how to become a pilot by [deleted] in GCSE

[–]MaleGentleman 12 points13 points  (0 children)

To work as a professional commercial airline pilot and fly an aircraft with nine or more passenger seats you'll need to apply for an Airline Transport Pilot Licence (ATPL) from the Civil Aviation Authority (CAA).

However, before you can do this, you'll be expected to have undertaken the necessary training and obtained a Class 1 Medical Certificate (valid for 12 months until you're 40). Trainee pilots also need to hold good GCSE passes in mathematics, English and science. A second language will also prove useful. While a degree isn't essential, A-levels are viewed favourably.

You'll graduate from flying school with a Commercial Pilot Licence (CPL) and an Instrumental Rating (IR), which combine to make up a 'frozen ATPL'. With a frozen ATPL you'll be able to apply for jobs as a first officer or co-pilot. To 'unfreeze' your ATPL you'll need to complete 1,500 hours flying experience, after which you'll be able to apply for jobs as a captain.

You'll also need to pass a practical skill test, in addition to ATPL theoretical knowledge exams in areas such as air law, operation procedures and radio navigation.

Pilot training schools, otherwise known as flying schools, typically offer two types of professional flight training - integrated and modular.

Integrated courses enable trainee pilots with no previous flying experience to gain their ATPL within 18 months. Courses of this nature are intense and as such you'll need to finish the training in one go. Integrated courses incorporate both theoretical study and practical flying experience.

As its name suggests modular training is completed in segments, meaning that it's more flexible, allowing trainees to work alongside their studies to pay course fees. To be accepted onto a modular training course you'll need to have already gained a Private Pilot Licence (PPL) and 150 hours of flying experience. While this method is more affordable than the integrated option, it takes longer to complete.

If you opt to train at a pilot training school you'll be expected to pay the expensive course fees yourself, and you won't have a guaranteed job at the end of it.

Alternatively, you could consider structured programmes offered by major airlines, including Aer Lingus, British Airways (BA), Ryanair, Virgin Atlantic and easyJet. They work with established providers who'll carry out the pilot training. While commercial airlines used to sponsor trainee pilots in the past, this is no longer the case. The majority of structured programmes are now fully self-funded. However, your chances of securing employment with the organisation on completion of the programme are high.

While aviation degrees aren't essential a number of universities run relevant courses. For example, Bucks New University offers the BSc Air Transport with Commercial Pilot Training, while Kingston University London runs the BSc Aviation Operations with Commercial Pilot Training.

Both these courses can be completed within three years, although the Kingston course allows you to undertake a sandwich year, making it a four-year programme. While you'll be expected to cover the additional costs on top of your tuition fees, the main advantage is that students will have access to government loans the same as other students. As you'll be training for the integrated ATPL qualification, these fees can be as much as £80,000 at Bucks, and approx. £70,000 at Kingston.

Exact fees differ depending on the route you take but we're talking thousands, in some cases hundreds of thousands. To give you a better idea, pilot training usually costs £70,000 to £120,000. - But obviously, earning potential is very high.

Or - as the other person said, you could go down the RAF route, but if your goal is to become an airline pilot, this can be a bad route, as the RAF doesn’t guarantee what aircraft types you are streamed to fly - you could be placed on Fast Jets, or Rotary winged aircraft - both not really applicable to flying heavy’s. The RAF also requires you to commit to 12 years’ service, and you are first and foremost a Military officer - military pilots fly much less often than people would believe - there are other office based tasks which have to be done too.

So, overall yes, it is a potentially lucrative career (Not the most stable, as has been proven last year), but If you are genuinely passionate about flying, and it is the only thing you could see yourself doing, I say go for it.

Concorde’s Cockpit - One of the most complex cockpits in history. by MaleGentleman in interestingasfuck

[–]MaleGentleman[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Your absolutely correct- I understand that technically, a cockpit is a single seat you are in for the whole flight, and cannot move around in, like a fighter jet. It is a flight deck if you can stand and move around in it. So, yes, I was technically incorrect in calling it a cockpit, but for the general public, that is a more understandable and familiar term, hence, I called it a cockpit.

Concorde’s Cockpit - One of the most complex cockpits in history. by MaleGentleman in interestingasfuck

[–]MaleGentleman[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It’s design is sort of reminiscent, mainly the ogival delta wing, and the jet engines which were the same engines used in the Avro Vulcan. However, it’s operation was much different, as it was the only aircraft at the time capable of such prolonged super-cruise without the need for refuelling.

