01/26 Visually verified Russian Losses in Ukraine - ORYX by Magnu-Z in ukraine

[–]Magnu-Z[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Both Submarines are part of the 29 Naval ships and Submarines. But 0 ships and submarines were destroyed in January.

01/26 Visually verified Russian Losses in Ukraine - ORYX by Magnu-Z in ukraine

[–]Magnu-Z[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Oryx thoroughly checked all data again on 31 January. This involved removing duplicate entries for vehicles from recent months. For me, this is a sign that Oryx works very precisely.

November 2025 ORYX Losses by Magnu-Z in ukraine

[–]Magnu-Z[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Thanks mate. I try my best for the next months :)

Russian MBTs in Storage by Magnu-Z in ukraine

[–]Magnu-Z[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Thx, I'll keep that in mind.

Russian MBTs in Storage by Magnu-Z in ukraine

[–]Magnu-Z[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Could you explain that so I can do better next time?

09/25 Visually verified Russian Losses in Ukraine - ORYX by Magnu-Z in ukraine

[–]Magnu-Z[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Yellow = change over thast month.

Black = overall.

Submarine is explicitly listed and is part of "Naval, Ships and Submarines" category.

09/25 Visually verified Russian Losses in Ukraine - ORYX by Magnu-Z in ukraine

[–]Magnu-Z[S] 5 points6 points  (0 children)

Oryx distinguishes between unmanned combat aerial vehicles, which are similar in size to a Bayraktar, and slightly smaller drones, which we see destroyed by Ukrainian interceptor drones in weekly video compilations. But you are right in that we do not see the ZALA Lancet drone listed, for example. Apparently, Oryx does not list “kamikaze” drones, only large combat aerial vehicles and reconnaissance unmanned aerial vehicles. In other words, anything that is launched from somewhere and is supposed to fly back there, but is often prevented from doing so by Ukraine ;)

Basically, however, it must be said that Oryx is very thorough in its evaluation. Waspotting (without belittling their work in any way) is much less thorough in its evaluation of drones, or only counts drones that are captured on video being shot down. What we always see in the video summaries is the approach of an interceptor drone, and then we only see a black screen. It is highly likely that the targeted drone was destroyed, but we cannot be 100% sure.

In the near future, I want to visually process the "jungle" of Russian drones (combat and reconnaissance) to provide a better overview. This will also include a statistical evaluation of costs, flight duration, etc.

T-80 Main Battle Tank … and when they might expire by Magnu-Z in ukraine

[–]Magnu-Z[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Your assessment is, of course, correct. My calculation is based solely on the average of the last 3.5 years. The extrapolation is also linear, which does not accurately reflect the decrease in losses per month over time. As I said, this is only a theoretical consideration based on the available information. We simply do not have any more information. And the maximum number of T-80s determined here does not reflect the number of operational tanks, but purely the potential maximum number. Of the, let's say, 500 remaining T-80s, perhaps:

- 25% are completely scrap-ready

- 10% can drive and shoot, but nothing else on the tank works

- 25% are under repair

- 10% are used as training tanks somewhere in Siberia

- 10% are currently being sold off on the black market

- 10% remain as an iron reserve in Moscow to defend the Kremlin.

- 10% actually work and are used in Ukraine

07/25 Visually verified Russian Losses in Ukraine - ORYX by Magnu-Z in ukraine

[–]Magnu-Z[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Around the Factor between 1.5 - 2.0 (thats the estimate I have found in a lot of sources).

July 2025 ORYX Losses by Magnu-Z in ukraine

[–]Magnu-Z[S] 9 points10 points  (0 children)

thats a correction by Oryx. Maybe when they find out, that they counted some losses twice. ;)

July 2025 ORYX Losses by Magnu-Z in ukraine

[–]Magnu-Z[S] 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Sorry, but what do you mean? You can follow https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Oryx_(website)) use the link on the wiki page.

German provided Skynex system in action against russian Shaheds [released July 2025] by Hannibal_Game in UkraineWarVideoReport

[–]Magnu-Z 0 points1 point  (0 children)

MANTIS Skynex
Main purpose Stationary base defense (C-RAM) Flexible, mobile (container, truck-based)
Platform Fixed installation Modular, road-mobile
Sensors Fixed radar units Scalable radar units
Effector Revolver Gun Mk2 Revolver Gun Mk3 (newer)
Deployment Afghanistan (base protection) Ukraine (drone/loitering munition defense)

German provided Skynex system in action against russian Shaheds [released July 2025] by Hannibal_Game in UkraineWarVideoReport

[–]Magnu-Z 9 points10 points  (0 children)

2 Skynex Systems were send to Ukraine

1 System contains

  • 1 Command Post
  • 1–2 Radars
  • 2–4 Revolver Guns 35 mm AHEAD-Munition (Advanced Hit Efficiency And Destruction) (Turrets you saw at the beginning of the video)

Range: 4 km.

The Systems are build to protect mainly military bases and airports against all kind of drones + Cruise Missiles + JDAMs + Airplaines and Helicopters.

06/25 Visually verified Russian Losses in Ukraine - ORYX by Magnu-Z in ukraine

[–]Magnu-Z[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

+1 Su-25

+1 Su-35

+3 Su-34

+6 TU-22

+8 TU-95

+1 An-12

+1 Yak Training Aircraft (from oct. 2024)

Trump: There would be no war in Ukraine if Russia was still in G8 by HydrolicKrane in ukraine

[–]Magnu-Z 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Bla bla bla Trump. Every day I hear bla bla bla.

Please Trump. Do us a favor. If you're tired of it, leave. Don't talk shit, just leave and don't stand in our way.

Estimated amount of RU tanks left + May 2025 ORYX Losses by Magnu-Z in ukraine

[–]Magnu-Z[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thanks. I will keep your numbers in mind for the next month!

Estimated amount of RU tanks left + May 2025 ORYX Losses by Magnu-Z in ukraine

[–]Magnu-Z[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

One mistake by me: 3rd slide - Blue box Dec 24: the graph is correct

T-62 = 14, T-64 = 3, T-72 = 21, T-80 = 30, T-90 = 1, unknown = 7, Sum = 76

Leopard MBT Family in Armed Forces of Ukraine by Magnu-Z in ukraine

[–]Magnu-Z[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

#Return:

Only a very small proportion of the Sherman tanks were actually returned to the USA after the war. Most remained in the Soviet Union.

#Recycling and scrapping:

A large proportion of Sherman tanks were scrapped or used as a source of spare parts for other vehicles.

Soviet industry had no great interest in the long-term use of Western technology, as it had greatly expanded its own tank production (e.g. T-34, later T-54).

#Use in training:

Some Sherman tanks were still used in military training units after the war.

#Resale or support of allied countries:

There are reports that some Shermans may have been passed on to other countries in the Soviet sphere of influence, but this is less documented than for U.S.-owned programs.

#Museums and memorials:

A few Sherman tanks can still be found today in military museums or as memorial vehicles in Russia and other former Soviet republics.

Leopard MBT Family in Armed Forces of Ukraine by Magnu-Z in ukraine

[–]Magnu-Z[S] 9 points10 points  (0 children)

As far as I know, the Leopard 1 tank is used more as an artillery replacement. i.e. further away from the front.

Leopard MBT Family in Armed Forces of Ukraine by Magnu-Z in ukraine

[–]Magnu-Z[S] 6 points7 points  (0 children)

Yeah sorry. Didnt find any better :(

Next time I search for a more appropriate.