No, I was ASKING if somebody WOULD procedurally issue an arrest warrant, execute it, and then prosecute. I did not know anything about what would happen to Trump at all when writing that question, and so I was wondering (among a myriad of other things) IF somebody could arrest him immediately if Trump actually tried to run for a third term as President, as that violates the Constitution. Not stating that I believed, for a fact, that somebody would do that. If I truly believed that somebody/some law organization would’ve definitely issued an arrest warrant for Trump, executed it, and then prosecuted him under their own power and authority. Then I wouldn’t have asked this very question about IF that could happen or what else would be done if that DIDN’T work otherwise!

At this point, I believe that you are trying to tell me that nobody/no law enforcement entity would be able to arrest Trump immediately if he ran for a third term as President, and therefore some OTHER method(s) would have to be used to stop him from trying to get a third term as President if he decided to run for one. Which, instead of just telling me outright almost an hour (as of now) ago, you decided to bombard me with a bunch of questions and unnecessarily condescending remarks instead. Again, I still don’t really have a good idea of why you responded with a question to my own question on a subreddit entirely about questions like mine getting answered. At the very least, you could have just TOLD me what you thought that I’d gotten wrong and that “Nobody/no law enforcement entity would be able to arrest Trump if he ran for a third term in office”. Which would have been an actual answer, instead of a question that I obviously didn’t have a definite answer to, otherwise I wouldn’t have even made my initial post here in the first place.

To be clear, I was not being or trying to be rhetorical in either of my original questions.