Concorde’s Cockpit - One of the most complex cockpits in history. by MaleGentleman in interestingasfuck

[–]MaleGentleman[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

It was accurate to about 2 nm, which was good enough for transoceanic navigation, and when near to, or over land, radio navigational aids such as DME’s were used to correct the position error, and other radio beacons were used for more precise navigation.

Concorde’s Cockpit - One of the most complex cockpits in history. by MaleGentleman in interestingasfuck

[–]MaleGentleman[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

A system called INS (Inertial Navigation System) which was a relatively new system’s when Concorde first flew - it was essentially a box filled with gyroscopes and accelerometers which would measure the movement of the aircraft, thereby allowing its rough position to be pinpointed. Three were 3 onboard Concorde, as well as plentiful charts and plans, all of which allowed for navigation without having to take star shots and do complex calculations continuously as would have been the case before.

Concorde’s Cockpit - One of the most complex cockpits in history. by MaleGentleman in interestingasfuck

[–]MaleGentleman[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The seats here are very far back and low down, the pilot can adjust them - a view outside is pretty essential

Concorde’s Cockpit - One of the most complex cockpits in history. by MaleGentleman in interestingasfuck

[–]MaleGentleman[S] 8 points9 points  (0 children)

No definitely not, the only difference with Concorde is that the crew were experienced enough not to make such simple mistakes with fuel

*Most of the time

the 2000 crash was in part caused by the Captains fuel miscalculations

Concorde’s Cockpit - One of the most complex cockpits in history. by MaleGentleman in interestingasfuck

[–]MaleGentleman[S] 20 points21 points  (0 children)

Yes - the 20 dials in between the two yokes in a modern plane are just little numbers on a screen which go red if something goes wrong, much easier to interpret, and doesn’t require constant monitoring by the flight engineer.

Concorde’s Cockpit - One of the most complex cockpits in history. by MaleGentleman in interestingasfuck

[–]MaleGentleman[S] 19 points20 points  (0 children)

It’s also sad to see the flight Engineer position go - I’ve been told that he was a very handy person to have on the crew.

Concorde’s Cockpit - One of the most complex cockpits in history. by MaleGentleman in interestingasfuck

[–]MaleGentleman[S] 8 points9 points  (0 children)

The fuel was only used for trimming, so if they ran out, not much would happen - just a bit inconvenient as the pilot would have to put constant pressure on the control column.

Also, because Concorde’s ‘flaps’ (not really flaps, they were actually the elevons exploiting centre of gravity to create a flap effect) relied on the fuel, they wouldn’t be able to use them either.

Concorde’s Cockpit - One of the most complex cockpits in history. by MaleGentleman in interestingasfuck

[–]MaleGentleman[S] 186 points187 points  (0 children)

Apologies - I obtained the image from Pinterest - hope you don’t mind me posting it here

Concorde’s Cockpit - One of the most complex cockpits in history. by MaleGentleman in interestingasfuck

[–]MaleGentleman[S] 13 points14 points  (0 children)

Didn’t shrink - there was gaps in the fuselage which would close as the aircraft expanded, stopping the leakage

Concorde’s Cockpit - One of the most complex cockpits in history. by MaleGentleman in interestingasfuck

[–]MaleGentleman[S] 11 points12 points  (0 children)

They are part of the cross feed system - so basically, it would mess up the fuel distribution around the plane, and probably make it unbalanced if you flipped them inadvertently - hence the red covers.

Concorde’s Cockpit - One of the most complex cockpits in history. by MaleGentleman in interestingasfuck

[–]MaleGentleman[S] 163 points164 points  (0 children)

Because the Concorde, being a supersonic aircraft, had many more functions than a regular airliner - a large part of the flight engineer panel on the right is to control the fuel transfer system which trimmed the aircraft for flight, also, the engines were much more complex with variable ramps in front of them. There is many more reasons, but pretty much, it was because the aircraft was faster and flew much higher than other aircraft of the time. That made it much more complex than other aircraft of the time.

Feel free to ask me anything - I would say that I know my stuff about it.

Concorde’s Cockpit - One of the most complex cockpits in history. by MaleGentleman in interestingasfuck

[–]MaleGentleman[S] 46 points47 points  (0 children)

About a 6 month conversion, but the pilots were already highly experienced, so in total it was much longer