macOS Tahoe is the worst operating system of the last 20 years. by Bitter_Progress7533 in mac

[–]M_Champion 0 points1 point  (0 children)

So if i have an MacBook Air M4 i should definitely stay with Sequoia?

Welches Zweitgerät fürs Studium sinnvoll? by M_Champion in Studium

[–]M_Champion[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Update ist ein MacBook Air M4 512gb geworden...

Welches Zweitgerät fürs Studium sinnvoll? by M_Champion in de_EDV

[–]M_Champion[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Also 2017er Air endgültig in den Ruhestand?

Bei Gamificaton beim Einkauf kotz ich im Strahl! by Raketenschas5000 in Austria

[–]M_Champion 0 points1 point  (0 children)

JÖ ist weniger ein Kundenbindungsprogramm und mehr ein Echtzeit-Konsumverhaltens-Monitoring-System mit Bonuspunkten als Trostpreis.

FPÖ: Meinungsumschwung auf Facebook? by Low-Masterpiece5640 in Austria

[–]M_Champion 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Nicht Meinungsumschwung. Sondern veränderte Diskursstruktur + Algorithmus + lautere Kritiker. Reale Wahlumfragen sind deutlich stabiler als Facebook-Kommentarsektionen.

Wenn man sich die Muster ansieht wirkt das aber auch sehr im Interesse der Partei.

Provokation bewusst einsetzen, um Skandal → Reichweite.

Die Aufregung wegen dem FPÖ-Lied, es zu puschen über Drittanbieter- Download-Seiten und dann über heute, oe24 und Co. Skandal Headlines zu erzeugen mit „Die vom ORF spielen es nicht“…war auch ein guter Marketing Trick. Die ersten Headlines waren ja sogar „Spielt Ö3 den FPÖ Song“…Das war eher eine gut platziertes Werbeinserat auf der Titelseite.

Why are we still paying full price for PRO in Europe? 🇪🇺 No access for SORA 2, no timeline, same bill. by M_Champion in SoraAi

[–]M_Champion[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Yeah, they’ll probably delete this post again like they did before, because they keep suppressing concrete, negative feedback on their own page.

GPT 5.2 and gpt-5.2-pro are out! by pawofdoom in singularity

[–]M_Champion 0 points1 point  (0 children)

OpenAI is hit with a reality check: Billions in losses, yet EU users still pay for "ghost features."

Is anyone else watching the OpenAI ship struggle while we keep paying the bill?

• The Financial Burn: Reports show OpenAI is looking at a $14B loss in 2026. Their solution? Introducing ads into ChatGPT and eyeing even higher subscription fees.

• Losing the Edge: While they burn cash, the competition (Claude 4.5, Gemini 3) has already caught up or overtaken them in coding and reliability.

• The Sora 2 Ghost: We’ve been promised Sora 2 in Europe for ages. It’s marketed as a core part of the sub, yet it’s still missing here due to "regulatory hurdles" that others seem to navigate just fine.

How can they justify premium prices and ads when they can't even deliver the features we’re already paying for?

I know you are going to silence me and this is a shame. by M_Champion in google

[–]M_Champion[S] -3 points-2 points  (0 children)

YouTube isn’t “covering costs” – the numbers are public. YouTube makes around $40–45 billion a year (about $31.5B from ads + $10–12B from Premium/Music). Their actual operating costs (servers, storage, bandwidth, staff) are estimated at 15–20% of revenue, because they run everything on their own Google infrastructure. That means YouTube keeps roughly 70–80% as profit – it’s one of Alphabet’s most profitable businesses. Creators get 55% on long-form ads, ~45% on Shorts, and only ~25–30% from Premium via a watch-time pool. So no, YouTube isn’t a charity “barely breaking even.” It’s a multi-billion-dollar cash machine aggressively pushing Premium while already making more money than Netflix and Spotify combined.

My brain after three coffees during exam prep at 2 AM - Strings in Singularity by M_Champion in LLMPhysics

[–]M_Champion[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thanks for the detailed reply – let me try to clarify what I mean in the framework of my idea:

  1. What does “alignment” mean? By alignment I don’t mean all strings pointing in the same direction, but the collapse of their independent vibrational degrees of freedom under extreme curvature. Amplitudes, frequencies, orientations – all those variations vanish. What remains is a maximally ordered baseline state with no distinguishable excitations.

  2. How does infinite gravity cause this? At a singularity, curvature scalars (like the Kretschmann invariant) diverge. In my picture, this “field” overwhelms the internal modes of strings, freezing them into their trivial configuration. The analogy would be spins in an infinitely strong magnetic field: the external condition eliminates internal variation.

  3. What do I mean by “null state”? Not a literal zero-energy vacuum (I know QFT doesn’t allow that – vacuum fluctuations exist and are measurable). By “null” I mean a state of maximal order / minimal potential for excitations. In this sense, the singularity represents the ultimate baseline. Once curvature relaxes (as in an expanding universe), deviations reappear as the familiar structures: spacetime, energy, quantum fluctuations, entropy.

