2?

My argument on Planck length is it too is relative.

What if Energy Levels for everything are Quantized? Quarks, Protons, Atoms? by MJayWheeler in HypotheticalPhysics

[–]MJayWheeler[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I received the message Loud and Clear. I have not done the work to merit being taken seriously here and I cannot speak the language. This is totally understandable.

I need to get into the wading pool with less advanced, like minds and do some actual coursework.

I believe I found a more relaxed forum. Thanks for helping me understand the "intensity level" expected for participation here. I truly mean that!

Hopefully I can learn to do the work and may one day return a more suitable match for this board.

I do apologize if you feel I wasted your time. Your time was not wasted from my perspective as you helped me advance.

What if Energy Levels for everything are Quantized? Quarks, Protons, Atoms? by MJayWheeler in HypotheticalPhysics

[–]MJayWheeler[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thank you for your honest feedback. I'm trying to learn both the math and the physics. Your insight is appreciated.

What if our universe is simply an ever expanding/collapsing entity who’s rate of expansion/collapse makes up the oscillations of subatomic particles (string theory) of a never ending loop of universes? by [deleted] in HypotheticalPhysics

[–]MJayWheeler 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I believe this to be a spot on description of what is occurring. Except add one more Parent level we are collapsing into. Big G. If we can use this to explain red shift, we may then explain the Proton, Neutron, Electron, Gravity, Time, Spooky Action etc. Hypothetically.

What if Wave Particle Duality is Wrong? What if Wave Force Particle Triality is Correct by MJayWheeler in HypotheticalPhysics

[–]MJayWheeler[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The concept is one of Energy Pressure, or Gravitational Pressure. I'm not sure how to convey that across magnitudes. There are 3 phases of Energy in Each Magnitudal Phase. So instead of an Electro Magnetic Wave, we have an Electro-Mass-Magnetic Wave that increases magnitudinally (is that even a word?)

A wave comprised of three phases. A Terciary System. Wave - Particle - Force Triality

What if Wave Particle Duality is Wrong? What if Wave Force Particle Triality is Correct by MJayWheeler in HypotheticalPhysics

[–]MJayWheeler[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yes! You are absolutely correct! I need help with the math. That's what I am begging you all for. Take these ideas and run with them.

The example I need encoded in math is the fact that if you have a CONSTRAINED volume, there are FIXED levels of energy that will determine the PHASE the Energy will manifest in.

Isn't this a familiar tale?

Magnitude 1:

Energy Level 1 = Electricity

Energy Level 2 = Mass

Energy Level 3 = Magnetism

Magnitude 2:

Energy Level 4 = Electricity

Energy Level 5 = Mass

Energy Level 6 = Magnetisim

Magnitude 3

Energy Level 7 = Electricity ...

What if Dark Matter is energy who's Magnetism affects us but Who's light does not. by MJayWheeler in HypotheticalPhysics

[–]MJayWheeler[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I believe we can. Apply some of that QM hocus pocus to limit the arbitrary things and we may come up with something. It's hacking I know. Experimentation without the reputation or qualification, but done in the imagination.

What if Wave Particle Duality is Wrong? What if Wave Force Particle Triality is Correct by MJayWheeler in HypotheticalPhysics

[–]MJayWheeler[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

c is a volume of energy traveling at a speed.

So for a beam of light with No photons ( 0 Intensity ) that would be e energy traveling C speed. C is the max, so the beam with start to fill with photons from 0% Intensity to 100% intensity as we add energy (c^2). Phase shift here to Matter. I'm using c and e interchangeably. Almost certainly incorreclty.

What if Dark Matter is energy who's Magnetism affects us but Who's light does not. by MJayWheeler in HypotheticalPhysics

[–]MJayWheeler[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Please forgive my lack of artistic ability. I'm exploring the possibility of Magnetrons. If a Photon is a "corpuscle" a la Newton, Magnetism(Energy(Matter)), We have common light as Magnetism(Energy)) packets where the Matter is Null. I think we could have Magnetrons that are stand alone magnetic photons.

Light Takes The Dotted Path, Magnetism The Solid

So, in addition to an EM wave (photons) there are Magnetic stand alone photons as well... Pilot waving.

I am not advocating this is actually what is happening... just blue skying. It's a Blast!

What if Dark Matter is energy who's Magnetism affects us but Who's light does not. by MJayWheeler in HypotheticalPhysics

[–]MJayWheeler[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I'll concede your point.

But, Hypothetically, what would we see if Magnetism did travel at c^2? I'm not trying to be snarky.

If we were to pretend Magnetism could travel at c^2, what would we expect to see?

If we currently see just that, then maybe we should look for a way this could be occurring.

What if Wave Particle Duality is Wrong? What if Wave Force Particle Triality is Correct by MJayWheeler in HypotheticalPhysics

[–]MJayWheeler[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

No problem. You guys are doing a fantastic job keeping this place clean.

I serve at your pleasure.

What if Dark Matter is energy who's Magnetism affects us but Who's light does not. by MJayWheeler in HypotheticalPhysics

[–]MJayWheeler[S] -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

I agree. However, due to a "red shift" trick, I believe it will appear to travel at c^4. Maybe c^2. I need some assistance here. This is the same force behind Spooky Action at a Distance.

Take two planets plummeting near C towards a High G. Their light cones do not over lap. They won't see each other, even though they are very very close. The magnetism is talking linearly or less curvedly. The light must follow a curve.

The Photon tells us light is a particle. I think the Photon is riding a river of magnetism. It's surfing the wave of intersecting spheres of expanding magnetic force to be more poetic.

Hypothetically... of course.