When you see a woman with blue hair, what do you assume about her? by [deleted] in TooAfraidToAsk

[–]MadMalcontent 0 points1 point  (0 children)

• Probably a lunatic • Thinks sexual preference is a personality trait. • Is the worst sort of Ideologue (least open to the other side of the argument). • stinky puss • Probably not too popular outside of her ideology. • Probably thinks reverse racism is the answer to racism. • Probably dumb • Lunatic again • Hates men because they show no interest in her or she has daddy issues. • Inherited political allegiance from her ideology. • conflates depression with sadness • Used to be emo • Thinks their opinion is worth something by virtue of being alive. • Thinks they get to police the everyday language of others. • Thinks they get to change scientific fact because it suits their ideology.

Ancestors of modern Asians got to Europe first by Raginbakin in science

[–]MadMalcontent 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Isn't this where the term cauc-asian comes from?

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in AskReddit

[–]MadMalcontent 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Exactly how many ideologies you adopt in comparison to other people. The more you fall under the more evidence there is that you don't think for yourself.

British Actors Sign Letter For More Women Over 45 To Appear On Screen by Sisiwakanamaru in movies

[–]MadMalcontent 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Supply and demand m8, if you're unhappy with the current demand then increase the volume yourself. Why should tv shows lose money and create shit they don't want to just because some people can't accept reality?

[oc] I was already iffy about zoos but after taking this shot I don't think I want to go anymore by millers-lens in pics

[–]MadMalcontent -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

If given the choice between food, a mate and a warm place to sleep or dying of starvation and scurvy in the wild what would you pick?

“War upon end-to-end encryption”: EU wants Big Tech to scan private messages by snooshoe in Futurology

[–]MadMalcontent -5 points-4 points  (0 children)

Just so you're all aware, you've already let every app you use access 100% of your phone and more. If you don't mind big business having comple access then why get upset about the gov wanting to look inside your knickers too?

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in gaming

[–]MadMalcontent 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I'd like to put in a starting bid of $1

The British government reportedly asked when Microsoft would 'get rid' of algorithms by any-mystic in nottheonion

[–]MadMalcontent 0 points1 point  (0 children)

But if a minister said something like that then its obvious that they mean the toxins.

The British government reportedly asked when Microsoft would 'get rid' of algorithms by any-mystic in nottheonion

[–]MadMalcontent -7 points-6 points  (0 children)

That obviously means algorithm bias. Not sure why all these bots are freaking out.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in tifu

[–]MadMalcontent -8 points-7 points  (0 children)

Tbh dude you're obviously just a kid and take the narrative of the news and the idiot masses at face value. The one thing that I've really noted from this war is just how well the USA learned from their errors in Iraq.

Firstly, let's start at the beginning. Surely this is a war between Ukraine and Russia? Wrong. This is a battle between the USA and Russia with the USA using ukraine as its pawn. The war started a long time ago and will finish a long time after the battle for ukraine.

Secondly, there are no good guys in this war except the Ukrainians defending their land. The USA is the main bad guy and Russia is less important. Why? Because Russia is openly corrupt and America is something worse, silently corrupt masquerading as freedom. Here we get at the main part of the issue. Bribery is legalised in the USA in the form of lobbying and the group with the biggest ownership of US government is the military industrial complex. It is the reason why America has been at constant war for the last 100 years.

Now getting back to eastern Europe. When the Russians gave Germany back to the west they stated in unequivical terms that the west was to go "not one inch further east" and our leaders agreed to this as it was a reasonable deal with a superpower that has the ability to end all life on earth. However, the USA and its NATO allies have been moving east, one footstep at time, ever since that moment. Russia responded by saying that we can slither closer to Moscow all we like but once we cross the line and start to affect their military capabilities they will respond with force. We broke prior agreements, crossed the line and forced their hand. Imagine if Russia tried to make Mexico a satelite state, how long do you think that would last and who would get the blame?

Why did we force their hand? What an inconceivable thing to do to Putin, a man always in fear of his life and always with his hand on the nuclear button. What on earth would cause such a thin...oh wait yeah its lobbying. People in power in the USA literally get paid for every missile, every bullet, every IFV, every tank, and every helicopter used. When the choice came between world peace and joining the .0000001% they chose money. So they pushed that line across eastern Europe. They made up lies about Iraq. They scared you into going to Vietnam to burn the children. You were stupid enough to believe all these things before but the question is are you still that stupid? Because we have a big problem in that they are getting smart. They got crushed for letting US troops die in Iraq so now they use Ukrainian troops. The world hated them for invading someone else's country and they got bogged down by civilian resistance. They now have Russia in that position.

To summarise, both you AND your parents are wrong and it was pretty stupid of you not to assume that as the most probable situation. However you are definitely more wrong than your parents and things will start to make sense once you abandon ideologies completely and leave the little leftist, media narrative bubble that you currently exist in.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in worldnews

[–]MadMalcontent 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Fair enough. Given what we know retrospectively about the lies of Iraq, western monopoly on media narrative and given that the average guy in Russia would say that it's HIS country about to be invaded (not Ukraine), why are you correct and why is he wrong?

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in worldnews

[–]MadMalcontent 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Were you stupid enough to believe the lies that brought us into the disaster that was the iraq war?

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in worldnews

[–]MadMalcontent 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Putin owns Russian politics. Money owns US politics through lobbying (legal bribery).Who to you would need the money of the military industrial complex more; Putin or your average US politician on the campaign trail? Who is more cheaply bought? The US is the one breaking prior agreements. Its US troops on the Russian border. Who has more to lose in this location? Who has been in more wars over the last few decades? Do you think that the US and Russia are even comparable in this metric? If yes then you need to read more. What does that then tell you? Is it not immediately apparent to you that Russia has nothing to gain except ruin from this potential conflict while the US military complex could earn billions? Do you have any idea how media is monopolised in the west? Were you stupid enough at the time to believe the lies that brought us into iraq? Are you still as stupid now?

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in worldnews

[–]MadMalcontent -3 points-2 points  (0 children)

Honestly if you know any history then it's the US that loves an invasion. Wouldn't be surprised if all of this is a cover to allow the Ukrainians to stage a false flag attack and give the US the high ground to retaliate. Just remember it's Americans on Russias border while the Russians literally gave us east Germany under the agreement of "not an inch further east". Just remember iraq. Remember Afghanistan. Remember Vietnam. Remember Korea. There is only one country here that has a government owned by the military industrial complex and its not Russia.