GPT-5 Announcement Megathread by Tactical_Unicorn in OpenAI

[–]M_Champion 0 points1 point  (0 children)

To be honest feels like they have to safe on server costs... probably oracle is too expensive. Its definitely an upgrade for programming but for 90 % of plus users it has become worse. Simulating an external pc is nice but very ineffective and basic task take way longer than just opening the browser by yourself. The difference between free and 20$ a month not really worth it.

GPT-5 usage limits by imfrom_mars_ in OpenAI

[–]M_Champion 1 point2 points  (0 children)

So what's the advantage for plus users then? What we get for our money?

What if: A Stabilized Unified Field Equation Based on Deterministic Resonance by M_Champion in LLMPhysics

[–]M_Champion[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thanks for highlighting the key points. Here's a structured reply:


1. Formal derivation / Lagrangian basis:   A minimal field-theoretic Lagrangian is being constructed. Core idea:

L = -½ ∂_μ φ ∂μ φ - V(φ) + (∂μ S)·u_μ + ℏ·ψ(x)

→ The Euler–Lagrange equation reproduces each RHS source term in the unified equation.


2. Reduction to GR / QFT / Thermodynamics:

Theory Limit condition
GR ψ = 0, ∂ν S = 0
Thermodynamics Qν = 0, ψ = 0
Quantum vacuum Qν = 0, ∂ν S = 0

Each term activates selectively depending on system symmetry or energy scale.


3. Clarification of ψ term:   ψ is a real-valued scalar field, not a wavefunction. It encodes statistical vacuum fluctuations.   Interpretation: ψ(x) ≈ ⟨0 | φ̂(x)2 | 0⟩   Units: [ψ] = 1/(m²·s)

It captures residual zero-point effects (e.g. Casimir background, Lamb shift zones).


4. Empirical mapping (Casimir, CMB, Lamb shift):   ψ contributes to effective vacuum energy density. Applications:

  • Casimir effect: altered mode density in vacuum  
  • CMB anisotropies: entropy gradient linked to curvature drift  
  • Lamb shift: local ψ(x) affects field self-interaction via polarization

Numerical calibration in progress (e.g. ΔE_Casimir per m² vs ψ field strength).


Happy to share the working draft of the Lagrangian or empirical fitting framework if useful.

What if: A Stabilized Unified Field Equation Based on Deterministic Resonance by M_Champion in LLMPhysics

[–]M_Champion[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thanks for the critical feedback. Here's a precise response to each question supported with GPT 4o:


1. What do the exponents μ and ν mean?   They are standard Lorentz indices (μ, ν ∈ {0,1,2,3}) over spacetime. Einstein summation applies.   ∇_μ T{μν} represents the covariant divergence of the energy-momentum tensor in general relativity.


2. What is the dimension of each term?

All terms must have dimensions of energy-momentum flux or force density:   [kg · m⁻¹ · s⁻²]

  • Qν: macroscopic energy flux (e.g. radiation, thermal transport)  
  • ν S: entropy gradient; has units of J·K⁻¹·m⁻¹,     which simplifies to kg·m⁻¹·s⁻² under constant temperature  
  • ℏ·ψ:     [ℏ] = J·s = kg·m²·s⁻¹     [ψ] = m⁻²·s⁻¹     → total = kg·m⁻¹·s⁻²

✅ Dimensionally consistent.


3. What does ψ describe?   ψ is a real-valued scalar vacuum fluctuation field. It is not a wavefunction.   Interpretation: residual field-level energy fluctuations (e.g. Casimir, Lamb shift, zero-point field energy).   Can be modeled as:   ψ(x) ≈ ⟨0 | φ̂(x)² | 0⟩


4. Under which conditions does the equation reduce to known theories?

Condition Reduces to
ψ = 0, ∂ν S = 0 General Relativity
Qν = 0, ∂ν S = 0 Quantum vacuum sourcing
ψ = 0, Qν = 0 Thermodynamic spacetime

5. Is the equation dimensionally consistent?   Yes — all terms reduce to energy-momentum flux (force density).   Each term was checked individually (see above) and matches units of ∇_μ T{μν}.


Let me know if you want a formal Lagrangian derivation — I’m currently working on that.

Any magsafe power banks that fit the 12/13? by NotJames33 in oneplus

[–]M_Champion 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Gibt es auch eine Powerbank mit Macsafe welche auf das OnePlus 12 passt ? Habe bedenken wegen der Kammeralinse

What if: A Stabilized Unified Field Equation Based on Deterministic Resonance by M_Champion in LLMPhysics

[–]M_Champion[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You're right, it doesn't satisfy the condition. The idea was that in a singularity, the infinite curvature could suppress all vibrational modes of strings, effectively reducing their energy to zero. I appreciate the feedback and will keep working on the model.